by PatowalongaPirate » Tue Aug 27, 2019 11:04 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 27, 2019 11:09 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Ryder heading to Moorabbin.
by Armchair expert » Tue Aug 27, 2019 11:46 pm
by LMA » Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:19 am
Armchair expert wrote:They don’t need him with Rohan Marshall having a break out season
by Booney » Wed Aug 28, 2019 8:54 am
Armchair expert wrote:They don’t need him with Rohan Marshall having a break out season
by stan » Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:10 am
I see why the saints would be looking at him but they don't want to hinder his development by adding Ryder to the mix. But hey might suit all who knows really.Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:They don’t need him with Rohan Marshall having a break out season
A young ruckman who has played a handful of good games isn't the basket to put all your eggs in, plus, if they lose Bruce as rumored they'll be short up front, too.
by woodublieve12 » Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:26 am
by Brodlach » Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:31 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Armchair expert » Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:46 am
stan wrote:I see why the saints would be looking at him but they don't want to hinder his development by adding Ryder to the mix. But hey might suit all who knows really.Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:They don’t need him with Rohan Marshall having a break out season
A young ruckman who has played a handful of good games isn't the basket to put all your eggs in, plus, if they lose Bruce as rumored they'll be short up front, too.
by Eagles2014 » Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:52 pm
by JK » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:44 am
Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
by Booney » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:59 am
Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
by whufc » Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:23 am
Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
by LMA » Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:29 am
Booney wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
I'm a massive Farrell fan, I think he's got a real future ahead of him yet I agree with you and JK. He's not yet established himself ( I expect him to next year ) and sometimes if you rate a talent and want to lock it away you add a year to do so. He's R Gray's replacement, I'm not saying he's going to be another Robbie Gray, but he's the mid/fwd that can play either IMO.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:38 am
whufc wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
Because the players have the most power under the current system in place. If Port don't give him a 3 year contract one of the other 239 AFL teams will be willing to take a crack.
by JK » Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:09 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:Why do clubs give three year contracts to fringe type players?
Can understand giving Bonner two years, but why not give Farrel two as well, not three like he got?
He has not proved anything yet, make them work a bit harder first I reckon.
Because the players have the most power under the current system in place. If Port don't give him a 3 year contract one of the other 239 AFL teams will be willing to take a crack.
So they should, we as people are able to pick and choose what jobs we apply for and you can get thrown on the scrap heap instantly as an AFL player, you've gotta get the best deal while you can, retirement is permanent.
by Booney » Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:16 am
JK wrote:I agree, but think both sides of an agreement should have some degree of power. So if players can move before fulfilling their contractual obligation I reckon clubs should be able to trade them without requiring consent.
by Rik E Boy » Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:52 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Gee it hasn't been a good week for Adelaide clubs
by Brodlach » Thu Aug 29, 2019 11:15 am
Rik E Boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee it hasn't been a good week for Adelaide clubs
That's hardly news
Regards,
REB
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by woodublieve12 » Thu Aug 29, 2019 11:19 am
Brodlach wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee it hasn't been a good week for Adelaide clubs
That's hardly news
Regards,
REB
It’s like porn for some people
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |