by mal » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:08 am
by heater31 » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:26 am
by mal » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:33 am
heater31 wrote:There is only one more bigger than this mal and you know what i mean
by heater31 » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:49 am
by spell_check » Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:59 am
by mal » Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:29 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:40 pm
by mal » Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:48 pm
Borat wrote:The Bulldogs don't get a choice.
Part of the conditions of the annual 1 to 2 million bail out the dogs receive from the AFL is that they MUST play 2 "home games" interstate each season.
Until the club can stand financially on it's own feet (probably not in the next decade)then nothing else will change.
by stan » Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:55 pm
mal wrote:Western Bulldogs
They lost in Sydney this year again.
They lost in Darwin.
Now they will be rooted after playing in that heat.
St. Kilda persist in Hobart.
Kangarooteds are shifting from Canberra to Gold Coast.
Hawthorn continue in Hobart, and went to Brisbane for a home game in 2006
Melbourne keep going to Brisbane.
Its not a level playing field for these clubs.
The AFL calls it an expansion of the game, if thats the case why
not get AC/PP/SS/WC/FR/BL to give up home games as well.
Add to this the ground rationalisation of WB/SK/KA at the Doom
CO/ES/ML at the Gee and its just very very unfair.
As for the Bulldogs they are the most disadvantaged club in the AFL,
which is a pity as they and West Coast are two of the few clubs that
try and play inspiring football.
by sydney-dog » Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:02 pm
by stan » Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:03 pm
sydney-dog wrote:it will be a massive challenge for both Port and the Dogs to recover this week
by mal » Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:26 pm
sydney-dog wrote:it will be a massive challenge for both Port and the Dogs to recover this week
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |