SA Footy

whufc wrote:

Chuck Wepner wrote:

whufc wrote:Not that i watch alot of games but i get the feeling Port are right in the middle of what Hinkley has acheived so far, the firs year they definitely over achieved and then this year horribly under achieved. Personally i would think they probably have the list of 5-7 side.

Hinkleys first year was 2013, Geelong knocked them out in the finals. I think they had a good season, wouldn't say they over achieved, if that's even possible.

Yeah i would have him down as

2013- par to maybe slightly above par
2014- exceptional / over acheived
2015- extremly dissapointing / under achevied

Spargo wrote:Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

Spargo wrote:Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

Spargo wrote:Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

JK wrote:There's been rumours for a few months now that the Crows will keep a fair portion of their Salary Cap available for a decent go at Wingard when he comes out of contract (which I think is end of 2016?).

Ruben Carter wrote:

Spargo wrote:Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

I'd rather not have Dixon if it means trading Hartlett. Can't we do a package deal with Mitchell, O'Shea and B Ebert instead?
Not happy still ? Have Butcher as well.

bennymacca wrote:

JK wrote:There's been rumours for a few months now that the Crows will keep a fair portion of their Salary Cap available for a decent go at Wingard when he comes out of contract (which I think is end of 2016?).

there is no way in hell he would come. seems fanciful at best given port will give him what he is worth, and he would stay in adelaide regardless

Spargo wrote:Booney in 5,4,3,2,1

Spargo wrote:A Port supporter who doesn't rate Ebert? Well I'll be f#cked, maybe you don't all have the blinkers on.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Spargo wrote:A Port supporter who doesn't rate Ebert? Well I'll be f#cked, maybe you don't all have the blinkers on.

He's a strong lad that can find the ball, his disposal is poor and he goes missing in the tough games.

bennymacca wrote:can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

bennymacca wrote:can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

hawks21 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

Nah, i'll take 150 Dangerfield games over 250 Ebert games

Booney wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:He's a strong lad that can find the ball, his disposal is poor and he goes missing in the tough games.

He, IMO, was out best player in the first 5 weeks of this year, widely spoken about how tough that early draw was too.

From that he got a dose of the fumbles, his disposal efficiency went down and he went from one of our premier midfielders to well behind several others. He's capable, but he's no Dangerfield.