Match Review Panel

Talk on the national game

Re: Re: Match Review Panel

Postby cripple » Wed May 16, 2012 8:13 am

The Sleeping Giant wrote:As I thought. Guidelines, not rules.
[url]http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2011/s3225219.htm[/url]


Wrong again. How about going.straight to the source when looking for AFL rules. http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default ... sid=109725

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
cripple
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Mexico
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed May 16, 2012 1:00 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Yes, I'll have to start rebuilding.


Heh heh. We were certainly owned at Footy park last weekend.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Re: Re: Match Review Panel

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Wed May 16, 2012 1:16 pm

cripple wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:As I thought. Guidelines, not rules.
[url]http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2011/s3225219.htm[/url]


Wrong again. How about going.straight to the source when looking for AFL rules. http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default ... sid=109725

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Cheers mate. Guidelines again. Obviously Harry Taylor just had slight concussion, and was assessed as fit to return to the field. Geelong did nothing wrong.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Match Review Panel

Postby RustyCage » Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:27 pm

Vince can accept a week
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby CUTTERMAN » Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:14 pm

what a joke a few weeks ago Harvey gets off with nothing :roll:
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby CoverKing » Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm

Waters only one week. Damn you!
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby RustyCage » Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:29 pm

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/137750/default.aspx

MRP report: round 10

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend's matches. The following charges were laid, while one matter remains outstanding and is still being dealt with by the MRP:

Charges laid:
Ben McGlynn Sydney Swans, has been charged with a level two striking offence against Patrick Veszpremi, Western Bulldogs, during the first quarter of the Round 10 match between the Sydney Swans and the Western Bulldogs, played at the SCG on Sunday June 3, 2012.

In summary, due to his poor record, his sanction must remain as a one-match penalty, even with an early plea.

Based on an AFL investigation, the video evidence available and a medical report from the Western Bulldogs Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of 60 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 185 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 138.75 points and a one-match sanction.

Jake King, Richmond, has been charged with a level one tripping offence against Stephen Milne, St Kilda, during the first quarter of the Round 10 match between Richmond and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Friday June 1, 2012.

In summary, due to his poor record, his sanction is increased to a one-match penalty, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 80 demerit points and a reprimand. He has an existing bad record of five matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 50 per cent to 120 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He also has 71.85 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 191.85 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 143.89 points and a one-match sanction.

Jordan Lewis, Hawthorn, has been charged with a level two engaging in rough conduct offence against Todd Goldstein, North Melbourne, during the fourth quarter of the Round 10 match between Hawthorn and North Melbourne, played at Aurora Stadium on Saturday June 2, 2012.

In summary, due to a poor record, his two-match sanction must remain at two matches, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the North Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a level two offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of two matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 20 per cent to 270 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He also has 50 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 320 demerit points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 240 demerit points and a two-match sanction.

Ryan Crowley, Fremantle, has been charged with a first offence for staging during the second quarter of the Round 10 match between Fremantle and the Adelaide Crows, played at Patersons Stadium on Saturday June 2, 2012.

In summary, he can accept a written reprimand for a first offence with an early plea.

Bernie Vince, Adelaide Crows, has been charged with a level three striking offence against Zac Clarke, Fremantle, during the third quarter of the Round 10 match between the Adelaide Crows and Fremantle, played at Patersons Stadium on Saturday June 2, 2012.

In summary, due to a five-year good record, he can accept a one-match sanction with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Fremantle Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, which reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 168.75 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 126.56 points and a one-match sanction.

Patrick Ryder, Essendon, has been charged with a level one tripping offence against Dan Nicholson, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round 10 match between Essendon and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday June 2, 2012.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 66 points towards his future record with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 80 demerit points and a reprimand. He has an existing bad record of one match suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 10 per cent to 88 demerit points and a reprimand. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 66 points towards his future record.

Beau Waters, West Coast, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence against Jack Redden, Brisbane Lions, during the third quarter of the Round 10 match between West Coast and the Brisbane Lions, played at the Gabba on Sunday June 3, 2012.

In summary, due to his previous poor record, his one-match sanction must remain at one match, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Brisbane Lions Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 218.75 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 164.06 points and a one-match sanction.

Other incidents Assessed:
Contact between Richmond's Jake King and St Kilda's Sean Dempster from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. The ball was being kicked into the Richmond forward line to player Robbie Nahas when King blocked Dempster from going to the contest. It was the view of the panel that King's actions were not excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances. No further action was taken.

Contact between St Kilda's Stephen Milne and Richmond's Alex Rance from the second quarter of Friday's match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.

Contact between the Geelong Cats' Jimmy Bartel, the GWS Giants' Dom Tyson and umpire Matthew Leppard from the third quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. As the ball was being bounced by umpire Leppard, Tyson and fellow GWS Giants' player Sam Darley were seeking to block player Bartel from reaching the contest for the ball. Bartel is moving towards the ball and he loses balance as he jostles with Tyson. As umpire Leppard heads backwards after bouncing the ball, his foot is entangled with the legs of Tyson, at the same time as Bartel is also falling towards the umpire. It was the view of the panel there was no negligence on behalf of the players regarding the contact made with the umpire. No further action was taken.

Contact between the Geelong Cats' James Kelly and the GWS Giants' Toby Greene from the third quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. Greene is bending down to pick up the ball while Kelly is coming towards him from the opposite direction. Kelly makes high contact on the Giants' player and a free kick was paid at the time. After viewing all available footage and receiving a medical report from the GWS Giants' it was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.

The actions of Essendon's Leroy Jetta during the second quarter of Saturday's game were assessed. The panel said Jetta had the ball and was trying to avoid being tackled as he prepared to kick for goal. Melbourne player Joel Macdonald dispossessed Jetta with an attempted tackle and Jetta exaggerated the contact by falling backwards as he went to ground. The panel said that while Jetta's actions were exaggerated, it was their view they were not excessive in nature and he did not feign illegal contact. No further action was taken.

Contact between the Brisbane Lions' Mitch Golby and umpire Ben Ryan from the end of the third quarter of Sunday's match was assessed. Golby briefly put his hand on umpire Ryan's shirt sleeve when talking to him at the end of the quarter. The umpire did not pay a free kick for the contact and did not report the contact occurring, as part of his review of the game, saying the conversation between the pair was cordial at all times. It was the view of the panel the contact made by Golby did not interfere with the umpire performing his duties. The assessment of the panel was that there was minimal to negligible contact and the action was not in any way demonstrative or threatening towards the umpire. No further action was taken.

Contact between West Coast's Darren Glass and the Brisbane Lions' Josh Green from the fourth quarter of Sunday's match was assessed. The ball is loose in the Brisbane forward line with Green and Glass coming towards the contest from opposite directions. As Green takes possession of the ball, Glass braces for contact. It was the view of the panel that player Glass had no realistic alternative way to contest the ball. No further action was taken.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Coach Bombay » Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:17 pm

Great to see Crowley punished, really refreshing stuff
The death penalty can never be excused as it allows a state a means by which it can pick and choose who is fit to live and who isnt
User avatar
Coach Bombay
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:12 pm
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 143 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby CoverKing » Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:10 am

how did james kelly not get cited?
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby bulldog2004 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:44 pm

CoverKing wrote:how did james kelly not get cited?

:-k :-k :-k
bulldog2004
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby CUTTERMAN » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:00 pm

can't believe Adelaide and Vince have accepted a one game suspension. :roll:
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Grafter » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:12 pm

Buddy Franklin cleared on "Sling Tackle" Ah the consistency of the MRP strikes again !!!!!
Grafter
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby RustyCage » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:31 pm

Grafter wrote:Buddy Franklin cleared on "Sling Tackle" Ah the consistency of the MRP strikes again !!!!!


wonder if he will get done for constantly staging for frees too!
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Squids » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:34 pm

Grafter wrote:Buddy Franklin cleared on "Sling Tackle" Ah the consistency of the MRP strikes again !!!!!


Didn't slam his head into the ground, play on.
Image
User avatar
Squids
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7539
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:47 pm
Location: mod city
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 205 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Grafter » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm

A Sling Tackle is a Sling Tackle regardless of whether a players head hits the Ground. The result of said tackle should not be taken into account. Did I want to see Buddy rubbed out ? No I didn't, did I want Tax Walker rubbed out ? No I didn't. I just want some consistency from the people who rule our game.
Grafter
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:41 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:22 pm

Alwyn Davey offered 2 weeks for his bump on Hannebury :shock:
Even though it was deemed a fair bump the MRP has stated that any incidental contact after the bump will be deemed reckless, Hannebury was concussed after his head hit the ground after being bumped
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48359
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3845 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby CUTTERMAN » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:52 pm

MRP.......pffft
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Punk Rooster » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:25 pm

Jim05 wrote:Alwyn Davey offered 2 weeks for his bump on Hannebury :shock:
Even though it was deemed a fair bump the MRP has stated that any incidental contact after the bump will be deemed reckless, Hannebury was concussed after his head hit the ground after being bumped

saw the hit, Hannebury was hit fair and square- Davey should fight it all the way.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:31 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Alwyn Davey offered 2 weeks for his bump on Hannebury :shock:
Even though it was deemed a fair bump the MRP has stated that any incidental contact after the bump will be deemed reckless, Hannebury was concussed after his head hit the ground after being bumped

saw the hit, Hannebury was hit fair and square- Davey should fight it all the way.

They were explaining the new rule on SEN today, if you have any other option but still choose to bump you are liable for any injury that comes out of it. The MRP has stated that Davey chose to bump instead of tackle, they agreed the bump was fair but because he fell down and hit his head it is Davey's fault. I hope he fights it but I dont have any faith in him getting off
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48359
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3845 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Match Review Panel

Postby JK » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:35 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Alwyn Davey offered 2 weeks for his bump on Hannebury :shock:
Even though it was deemed a fair bump the MRP has stated that any incidental contact after the bump will be deemed reckless, Hannebury was concussed after his head hit the ground after being bumped

saw the hit, Hannebury was hit fair and square- Davey should fight it all the way.

They were explaining the new rule on SEN today, if you have any other option but still choose to bump you are liable for any injury that comes out of it. The MRP has stated that Davey chose to bump instead of tackle, they agreed the bump was fair but because he fell down and hit his head it is Davey's fault. I hope he fights it but I dont have any faith in him getting off


Thats crazy .. Who's to say Hannebury wouldn't have still hit his head via a tackle?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mots02 and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |