daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
dfaq? ... the only reason the Cats even got close.
by dedja » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:37 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
by The Dark Knight » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:39 pm
daysofourlives wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
Hawkins was brilliant Days certainly not his fault they lost, did everything he could in that last quarter to win it, if more of his mates helped him out then maybe the result would of gone Geelongs way. Hawkins was Geelongs best for mine.
Had very kickable goals all night that he missed, his big last quarter certainly nearly won them the game but he is paid to kick goals and didnt do it
by HH3 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:43 pm
by daysofourlives » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:47 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:daysofourlives wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
Hawkins was brilliant Days certainly not his fault they lost, did everything he could in that last quarter to win it, if more of his mates helped him out then maybe the result would of gone Geelongs way. Hawkins was Geelongs best for mine.
Had very kickable goals all night that he missed, his big last quarter certainly nearly won them the game but he is paid to kick goals and didnt do it
Well yes, at the end of the day that's his job. You can't deny he was very good though.
Anyhoo, did blow your load when the final siren went knowing Geelong were out?
by bennymacca » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:47 pm
HH3 wrote:If the umpires are being instructed to not give Lindsay Thomas frees because of who he is, its a ******* disgrace. Not dissimilar to match fixing.
They should be totally impartial, look at the guernsey, not the player, and pay ANY free they see. Who committed and whoever it was committed against should have absolutely no bearing on if its paid or not.
Fair enough he staged, but thats when the umps shouldnt have given him frees. They can't just try to even things up after the fact. Where's the integrity in that.
by HH3 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:53 pm
bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:If the umpires are being instructed to not give Lindsay Thomas frees because of who he is, its a ******* disgrace. Not dissimilar to match fixing.
They should be totally impartial, look at the guernsey, not the player, and pay ANY free they see. Who committed and whoever it was committed against should have absolutely no bearing on if its paid or not.
Fair enough he staged, but thats when the umps shouldnt have given him frees. They can't just try to even things up after the fact. Where's the integrity in that.
i agree, but he has made his bed...
by Jim05 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:58 pm
HH3 wrote:If the umpires are being instructed to not give Lindsay Thomas frees because of who he is, its a ******* disgrace. Not dissimilar to match fixing.
They should be totally impartial, look at the guernsey, not the player, and pay ANY free they see. Who committed and whoever it was committed against should have absolutely no bearing on if its paid or not.
Fair enough he staged, but thats when the umps shouldnt have given him frees. They can't just try to even things up after the fact. Where's the integrity in that.
by bennymacca » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:11 am
HH3 wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:If the umpires are being instructed to not give Lindsay Thomas frees because of who he is, its a ******* disgrace. Not dissimilar to match fixing.
They should be totally impartial, look at the guernsey, not the player, and pay ANY free they see. Who committed and whoever it was committed against should have absolutely no bearing on if its paid or not.
Fair enough he staged, but thats when the umps shouldnt have given him frees. They can't just try to even things up after the fact. Where's the integrity in that.
i agree, but he has made his bed...
Makes no difference. If they are changing the rules of the game to suit some players, and to hinder other players, it really is corruption. Its a strong word, but honestly, it is.
by HH3 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:20 am
by saintal » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:24 am
by woodublieve12 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:32 am
HH3 wrote:Id say there's some chance...
You know who has no chance???
Geelong. Coz they're gaaawwwwnnnn!!!
by Rik E Boy » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:40 am
by HH3 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:44 am
Rik E Boy wrote:North a still shite.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:09 am
HH3 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:North a still shite.
regards,
REB
The best team won on the night.
Regards
by BoundaryRider84 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:10 am
dedja wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
dfaq? ... the only reason the Cats even got close.
by Jim05 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 9:31 am
BoundaryRider84 wrote:dedja wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Was great to see the sooky lala Hawkins with tears in his eyes, how bout you learn to kick and your team wouldnt have lost.
dfaq? ... the only reason the Cats even got close.
Good to see you are drippling craps Days, Hawkins would has had the 3-2-1 votes for geelong tonight. Clearly the best cat!
by JK » Sat Sep 13, 2014 9:46 am
HH3 wrote:So its a free for someone else, but not him, because they didn't do their job properly in the past and gave him frees when he was staging??
You can't change rules to suit an agenda! End of story!
This is why "interpretation" is retarded. It gives officials too much control over the outcome of games, instead of what the players actually do determining the winners.
by bennymacca » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:19 pm
HH3 wrote:So its a free for someone else, but not him, because they didn't do their job properly in the past and gave him frees when he was staging??
You can't change rules to suit an agenda! End of story!
This is why "interpretation" is retarded. It gives officials too much control over the outcome of games, instead of what the players actually do determining the winners.
by Special One » Sat Sep 13, 2014 6:00 pm
HH3 wrote:If the umpires are being instructed to not give Lindsay Thomas frees because of who he is, its a ******* disgrace. Not dissimilar to match fixing.
They should be totally impartial, look at the guernsey, not the player, and pay ANY free they see. Who committed and whoever it was committed against should have absolutely no bearing on if its paid or not.
Fair enough he staged, but thats when the umps shouldnt have given him frees. They can't just try to even things up after the fact. Where's the integrity in that.
by woodublieve12 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:15 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |