SA Footy

Wedgie wrote:There was no difference in the comp between 1989 and 1990 when it changed its name except for the fact it was one year older!
Surely you're just trolling.
Is Hertier Lumumba only one year old?

I was agreeing with you, my post wasn't that clear

People who count up the 'AFL flags' aren't saying that the others don't count, they are just drawing a convenient line between when the 'modern' era starts.

regards,

REB

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:The bloody league changed its name from VFL to AFL, not its history. Jesus its not that hard to understand.

Pretty simple

X2

whufc wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:The bloody league changed its name from VFL to AFL, not its history. Jesus its not that hard to understand.

Pretty simple

X2

Using that logic PAFC simply went from the SANFL to the AFL in 1997, when we know that the Port Power was created in 1997 and the PAFC stayed in the SANFL

Sorry totally new league in 1990.

Pretty Simple really.

We are now into the post-modern AFL era, which began in 2012 with the introduction of the 18th team. All records heretoforth are to be expunged from your memories.

am Bays wrote:

whufc wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:The bloody league changed its name from VFL to AFL, not its history. Jesus its not that hard to understand.

Pretty simple

X2

Using that logic PAFC simply went from the SANFL to the AFL in 1997, when we know that the Port Power was created in 1997 and the PAFC stayed in the SANFL

Sorry totally new league in 1990.

Pretty Simple really.

The AFL is nothing more than a rebranded VFL

If the SANFL at the end of the year decided to drop the 'N' and become the SAFL, therefore changing all their merchandise, marketing etc to fit would the 100 years of history before hand be dropped

Actually the bay's premiership tally would be fairly similar

Q. wrote:We are now into the post-modern AFL era, which began in 2012 with the introduction of the 18th team. All records heretoforth are to be expunged from your memories.

Ahhh, some Post-modern Realism, with an existential crisis thrown in for good measure....

am Bays wrote:

whufc wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:The bloody league changed its name from VFL to AFL, not its history. Jesus its not that hard to understand.

Pretty simple

X2

Using that logic PAFC simply went from the SANFL to the AFL in 1997, when we know that the Port Power was created in 1997 and the PAFC stayed in the SANFL

Sorry totally new league in 1990.

Pretty Simple really.

Quite the opposite, the logic dictates the PAFC changed their name to the PAMFC in 1996 , a club that has since become defunct.
The new entity took someone else's name and have no right to claim on the history of the original PAFC which has since become defunct.
Extremely simple.

am Bays wrote:

whufc wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:The bloody league changed its name from VFL to AFL, not its history. Jesus its not that hard to understand.

Pretty simple

X2

Using that logic PAFC simply went from the SANFL to the AFL in 1997, when we know that the Port Power was created in 1997 and the PAFC stayed in the SANFL

Sorry totally new league in 1990.

Pretty Simple really.

False, the AFL was a name change only.
The comittee members were the same and all financials were kept the same. It wasnt like the A-League which started fresh

seriously, piss off out of my thread with this stuff

Port can claim both entities and premierships regardless of the legal definition. So can Hawthorn.

Lets get back to bagging port for their 10,000 pet memberships instead

bennymacca wrote:seriously, piss off out of my thread with this stuff

Port can claim both entities and premierships regardless of the legal definition. So can Hawthorn.

Lets get back to bagging port for their 10,000 pet memberships instead

Kochie cleared that number up, saying we only have 500 on the books.

Wouldn't think Fages would bother clarifying how many 4 legged 19th friends are on the books at the AFC- the number is meaningless anyway

Was just repeating the friendly ribbing danger tweeted

Funny tho that it doesnt matter and insignificant now.

another grub wrote:Funny tho that it doesnt matter and insignificant now.

...or that it's more important than on field performance it seems to port
now they won't be playing finals.

Spargo wrote:

another grub wrote:Funny tho that it doesnt matter and insignificant now.

...or that it's more important than on field performance it seems to port
now they won't be playing finals.

That's just a stupid comment. From where we were having over 50, 000 members needs due recognition.

On field is and always will be the ultimate measure.

Booney wrote:

Spargo wrote:

another grub wrote:Funny tho that it doesnt matter and insignificant now.

...or that it's more important than on field performance it seems to port
now they won't be playing finals.

That's just a stupid comment. From where we were having over 50, 000 members needs due recognition.

On field is and always will be the ultimate measure.

My god, haven't you had enough recognition already? It's all we've heard about all season, "our crowds are greater, our membership's better than yours", waa waa waa. If it makes you feel better then good on you, but surely enough self back patting is enough.
What IS stupid (and pathetic) is when a club downplays having less members yet highlights on field performance but is quite happy to do the opposite the following year when the situation changes & it suits them.

Blah blah blah.
sick of this shit.
Did Port decide to sell more 3-game memberships rather than commit one seat to one person for 11 games? yes. Did it most likely create more members in 2015? Yes.
Does it affect the Crows bottom line? No
Move on.

Spargo wrote:My god, haven't you had enough recognition already? It's all we've heard about all season, "our crowds are greater, our membership's better than yours", waa waa waa. If it makes you feel better then good on you, but surely enough self back patting is enough.
What IS stupid (and pathetic) is when a club downplays having less members yet highlights on field performance but is quite happy to do the opposite the following year when the situation changes & it suits them.

Excellent, if you could forward a copy of your book on how to run an AFL club I'll be sure to pass it on to the relevant people.