by Benchwarmer » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:00 pm
by Dirko » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:07 pm
by Benchwarmer » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:17 pm
by mal » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:22 pm
by leftlegger » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:30 pm
by Interceptor » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:32 pm
mal wrote:Tassie Devils are setting the football world alight with its
immeasurable form in the VFL this season.
Hopefully the SANFL will never ever host a NT or TAS team.
by Benchwarmer » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:37 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:38 pm
Interceptor wrote:mal wrote:Tassie Devils are setting the football world alight with its
immeasurable form in the VFL this season.
Hopefully the SANFL will never ever host a NT or TAS team.
They are in a rebuilding phase Mal.
Would rather a Tas team than one from NT.
It's time to get rid of the bye, it's a major negative for the comp.
by brent » Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:55 pm
by brent » Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:58 pm
by Benchwarmer » Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:17 pm
by am Bays » Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:34 pm
by Apachebulldog » Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:36 pm
by mal » Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:41 pm
by Hondo » Mon Jul 02, 2007 6:44 pm
by spell_check » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:02 pm
by SnappyTom » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:19 pm
spell_check wrote:I find it funny how every time these stories come up everyone makes any prediction or suggestion just for the fun of it, seemingly.
If anyone did read the Budget about 5 weeks back, you would have noticed the captains say the players don't mind the bye.
by spell_check » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:27 pm
SnappyTom wrote:spell_check wrote:I find it funny how every time these stories come up everyone makes any prediction or suggestion just for the fun of it, seemingly.
If anyone did read the Budget about 5 weeks back, you would have noticed the captains say the players don't mind the bye.
It's not about the players, it's about the spectator, isn't it!![]()
![]()
by SnappyTom » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:36 pm
spell_check wrote:SnappyTom wrote:spell_check wrote:I find it funny how every time these stories come up everyone makes any prediction or suggestion just for the fun of it, seemingly.
If anyone did read the Budget about 5 weeks back, you would have noticed the captains say the players don't mind the bye.
It's not about the players, it's about the spectator, isn't it!![]()
![]()
So you would rather see 18 minor round matches instead of 20? (Effectively 17 if you can't afford to go to Tassie or NT)
That doesn't sound like 'for the spectators' does it?
by spell_check » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:40 pm
SnappyTom wrote:spell_check wrote:SnappyTom wrote:spell_check wrote:I find it funny how every time these stories come up everyone makes any prediction or suggestion just for the fun of it, seemingly.
If anyone did read the Budget about 5 weeks back, you would have noticed the captains say the players don't mind the bye.
It's not about the players, it's about the spectator, isn't it!![]()
![]()
So you would rather see 18 minor round matches instead of 20? (Effectively 17 if you can't afford to go to Tassie or NT)
That doesn't sound like 'for the spectators' does it?
Nope, didn't mean it that way. 'twas tongue in cheek.
refer italics...
You're a bit serious and touchy, spelly.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |