do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:45 pmscotty borlace ??
this is only 'tongue in cheek'
this is only 'tongue in cheek'
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:45 pmRe: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:55 pmI think they do, 5 in a row without him, I remember listening to the radio when he got injured and they said that it could be a good thing for Norwood as it will force the players to spread the load and step up. They were spot on.
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:27 pmOr perhaps they just play better with Massie and Campbell...
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:00 pmSpot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:08 pmSDK wrote:Spot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
At the moment it's fact...
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:15 pmSDK wrote:Spot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
Dont forget these guys are afl listed players, they should only be the icing on the cake and not the whole ingredients.
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:30 pmSnappyTom wrote:SDK wrote:Spot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
At the moment it's fact...
Perhaps but it's still rubbish.
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:14 pmNFC wrote:SnappyTom wrote:SDK wrote:Spot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
At the moment it's fact...
Perhaps but it's still rubbish.
Who's Borlaca?
Just kidding, it's still fact - and you still sound a bit sore from last weekend's spanking*!
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:17 pmNFC wrote:SnappyTom wrote:SDK wrote:Spot on Aerie and Matt Thomas.
To suggest Norwood play better without Borlaca is lunacy.
We are missing the hard at the ball play of Massie.....Campbell...Thomas.....full stop !
At the moment it's fact...
Perhaps but it's still rubbish.
hey, nfc look at what i said, i said it was tongue in cheek as we all know it is just coincidence that scotty has returned & norwood has lost a couple & it'll be 3 after saturday
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:51 pmThe legs play better without borlace only if he comes to Sturt.
Re: do norwood play better without ??
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:03 pmI would say Garry McIntosh from the grand finals I have been to. 