by MatteeG » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:30 am
by Dissident » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:09 am
by Dissident » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:30 am
by stan » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:41 am
by Dissident » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:42 am
by stan » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:45 am
by Blue Boy » Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:23 am
by Dissident » Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:24 am
Blue Boy wrote:I wonder if the crows had of just kept silent on this - they could of just picked him up on the father son rule and then just went oops sorry our miscalculation and taken the fine.
by doggies4eva » Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:10 pm
by RustyCage » Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:39 pm
Dissident wrote:"This legitimises the club's drafting Magarey Medallist Brett Ebert in 2002 as his father Russell had played his 200th game with the Magpies before 1997."
Crap. Utter crap.
Changing a rule AFTER the fact doesn't make it right at the time the screw-up happened.
Does that mean that the changes made a few years ago, illegitamise Jonathan Brown being at Brisbane ?
by Blue Boy » Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:49 pm
by Macca19 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:16 pm
Dissident wrote:Blue Boy wrote:I wonder if the crows had of just kept silent on this - they could of just picked him up on the father son rule and then just went oops sorry our miscalculation and taken the fine.
Could have worked, but it was the Power who brought it in the attention of the AFL (VFL?)
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:31 pm
stan wrote:Without really knowing how the F/S rule works im in no positiion to comment on that issue. The issue I can talk about is the fact that poor bryce might end up going to carlton or richmond. Poor kid!
by stan » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:51 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:stan wrote:Without really knowing how the F/S rule works im in no positiion to comment on that issue. The issue I can talk about is the fact that poor bryce might end up going to carlton or richmond. Poor kid!
Which would be the case if his father hadn't played footy at all. Has anyone considered that maybe Bryce Gibbs isn't rated so highly by other clubs and either Port or the Crows may get him anyway? I've seen Gibbs play. He's a good kid but IMHO he's not in the class of a Deledio or a Hodge who were previous 1 picks. There may be other players running around elsewhere in Australia who are rated higher. This is storm in a tea cup stuff.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:53 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Dissident » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:28 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:What I can't work out is-
Port have Father/Son access to North Adelaide, West Adelaide, Woodville, West Torrens, Central Districts & Port Adelaide.
Crows have Glenelg, South Adelaide, Sturt & Norwood.
6 v 4. You'd think there'd be a 5/5 split? Throw West Adelaide to the Crows & make it even. Not rocket surgery.
by TroyGFC » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:32 pm
6 v 4. You'd think there'd be a 5/5 split?
by sydney-dog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:03 pm
by stan » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:56 pm
sydney-dog wrote:I think the changes are laughable
honestly the AFL would of saved greater face by making no amendments at all
In regards to recent selections, only Brown, Cousins and Ablett are worth any value, while Watson and Waite are on the way up.....
Others such as the Clokes and Shaw's are only worth a third round draft pick at best
by sydney-dog » Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |