by Redandblack00 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:34 pm
by smac » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:36 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:36 pm
by silicone skyline » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:37 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:38 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Footy Chick » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:38 pm
Redandblack00 wrote:4 Sturt Players Suspended from Under 18 for not meeting the requirements.... etc.....
Who are the players?
May Cost them getting drafted?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Barto » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:09 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Perhaps StrutPierre can respond to this one...
by Booney » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:13 pm
Barto wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Perhaps StrutPierre can respond to this one...
I wouldn't be too concerned with his opinion.
Judging by the story I got, it was handled very professionally by the SFC. Just a couple of young blokes getting on the turps when they shouldn't have been and I know that there's very few people who post here who can throw stones in regards to that.
by Aerie » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:22 pm
Booney wrote:One would assume an U/18 comp meant the players involved are under 18,thus not allowed to drink,regardless of the expectations placed on thier on field performances?
by am Bays » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:23 pm
Redandblack00 wrote:4 Sturt Players Suspended from Under 18 for not meeting the requirements.... etc.....
Who are the players?
May Cost them getting drafted?
by Barto » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:23 pm
Aerie wrote:Booney wrote:One would assume an U/18 comp meant the players involved are under 18,thus not allowed to drink,regardless of the expectations placed on thier on field performances?
Perhaps they had fake id's, in the name of Brian McGee?
by zipzap » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:35 pm
Barto wrote:Aerie wrote:Booney wrote:One would assume an U/18 comp meant the players involved are under 18,thus not allowed to drink,regardless of the expectations placed on thier on field performances?
Perhaps they had fake id's, in the name of Brian McGee?
They stayed up listening to Queen.
by Brucetiki » Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:27 pm
Barto wrote:Aerie wrote:Booney wrote:One would assume an U/18 comp meant the players involved are under 18,thus not allowed to drink,regardless of the expectations placed on thier on field performances?
Perhaps they had fake id's, in the name of Brian McGee?
They stayed up listening to Queen.
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:31 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:I hope the silkmeister wasn't one of them...............
by sturt1 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:02 pm
by Maddogmike » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:10 pm
by SDK » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:17 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:13 pm
Maddogmike wrote:Good on them learn from the old school way of gettin on the gas! Absolute legends!!!
by lesthemechanic » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:34 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |