Re: Port Adelaide 2019
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
Westhoff was entitled to punch the ball over the line for a throw in. His foot was on the line, so it was a very close call as to whether the ball had crossed the line or not. The 50m penalty was ridiculous.
Dutchy wrote:How does he waste time when the clock stopped either way??
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Westhoff was entitled to punch the ball over the line for a throw in. His foot was on the line, so it was a very close call as to whether the ball had crossed the line or not. The 50m penalty was ridiculous.
Booney wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Westhoff was entitled to punch the ball over the line for a throw in. His foot was on the line, so it was a very close call as to whether the ball had crossed the line or not. The 50m penalty was ridiculous.
This. Literally a line ball decision.
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:How does he waste time when the clock stopped either way??
If it was out on the full its wasting time to get the ball back to take the free - gives the oppo time to set back up in defense
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Westhoff was entitled to punch the ball over the line for a throw in. His foot was on the line, so it was a very close call as to whether the ball had crossed the line or not. The 50m penalty was ridiculous.
This. Literally a line ball decision.
The ball was clearly floating out of bounds and he did it out of frustration. Not really such a big deal.
Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:How does he waste time when the clock stopped either way??
If it was out on the full its wasting time to get the ball back to take the free - gives the oppo time to set back up in defense
There was no Richmond player behind where the ball was going so they would have had time anyway.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:How does he waste time when the clock stopped either way??
If it was out on the full its wasting time to get the ball back to take the free - gives the oppo time to set back up in defense
There was no Richmond player behind where the ball was going so they would have had time anyway.
It cost us the 4 points.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:How does he waste time when the clock stopped either way??
If it was out on the full its wasting time to get the ball back to take the free - gives the oppo time to set back up in defense
There was no Richmond player behind where the ball was going so they would have had time anyway.
It cost us the 4 points.
Booney wrote:Dixon and Motlop dropped.
Ryder and Garner in.
Booney wrote:Dixon and Motlop dropped.
Ryder and Garner in.
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:Dixon and Motlop dropped.
Ryder and Garner in.
What’s the go with Dixon?
Isn’t he slowly building form?
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:Dixon and Motlop dropped.
Ryder and Garner in.
What’s the go with Dixon?
Isn’t he slowly building form?
Dutchy wrote:AFL have stepped in to take control of Port's finances.
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:Dixon and Motlop dropped.
Ryder and Garner in.
What’s the go with Dixon?
Isn’t he slowly building form?
Never expected him to see the year out after what he's come back from. No preseason, slow build to some fitness but now he looks cooked and as LM rightly notes we're not exactly helping him.
Brodlach wrote:I keep hearing Dixon has issues outside the club, any ideas?