SA Footy

kneedeepinthehoopla wrote:

CoverKing wrote:Duryea subbed out with a shoulder injury.

I agree though that the MRP looks to much at the injury sustained. Eg: Ted Richards incident. If he was subbed off with concussion, Schulz probably would of got 3 down to 2. He wasn't, then Schulz got off. Richards still missed the next game with concussion despite a 10 day break

And Gray played days later.

That's not relevant. Concussion has no rules, no time frames or set days for recovery. It's a very individual thing.

WC run home:
Coll Away
Syd Home
GC A
Haw H
Freo
WB H
Adel A
St K H

4 of their last 5 at home
Right now on current form, I have them winning at least 5.
Syd, Haw & Freo the possible losses.

We have had a nice draw more so than this being a representation of where we are at.

stan wrote:We have had a nice draw more so than this being a representation of where we are at.

I didnt realise how favourable the draw was for WC until I just checked - all wins apart from Richmond and GWS your wins have come from sides outside the top 8 (Crows were in when you beat them though). Others wins - Carlton, Bris, Port, GC, St Kilda, Geelong, Ess and Melb - BUT - when they win they win well best % in the comp so they are kicking big scores against these sides so not just winning and havent been smacked off the park in the losses. The run home will see where they are at but I think they are looking pretty good at present.

Booney wrote:

kneedeepinthehoopla wrote:

CoverKing wrote:Duryea subbed out with a shoulder injury.

I agree though that the MRP looks to much at the injury sustained. Eg: Ted Richards incident. If he was subbed off with concussion, Schulz probably would of got 3 down to 2. He wasn't, then Schulz got off. Richards still missed the next game with concussion despite a 10 day break

And Gray played days later.

That's not relevant. Concussion has no rules, no time frames or set days for recovery. It's a very individual thing.

Correct.
Which is why it's hard to understand why the mrp takes into account the result of collisions/incidents more so than the action.

Selwood got 1
Mitchell $1000
Fyfe $1500
Adams 2 games
Howe Cleared.

helicopterking wrote:Selwood got 1
Mitchell $1000
Fyfe $1500
Adams 2 games
Howe Cleared.

Didn't see whatever Howe did but the rest seem about right to me.

bennymacca wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Selwood got 1
Mitchell $1000
Fyfe $1500
Adams 2 games
Howe Cleared.

Didn't see whatever Howe did but the rest seem about right to me.

Tackled a bloke who hit the back of his head,on the ground and got subbed out. Nothing at all in it.
Add a couple more

Vickery 2 weeks- Tosser
Petrie 1 week.- Striking

Mitchell - AFL lovechild

Vickery 2 weeks for that and Tippett and Franklin 1 for theirs. Get real AFL

Afl has come out today and admitted the Jay Schultz tackle should have received a ban.

The fines issued are an absolute F*******G JOKE !!!!!!!!
Fines should be for crap like abusive language, Bad hair dos and revealing tattoos.
When it comes to PHYSICAL indiscretions you should either be fined guilty resulting in suspensions or not guilty.
This fine rubbish for kneeing, high contact etc is utter RUBBISH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Basically saying, yeah, its fine to go out on the field and do a dirty dog act but you'll pay a few dollars for the pleasure.
What a PATHETIC tribunal system the AFL have.
At least if you're gonna fine someone at least make it relevant! $1000 or $1500 is just simply so pathetically minimal compared to what these guys are on, it would have no effect on them at all.
F***WHITS the lot of them!

MJ_23 wrote:Vickery 2 weeks for that and Tippett and Franklin 1 for theirs. Get real AFL

BIGGEST JOKE OF ALL TIME THAT ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vickery 2 weeks for Jamieson not having any awareness, what a joke

jackpot jim wrote:

MJ_23 wrote:Vickery 2 weeks for that and Tippett and Franklin 1 for theirs. Get real AFL

BIGGEST JOKE OF ALL TIME THAT ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's because he had an existing bad record.

Do you guys actually read the MRP findings or just fly off the handle?

Jim05 wrote:Vickery 2 weeks for Jamieson not having any awareness, what a joke

If he had no awareness then there was no need to bump him. If you hit someone in the head you get suspended.

bennymacca wrote:

jackpot jim wrote:

MJ_23 wrote:Vickery 2 weeks for that and Tippett and Franklin 1 for theirs. Get real AFL

BIGGEST JOKE OF ALL TIME THAT ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's because he had an existing bad record.

Do you guys actually read the MRP findings or just fly off the handle?

Read it every week, because it changes every week.

Its a joke.

Do you think he should have got 1 week?

MJ_23 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

jackpot jim wrote:

MJ_23 wrote:Vickery 2 weeks for that and Tippett and Franklin 1 for theirs. Get real AFL

BIGGEST JOKE OF ALL TIME THAT ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's because he had an existing bad record.

Do you guys actually read the MRP findings or just fly off the handle?

Read it every week, because it changes every week.

Its a joke.

He got the same penalty as Tippet and Franklin, equals consistency, isnt that what you want?

You are speaking way too much sense lately days. It worries me