by Q. » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:04 pm
by Punk Rooster » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:21 pm
dedja wrote:Mick is pissing himself ...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:21 pm
smac wrote:What crap. That's just loser speak.
by gadj1976 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:29 pm
Jim05 wrote:smac wrote:What crap. That's just loser speak.
Whats crap about it.
Only 1 can win the flag, the rest are failures.
And he is probably correct that they were not a real chance.
The top 4 this year are miles ahead of the rest
by smac » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:41 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:44 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Jim05 wrote:smac wrote:What crap. That's just loser speak.
Whats crap about it.
Only 1 can win the flag, the rest are failures.
And he is probably correct that they were not a real chance.
The top 4 this year are miles ahead of the rest
Failures?
That's a subjective measurement.
Are Port a failure?
by Q. » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:49 pm
smac wrote:What crap. That's just loser speak.
by gadj1976 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:51 pm
Jim05 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Jim05 wrote:smac wrote:What crap. That's just loser speak.
Whats crap about it.
Only 1 can win the flag, the rest are failures.
And he is probably correct that they were not a real chance.
The top 4 this year are miles ahead of the rest
Failures?
That's a subjective measurement.
Are Port a failure?
Improved massively on last year but at the end of the day there is 1 winner and 17 losers
by Brumbies » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:01 pm
test wrote:I'd say Didaks gone but I'm not sure after that, it will be interesting to see how it plays out
by gadj1976 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:19 pm
Brumbies wrote:test wrote:I'd say Didaks gone but I'm not sure after that, it will be interesting to see how it plays out
Heard from a friend of Didaks family today that he may be at Carlton next year.
Whether this is true or not, I can't see him playing at Collingwood next year.
by Turbo » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:39 pm
by Punk Rooster » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:42 pm
Turbo wrote:Hmm the Malthouse succession plan is looking pretty ordinary 2 years after the fact.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Q. » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:54 pm
Turbo wrote:Hmm the Malthouse succession plan is looking pretty ordinary 2 years after the fact.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:35 pm
Q. wrote:Turbo wrote:Hmm the Malthouse succession plan is looking pretty ordinary 2 years after the fact.
IMO he's got three more years to get another premiership, then it's time to look elsewhere.
by Q. » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:40 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Q. wrote:Turbo wrote:Hmm the Malthouse succession plan is looking pretty ordinary 2 years after the fact.
IMO he's got three more years to get another premiership, then it's time to look elsewhere.
5 years to take a team too a premiership, even when taking over a team ready to win one. Very generous.
by Turbo » Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:58 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Turbo wrote:Hmm the Malthouse succession plan is looking pretty ordinary 2 years after the fact.
the one Carlton decided upon?
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:01 am
Q. wrote:Disposal efficiency just isn't good enough to be a contender
by Q. » Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:03 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:03 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |