SA Footy

For those interested, thought I'd share the numbers I collated from the Centrals-Norwood game ... obviously they're not official. The 'official' Advertiser stats had 40 less disposals for Centrals so they weren't even credited with making 400 disposals (like the ABC did with 413). Anyway:

Centrals on left, Norwood on right
Long Kicks : 80-51
Short Kicks: 113-57
Kicks: 255-164 (Eff 77%-66%)
Handballs: 176-120 (Eff 88%-89%)
Disposals: 431-284 (Eff 81%-76%)
Cont Poss: 149-91
Uncont Poss: 281-191
Uncont Marks: 97-64
Cont Marks: 15-11
Marks: 112-75
Marks from Opp Kick: 12-9 (8-6 uncontested)
Hardball Gets: 54-30
Looseball Gets: 62-37
H/B Receives: 153-103
Inside 50s: 62-35
Rebound 50s: 27-28
Centre Breaks: 30-8
Ball Up Clear: 8-8
Throw In Clear: 10-10
Clearances: 48-26
Hit Outs: 44-33
Hit Outs to Adv: 4-3
Clangers: 31-41
Frees For: 18-13

In the last quarter, Centrals went inside 50 on 20 occasions for 11.1. They also had a staggering 19 clearances from 22 hit outs in that term alone, to Norwood's four hit outs and five clearances.

Centrals had 100 or more disposals in every quarter bar the first, where they had 99. They had 105, 116 and 111 in the second, third and fourth stanzas. The Legs had 76, 76, 74 and 58 over the four terms.

Norwood only had 14 contested possessions in the final quarter. AFL/SANFL league teams average roughly 25-30 per quarter.

So there you go ... orgasmic!

Not really that interesting at all once read. YAWN.

I thought they were interesting ... I know there wouldn't be anyway of knowing this, but I'd also love to know the collective km's covered by the two teams on the day.

Poor workrate for the Legs is an area that has been glossed over, as we're not a team that can rely on skills being executed without error.

When will this week end?

silicone skyline wrote:Not really that interesting at all once read. YAWN.

LOL. So why comment silly cone?

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

silicone skyline wrote:Not really that interesting at all once read. YAWN.

LOL. So why comment silly cone?

regards,

REB

Gathering personal stats on the post meter?

Those stats are interesting - they're a look behind the scoreboard result.

And those are the stats Norwood's coaching staff will be looking at to try and figure out what the hell went wrong.

Top work, Scott! Some of those stats are more detailed than what we record at Glenelg.

I think we are going to have to lift our game to keep up with the likes of you and Spelly!

Disappointing that the Advertiser once again missed so many stats, but we are getting used to that by now.

Rik E Boy wrote:

silicone skyline wrote:Not really that interesting at all once read. YAWN.

LOL. So why comment silly cone?

regards,

REB

I think those statistics don't reveal hell of a lot.
If a team loses by 158 points it's fair to say they got a smashing in all statistical areas, other than clangers.

Hey anyone got the Stats for when the Bays did the 49 goals ???
Is the forum big enough to be able to handle them !!

They're so old they are written in latin.

sjab wrote:Hey anyone got the Stats for when the Bays did the 49 goals ???
Is the forum big enough to be able to handle them !!

cue Spelly - I think he recorded them off the DVD of the game!

Any chance of the tackles and missed tackles stats being posted? Reckon the dogs had more tackles than the paper gave us credit for, and reckon Norwood had more than 50 missed tackles.

Grahaml wrote:Any chance of the tackles and missed tackles stats being posted? Reckon the dogs had more tackles than the paper gave us credit for, and reckon Norwood had more than 50 missed tackles.

What about after quarter time?

Constance_Perm wrote:

Grahaml wrote:Any chance of the tackles and missed tackles stats being posted? Reckon the dogs had more tackles than the paper gave us credit for, and reckon Norwood had more than 50 missed tackles.

What about after quarter time?

ROTFLMAO.
Nice one!

If a week is, indeed, along time in footy, a 158 point drubbing week might just take a month to clear!

Ecky wrote:

sjab wrote:Hey anyone got the Stats for when the Bays did the 49 goals ???
Is the forum big enough to be able to handle them !!

cue Spelly - I think he recorded them off the DVD of the game!

The DVD skips about 18 minutes of the 1st quarter, so they aren't really accurate, sjab.

18 free kicks to 13!

Bloody umpires impacting the result again!

Was originally going to say 100, but thought that might be too many. having thought about it, I remembre plenty of times 3 blokes missed tackles in the same play several times.

SnappyTom wrote:

Constance_Perm wrote:

Grahaml wrote:Any chance of the tackles and missed tackles stats being posted? Reckon the dogs had more tackles than the paper gave us credit for, and reckon Norwood had more than 50 missed tackles.

What about after quarter time?

ROTFLMAO.
Nice one!

If a week is, indeed, along time in footy, a 158 point drubbing week might just take a month to clear!

We could win the next 3 in a row (we won't) and I still wouldn't be over it!