Adelaide

Talk on the national game

Re: Adelaide

Postby Eagles2014 » Mon Sep 29, 2025 1:29 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
whufc wrote:Not disagreeing but I thought i read somewhere that the 'definition' of what constitutes a tackle statistically has changed dramatically over the years.


Well; there used to be this thing called "prior opportunity" and "incorrect disposal"
Both of those have gone

Example: Cameron's tackle on Jaspa Fletcher
No reward (from the umpires) for the outstanding chase and tackle
Fortunately, the football Gods stepped in and awarded Geelong a goal out of it

No need to show the 20 examples per game of players just dropping the ball when tackled


The Cameron tackle where Fletcher got a handball away :shock:
Eagles2014
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 1:56 pm
Has liked: 181 times
Been liked: 599 times

Re: Adelaide

Postby am Bays » Mon Sep 29, 2025 1:51 pm

The HTB law hasn't changed, it's just the interpretation

They just dont pay it unless it's major and obvious with respect to prior opportunity like Fletchers.

The AFL want the ball in motion and most HTBs result in a break in play that allows for defensive set up to prevent that.

So many HTBs that should be paid (especially with respect to incorrect disposal) are simply called play on.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19920
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 2162 times

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gossipgirl, mal, PatowalongaPirate and 32 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |