tigerpie wrote:ASADA/WADA set the penalty dont they?
Only IF they are found guilty of using a banned substance
As of yet they still havnt got any clear cut evidence of drug use
by Jim05 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:09 pm
tigerpie wrote:ASADA/WADA set the penalty dont they?
by tigerpie » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:11 pm
by locky801 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:13 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:18 pm
tigerpie wrote:Dont they have hard evidence that they bought banned drugs?
by tigerpie » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:30 pm
by Killa » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:08 pm
by Johno6 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:08 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:17 pm
by Turbo » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:52 am
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:55 am
by dedja » Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:46 am
by stun72 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:01 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:The Bombers better get their Flak Jackets on I think they are going to need them after that article!!!!
The AFL must go very very very heavy on the Bombers.
They are in total denial of what they have done.
As I said before this should be the penalities
$3 MILLION FINE
LOSS OF 2013 POINTS
REID - RETIRE
THOMPSON 1 YEAR BAN
ROBINSON - LIFE
DANK - LIFE
CORCORAN - LIFE
HIRD - LIFE
LOSS OF DRAFT PICKS 3 YEARS
NO TRADING FOR DRAFT PICKS
by daysofourlives » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:22 pm
stun72 wrote:FOURTH ESTATE wrote:The Bombers better get their Flak Jackets on I think they are going to need them after that article!!!!
The AFL must go very very very heavy on the Bombers.
They are in total denial of what they have done.
As I said before this should be the penalities
$3 MILLION FINE
LOSS OF 2013 POINTS
REID - RETIRE
THOMPSON 1 YEAR BAN
ROBINSON - LIFE
DANK - LIFE
CORCORAN - LIFE
HIRD - LIFE
LOSS OF DRAFT PICKS 3 YEARS
NO TRADING FOR DRAFT PICKS
Agree with most of the above.
Let them play finals this year - on current form it won't be much longer but instead make them play next year but for no premiership points..
by GWW » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:54 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:55 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:58 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:VLAD gets his crowds etc for this season unaffected, but next season??????
by Damo 497 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:22 pm
by Q. » Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:34 pm
Damo 497 wrote:Essendon are potentially getting done for lack of management. Not sure where the issue of banned substances comes in to it. More the fact that all and sundry did not really know what was happening with the club. Where is the evidence of illegal drugs???? There isn't any. This is all the AFL has. The management at Essendon should hang their heads in shame however; the whole process regarding ASSADA, WADA and all the other acronyms is a dog's breakfast. The media are also responsible for the junk we see on TV, speculation, innuendo etc. Perhaps their qualifications should include common sense as one of the subjects.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:04 am
Damo 497 wrote:Essendon are potentially getting done for lack of management. Not sure where the issue of banned substances comes in to it. More the fact that all and sundry did not really know what was happening with the club. Where is the evidence of illegal drugs???? There isn't any. This is all the AFL has. The management at Essendon should hang their heads in shame however; the whole process regarding ASSADA, WADA and all the other acronyms is a dog's breakfast. The media are also responsible for the junk we see on TV, speculation, innuendo etc. Perhaps their qualifications should include common sense as one of the subjects.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |