Re: AFL Round 3
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:07 am
Logged on this morning for the 3am match review.
Disappointing.
Disappointing.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Port’s FB page is in full swing atm
Anything about the goal kicking or Jake Lever having 12 intercept possessions?mots02 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Port’s FB page is in full swing atm
Haha… just had a look.
Umpires
Hinkley
Umpires
Crowtards
Umpires
Repeat
The Dark Knight wrote:Anything about the goal kicking or Jake Lever having 12 intercept possessions?mots02 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Port’s FB page is in full swing atm
Haha… just had a look.
Umpires
Hinkley
Umpires
Crowtards
Umpires
Repeat
I hate how people just immediately blame the umpires across the socials.
mots02 wrote:Occasionally a voice of reason popped in to mention goal kicking but they were drowned out by the moronic ‘afl and umpires are against us’ chorus.
Melb being a good team didn’t get a mention.
The Dark Knight wrote:Anything about the goal kicking or Jake Lever having 12 intercept possessions?mots02 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Port’s FB page is in full swing atm
Haha… just had a look.
Umpires
Hinkley
Umpires
Crowtards
Umpires
Repeat
I hate how people just immediately blame the umpires across the socials.
Vamos wrote:Staggering how people still go on those socials, even more staggering is that because of what's said on them, all supporters get tarred with the same brush.
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim05 wrote:At the end of the day some age old truths still stand.whufc wrote:Booney wrote:Gawn, Oliver, Lever. If you let those 3 blokes win their positions you lose.
Or just kick the goals when the game is on the line…..don’t over think it.
Both teams that lost today missed too many sitters.
I still find it bizarre that with millions spent on fitness programs and all the other stuff that not enough attention is paid to the single most important facet of the game.
Blame the sports scientists....
Lightning McQueen wrote:Vamos wrote:Staggering how people still go on those socials, even more staggering is that because of what's said on them, all supporters get tarred with the same brush.
Alf Vassall always seems to use his brain, he used to be a forumite, good bloke, I used to work with him.
Armchair expert wrote:The combined winning margin of Dogs and Swans today will be over/under 150 points ?
I say over
Vamos wrote:Armchair expert wrote:The combined winning margin of Dogs and Swans today will be over/under 150 points ?
I say over
Swans win I collect $106 on a multi, current cashout $76, thoughts?
Vamos wrote:Staggering how people still go on those socials, even more staggering is that because of what's said on them, all supporters get tarred with the same brush.
Spargo wrote:Vamos wrote:Armchair expert wrote:The combined winning margin of Dogs and Swans today will be over/under 150 points ?
I say over
Swans win I collect $106 on a multi, current cashout $76, thoughts?
Never EVER cash out under any circumstances. You can lay off elsewhere & make money, Betfair etc
@Dutchy & @mighty_tiger_79 are your men in this instance.
Plus Richmond couldn’t win if they started right now.
cracka wrote:Vamos wrote:Staggering how people still go on those socials, even more staggering is that because of what's said on them, all supporters get tarred with the same brush.
Fair bit of pot/kettle about you
Aren't you the one who tried to tar a Crows supporter on here with the "right in front of me" brush
mal wrote:Spargo wrote:Vamos wrote:Armchair expert wrote:The combined winning margin of Dogs and Swans today will be over/under 150 points ?
I say over
Swans win I collect $106 on a multi, current cashout $76, thoughts?
Never EVER cash out under any circumstances. You can lay off elsewhere & make money, Betfair etc
@Dutchy & @mighty_tiger_79 are your men in this instance.
Plus Richmond couldn’t win if they started right now.
What about @Mal in this instance ?