SA Footy

I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

mots02 wrote:I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

An elite tall American forward.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mots02 wrote:I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

An elite tall American forward.

now THAT makes sense

Spargo wrote:

beef wrote:Maybe people will stop using stats to define good players.
Stats don't always equal performance.

Cripps, no mention?

C’mon mate he’s no Motlop or Cox.

mots02 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mots02 wrote:I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

An elite tall American forward.

now THAT makes sense

His response to the rankings makes him elite

mots02 wrote:I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

He's the elite American.

regards,

REB

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mots02 wrote:I'm assuming Mason Cox was graded as elite as a tall forward.

I'm also assuming that when making that decision that they rated the element of 'being tall' more highly than any attributes or output of being a 'forward'.

An elite tall American forward.

Beat me to it LOL.