SA Footy

i have heard 'on the grapevine' thats why i've said it is ONLY A RUMOUR that clayton & ginever had a heated arguement before the port v north match & this is the reason he pulled out of that game, & the speculation is that he won't be playing again.

now i do not really believe it (the not playing again) but we all know that arguements etc happens at all clubs, so i'm asking you 'port insiders' to let me/us know if there is any truth in these stories going around ??

lets put it this way.......he did not have an injury.....nor did poulton.

the chin is facing some 'chin' music

I don't think either of them are in the right state of mind to play this weekend.....

Jimmy wrote:the chin is facing some 'chin' music

morning Jimmy...hows those Cavs!!!

I have just called my old man who is a Port member, he has also confirmed the rumour

There were similar rumours last year when the wheel fell off Port's form in the second half of the season, that Clayton and Ginever were at odds along with one or two other players (not Poulton tho from memory). Clayton was certainly an angry man on the field in the Norwood game a couple of weeks ago.

Rumour or repitition.
Clayton v Ginever is an on going problem.

Dutchy wrote:

Jimmy wrote:the chin is facing some 'chin' music

morning Jimmy...hows those Cavs!!!

ive given up hope, still, they got there, thats a start.

its no rumour this one...

I don't like hearing this sort of talk when it is my sides next opponent as more often than not this type of controversy can galvanise a team.

That being said, where there's smoke there's fire and the Baby Blues would want to keep the Magpies on the canvas this week.

It is imperative Sturt are switched on from the first whistle as if they get off to a flyer then Port heads may sag a little.

Squawk wrote:There were similar rumours last year when the wheel fell off Port's form in the second half of the season, that Clayton and Ginever were at odds along with one or two other players (not Poulton tho from memory). Clayton was certainly an angry man on the field in the Norwood game a couple of weeks ago.

would clive waterhouse be another one that is not happy??????

This rumour seems to circulate each year. Always seems to coincide with Port losing. People on here are confirming the rumour. Does that mean that they have heard the rumour as well or that what is said in the rumour is actually true?

Aerie wrote:This rumour seems to circulate each year. Always seems to coincide with Port losing. People on here are confirming the rumour. Does that mean that they have heard the rumour as well or that what is said in the rumour is actually true?

the same person who told me Port were playing injured players (which turned out to be true) told me this rumour is true

Ask Dougie Robertson.

will anything major come of it? will someone get the sack? dropped? asked to leave?

be interesting to see who fronts up for port.

just want my blues to keep up the good work and dont give them a sniff this week..lets kick em while they are down. beware the wounded team.....

Dutchy wrote:

Aerie wrote:This rumour seems to circulate each year. Always seems to coincide with Port losing. People on here are confirming the rumour. Does that mean that they have heard the rumour as well or that what is said in the rumour is actually true?

the same person who told me Port were playing injured players (which turned out to be true) told me this rumour is true

can confirm this isnt a rumour people.

well as i said it was just a 'rumour' that i heard, but reading some of the replies you'd have to think 'where there's smoke there is fire'

so i ask this, if this is true & not manageable & can not be sorted out can both men be at the same club next year ?

Jeremy and Tim dont see eye to eye on things, that is true, but, as for it going as far as him refusing to play, I think that's rabble.

As for the Clive Waterhouse thing that some one brought up, Clive has a hamstring strain and is out for another 2 weeks.

PortAdelaideProud wrote:Jeremy and Tim dont see eye to eye on things, that is true,

Given the "stature" of both blokes I would have thought Tim and jeremy would be able to see eye to eye.....