Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:08 pm
This whole thread is great
This whole thread is great
Page 84 of 206
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:08 pm This whole thread is great
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:09 pmHH3 wrote::lol:
This whole thread is great
It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 2:10 pmSpargo wrote:HH3 wrote::lol:
This whole thread is great
It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...
I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:31 pmmots02 wrote:Spargo wrote:mots02 wrote:bertiebeatle wrote:
if his price is ridiculous and his feet are as bad as you say.... maybe he will walk as no one else will touch him?
If his feet were “that bad” Port wouldn’t have offered him 3 more years...
Correct... just having a giggle at Port fans claiming that he has bad feet, isn't worth the money that he's been offered or the length of contract... but he's worth a mid first round or he can get stuffed! lol
C’mon Mots02 we all know players coming to Port gain a grade or two and when they leave they get downgraded again.
Wait til Wingard leaves....... he’ll quickly go from an A+ to a B-
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:40 pmHH3 wrote:Spargo wrote:HH3 wrote::lol:
This whole thread is great
It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...
I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...
You need to get your carer to change your bib, it’s full of dribble.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:55 pmamber_fluid wrote:HH3 wrote:Spargo wrote:HH3 wrote::lol:
This whole thread is great
It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...
I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...
You need to get your carer to change your bib, it’s full of dribble.
It's full of a few things
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 5:32 pmHe said bib not nappy
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 9:57 pmWe finished higher and getting stronger,while they cant hold their players
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:56 pmAccepting blokes from clubs that didn't make the 8. It's the same mistake Port made last off-season.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:06 pmPort's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:16 amPatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.
Like North have with Polec?
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:19 amPolec has said all he wanted to stay was a 4 year deal, Port said no, the future will decide who was right.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:21 amDutchy wrote:Polec has said all he wanted to stay was a 4 year deal, Port said no, the future will decide who was right.
It's up to John Butcher?
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:32 amHow can I "like" the search function?
15/3/17
15/3/17
Spargo wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Polec is the one player with more upside than anyone on the list
If he can recapture his 2014 form and have that run and carry and deliver back in his game, he will be very important.
I know he has had injuries but he has been harshly treated by Ken and been made the scapegoat for others that should have been dropped before him IMO.
Polec
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am4/10/17
morell wrote:Spargo wrote:morell wrote:So did Dixon. So did Polec when we got him.
Footballers have surgery, its par for the course. As someone else mentioned, hes played at least 16 games a year since his debut.
Polec
If you think Polec isn't absolutely critical to Ports team you have NFI. Massively underrated player.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:34 amBooney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.
Like North have with Polec?
Didn't Port offer Polec a contract?
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:38 amBooney wrote:How can I "like" the search function?
15/3/17Spargo wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Polec is the one player with more upside than anyone on the list
If he can recapture his 2014 form and have that run and carry and deliver back in his game, he will be very important.
I know he has had injuries but he has been harshly treated by Ken and been made the scapegoat for others that should have been dropped before him IMO.
Polec
18 months ago, that’s clutching at straws if ever I saw it.
I’ve repeatedly said his form this year has been excellent & he’s made me eat some humble pie.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:39 amBooney wrote:4/10/17morell wrote:Spargo wrote:morell wrote:So did Dixon. So did Polec when we got him.
Footballers have surgery, its par for the course. As someone else mentioned, hes played at least 16 games a year since his debut.
Polec
If you think Polec isn't absolutely critical to Ports team you have NFI. Massively underrated player.
Yet not critical enough at the time for Port to offer a contract extension...
You’re better than this, Booney.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:45 amMate, you were the one laughing at him, not me.
Re: North Melbourne
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:46 amPatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.
Like North have with Polec?
Didn't Port offer Polec a contract?
We did,but if we wanted to keep him we would have upped it, wouldn't we?