Page 99 of 116

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:02 pm
by gossipgirl
don't tell Kochi as he will start sooking about that as well :D

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:04 pm
by HH3
The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:11 pm
by MW
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


Kane Cornes didnt have the same filter when talking about Walsh for about 10 minutes on 5AA! I reckon by the end he'd realised and was pulling back :lol:

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:14 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


I would've advised to go the other way

pump up Port as much possible and play down expectations for the crows (which he did)

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:15 pm
by HH3
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


I would've advised to go the other way

pump up Port as much possible and play down expectations for the crows (which he did)


Can you really see anyone at the Crows actual think they're not top 4 contenders and Port are still the states 2nd best team?

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:19 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
if the Roos can make the top 4, the crows are capable of making the top 4. Just gotta add a few players and win the close games.

I see the same comparison of the crows 2014 with the roos of 2013


I love how Walsh emphasised the TEAM factor, was that directed at Dangerfield?

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:22 pm
by MW
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:if the Roos can make the top 4, the crows are capable of making the top 4. Just gotta add a few players and win the close games.

I see the same comparison of the crows 2014 with the roos of 2013


I love how Walsh emphasised the TEAM factor, was that directed at Dangerfield?


Give me a break :roll:
Someone farted...quick blame Dangerfield
There is a typhoon building over Japan...bl00dy Dangerfield

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:22 pm
by Footy Smart
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:if the Roos can make the top 4, the crows are capable of making the top 4. Just gotta add a few players and win the close games.

I see the same comparison of the crows 2014 with the roos of 2013


I love how Walsh emphasised the TEAM factor, was that directed at Dangerfield?



in his chat on 5AA he also said he wouldnt be in favour of paying a player 1mil a year. Once again emphasising TEAM which was good to hear.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:26 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
MW wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:if the Roos can make the top 4, the crows are capable of making the top 4. Just gotta add a few players and win the close games.

I see the same comparison of the crows 2014 with the roos of 2013


I love how Walsh emphasised the TEAM factor, was that directed at Dangerfield?


Give me a break :roll:
Someone farted...quick blame Dangerfield
There is a typhoon building over Japan...bl00dy Dangerfield



yeah, you are right, ill give you a break, how wrong of me to compare the crows to the roos and being a top 4 side :D

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 12:49 pm
by MW
yeah I'll pay that lol

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:12 pm
by Dutchy
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


Ive listened to 3 interviews with him now and none have mentioned Kochie breaking the story early, maybe is was a condition of the interview?

Port's achievements over the past 2 years have been completely blown out of proportion in this town.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:14 pm
by Spargo
5,4,3,2.............1

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:22 pm
by Footy Smart
Dutchy wrote:
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


Ive listened to 3 interviews with him now and none have mentioned Kochie breaking the story early, maybe is was a condition of the interview?

Port's achievements over the past 2 years have been completely blown out of proportion in this town.


Giving air time to Koch is exactly what he wants.... dont play the game!

At the end of the day the only people put out were the candidates who hadnt been informed of the final decision yet. Im not to sure Keith Thomas would have been to happy with Koch as he is extremely professional.

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:41 pm
by gossipgirl
Dutchy wrote:
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


Ive listened to 3 interviews with him now and none have mentioned Kochie breaking the story early, maybe is was a condition of the interview?

Port's achievements over the past 2 years have been completely blown out of proportion in this town.



I think Alberton and the Port Propaganda machine has just imploded :D

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:49 pm
by valleys07
gossipgirl wrote:Port Propaganda machine has just imploded


Nah, i'm pretty sure AFL360 will be on fox next year ;)

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 1:55 pm
by Booney
Dutchy wrote:
HH3 wrote:The Crows probably asked him not to talk up their biggest rivals in his first interview as head coach. Makes sense to me.


Ive listened to 3 interviews with him now and none have mentioned Kochie breaking the story early, maybe is was a condition of the interview?

Port's achievements over the past 2 years have been completely blown out of proportion in this town



I'll bite.

I'll also look forward to you explaining how going from 15th with 18,000 at games to 3rd with 43,000 at games in two full seasons has been "blown out of proportion".

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:11 pm
by gossipgirl
Couldn't have anything to do with Adelaide Oval ;)

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:15 pm
by carey
gossipgirl wrote:Couldn't have anything to do with Adelaide Oval ;)


Oh yeah that's it. Its just Adelaide oval :roll:

Nothing to do with the fact Port won an extra 8-10 games and played finals.

More quality input....

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:34 pm
by Q.
carey wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:Couldn't have anything to do with Adelaide Oval ;)


Oh yeah that's it. Its just Adelaide oval :roll:

Nothing to do with the fact Port won an extra 8-10 games and played finals.

More quality input....


Hopefully all those bandwagoners stick around

Re: Crows 2014

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 2:44 pm
by carey
Q. wrote:
carey wrote:
gossipgirl wrote:Couldn't have anything to do with Adelaide Oval ;)


Oh yeah that's it. Its just Adelaide oval :roll:

Nothing to do with the fact Port won an extra 8-10 games and played finals.

More quality input....


Hopefully all those bandwagoners stick around


I'm one of those who were standing there freezing f##king cold in a crowd of 15,000 watching us lose to Carlton, Melbourne and the like so I aint going anywhere mate trust me...........