SA Footy

Ah we've all had a stoush with a mate at some time lol

Booney wrote:Reports are Cordy gave Boyd some lip about getting money for nothing....Boyd gave him one.

They are also reportedly best mates and remain that way, just a little hiccup wrapped up with some home truths.

Bad luck for the lad really. If he played for Hawthorn the club would be getting the club's wet lettuce leaf out for a severe slap on the wrist.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

Booney wrote:Reports are Cordy gave Boyd some lip about getting money for nothing....Boyd gave him one.

They are also reportedly best mates and remain that way, just a little hiccup wrapped up with some home truths.

Bad luck for the lad really. If he played for the highly successful Hawthorn FC the club would be getting the club's wet lettuce leaf out for a severe slap on the wrist.

regards,

REB

Obviously the Hawks do something right with player behaviour standards, maybe they have it right and all you other clubs have it wrong?
Id rather win a premiership every year than suspend players for actions that the laws of the land are designed to cover.;
The punishment is way over the top from the Bulldogs, which coincidently has only been handed down because news of the altercation got out.

Winners are grinners, Losers can please themselves
#Fawthorn

daysofourlives wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

Booney wrote:Reports are Cordy gave Boyd some lip about getting money for nothing....Boyd gave him one.

They are also reportedly best mates and remain that way, just a little hiccup wrapped up with some home truths.

Bad luck for the lad really. If he played for the highly successful Hawthorn FC the club would be getting the club's wet lettuce leaf out for a severe slap on the wrist.

regards,

REB

Obviously the Hawks do something right with player behaviour standards, maybe they have it right and all you other clubs have it wrong?
Id rather win a premiership every year than suspend players for actions that the laws of the land are designed to cover.;
The punishment is way over the top from the Bulldogs, which coincidently has only been handed down because news of the altercation got out.

Winners are grinners, Losers can please themselves
#Fawthorn

#flog

woodublieve12 wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

Booney wrote:Reports are Cordy gave Boyd some lip about getting money for nothing....Boyd gave him one.

They are also reportedly best mates and remain that way, just a little hiccup wrapped up with some home truths.

Bad luck for the lad really. If he played for the highly successful Hawthorn FC the club would be getting the club's wet lettuce leaf out for a severe slap on the wrist.

regards,

REB

Obviously the Hawks do something right with player behaviour standards, maybe they have it right and all you other clubs have it wrong?
Id rather win a premiership every year than suspend players for actions that the laws of the land are designed to cover.;
The punishment is way over the top from the Bulldogs, which coincidently has only been handed down because news of the altercation got out.

Winners are grinners, Losers can please themselves
#Fawthorn

#flog

#hehasapoint

Sydney, the moral compass of the AFL
What is it, 2 flags in the last 80 years, jealous much

Have to agree with Daisy here. The incident happened over a week ago and nothing was going to eventuate until the media got wind of it and then the Dogs had to be seen to be doing something. Not sure suspending them achieves anything or helps the team

Jim05 wrote:Have to agree with Daisy here. The incident happened over a week ago and nothing was going to eventuate until the media got wind of it and then the Dogs had to be seen to be doing something. Not sure suspending them achieves anything or helps the team

Yep. Need to be seen to be doing something about it. Thats it. Really its a nothing situationand the issue is probably the players being on the piss really.

Also theres plenty of **** about the hawks and daisy in fact really, but hiw many flags do they have in the last 10?

Maybe they are dealing with there issues in a more appropriate way?

stan wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Have to agree with Daisy here. The incident happened over a week ago and nothing was going to eventuate until the media got wind of it and then the Dogs had to be seen to be doing something. Not sure suspending them achieves anything or helps the team

Yep. Need to be seen to be doing something about it. Thats it. Really its a nothing situationand the issue is probably the players being on the piss really.

Also theres plenty of **** about the hawks and daisy in fact really, but hiw many flags do they have in the last 10?

Maybe they are dealing with there issues in a more appropriate way?

I'm a firm believer that you don't win flags with a team full of altar boys. Most successful sides have a bit of mongrel and misbehaviour in their ranks.

daysofourlives wrote:Sydney, the moral compass of the AFL
What is it, 2 flags in the last 80 years, jealous much

Jealous?? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Could the essendon suspended recruit return this year and play finals after September 13th

marbles wrote:Could the essendon suspended recruit return this year and play finals after September 13th

They would have to win Thursday night first and then would you play a guy that has not been at the club at all for the entire year?

marbles wrote:Could the essendon suspended recruit return this year and play finals after September 13th

No because the ban isn't up until November 13th. They can go back and train 2 months early but can't compete. Would only be available if the appeal decision was handed down now

F..k me they are still having a whinge about Talia brothers...

MW wrote:F..k me they are still having a whinge about Talia brothers...

Are they whingeing or did a reporter write an article about the incident?

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

MW wrote:F..k me they are still having a whinge about Talia brothers...

Are they whingeing or did a reporter write an article about the incident?

And how do you think he got access to the Bulldogs separate investigation...
The fact they had an investigation into the AFL investigation...no not whinging at all.
But Beveridge is a swell guy so we must believe him and not one other person

MW wrote:

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

MW wrote:F..k me they are still having a whinge about Talia brothers...

Are they whingeing or did a reporter write an article about the incident?

And how do you think he got access to the Bulldogs separate investigation...
The fact they had an investigation into the AFL investigation...no not whinging at all.
But Beveridge is a swell guy so we must believe him and not one other person

What the hell are you talking about? This happened last year, not this morning.

I'm not sure who is whinging more. Wait, the stewards are moving out of the committee room.

The judges have reviewed the images and it's MW by a nose.

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

MW wrote:

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

MW wrote:F..k me they are still having a whinge about Talia brothers...

Are they whingeing or did a reporter write an article about the incident?

And how do you think he got access to the Bulldogs separate investigation...
The fact they had an investigation into the AFL investigation...no not whinging at all.
But Beveridge is a swell guy so we must believe him and not one other person

What the hell are you talking about? This happened last year, not this morning.

Don't be so naive

Booney wrote:I'm not sure who is whinging more. Wait, the stewards are moving out of the committee room.

The judges have reviewed the images and it's MW by a nose.

Always performs well in the Imbecile Stakes