The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of the Crow supporter is amusing. On one hand they want a future star or established senior footballer and on the other hand are saying Tippett isn't worth what they "think" Sydney is going to pay him.
"like"
by am Bays » Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:51 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of the Crow supporter is amusing. On one hand they want a future star or established senior footballer and on the other hand are saying Tippett isn't worth what they "think" Sydney is going to pay him.
by the joker » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:04 pm
by woodublieve12 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:07 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:The hypocrisy of the Crow supporter is amusing. On one hand they want a future star or established senior footballer and on the other hand are saying Tippett isn't worth what they "think" Sydney is going to pay him.
by woodublieve12 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:09 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Mop Up wrote:Sydney CEO says Mitchell will not be involved in any Tippet Trade.
Ruled out Premiership players in the first few days....
What next.. Draft picks?
Does he understand how trades work.... seems to want the world and pay peanuts!
Guy needs to stop trying to hog the limelight and let the list managers go about their business
I reckon Sydney know how the trade works.![]()
Would you like some "tips".
by Tassie Blues » Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:41 pm
by JK » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:52 pm
Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
by scoob » Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:34 pm
Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
by Tassie Blues » Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:59 pm
scoob wrote:Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
The lad wants to pay for them and not the crows. Hence they are in the box seat, crows fault for not giving kt what he wanted. Suck eggs crows.
by Interceptor » Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:23 am
scoob wrote:Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
The lad wants to pay for them and not the crows. Hence they are in the box seat, crows fault for not giving kt what he wanted. Suck eggs crows.
by LaughingKookaburra » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:24 am
scoob wrote:Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
The lad wants to pay for them and not the crows. Hence they are in the box seat, crows fault for not giving kt what he wanted. Suck eggs crows.
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:36 am
by Banker » Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:13 am
by NO-MERCY » Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:26 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Does everyone know for sure what Tippett will be paid or is everyone just guessing?
Personally I'm not fussed if Sydney get him or not, but I am enjoying the "process".
by gossipgirl » Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:47 am
by scoob » Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:51 am
Interceptor wrote:scoob wrote:Tassie Blues wrote:The hypocrisy of Sydney is amusing. On one hand they want a “star” player who will be there highest payed player and on the other hand they are only willing to give up pick 22.
The lad wants to pay for them and not the crows. Hence they are in the box seat, crows fault for not giving kt what he wanted. Suck eggs crows.
Ignorant comment from someone who won't nominate who they support
by AFLflyer » Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:30 am
by Hondo » Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:59 am
by scoob » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:05 am
Hondo wrote:I think this could end up as a mega deal with multiple clubs
You can't tell me every single player of trade value at the Swans would not consider a switch even it was to a Melbourne club (ie, Reid)
One of those third party clubs may just have the missing link in the trade puzzle.
I'd love to go back in time and see how reasonable Swans fans were when Rocca and Grant walked out.
by Bigshow82 » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:17 am
Banker wrote:Adelaide need Gold Coast to come out and say they will take Tippett in the pre-season draft, even if Tippett wants to go to Sydney.
This would force Sydney to trade for Tippett.
At the moment, Sydney dont have to offer anything
by westcoastpanther » Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:22 am
scoob wrote:Hondo wrote:I think this could end up as a mega deal with multiple clubs
You can't tell me every single player of trade value at the Swans would not consider a switch even it was to a Melbourne club (ie, Reid)
One of those third party clubs may just have the missing link in the trade puzzle.
I'd love to go back in time and see how reasonable Swans fans were when Rocca and Grant walked out.
I would be sure the SMH didn't print their faces on a dart board...![]()
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |