Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Talk on the national game

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby scoob » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:50 am

Grahaml wrote:I would have thought that Kurt would want to help his mates where he could by making sure Adelaide got at least a reasonable trade for him. But all this talk is making it harder and harder for that to happen. Sydney can now refuse to deal knowing they can bet him for free in the PSD.

The AFL needs to look at this situation, you can't have a virtual unrestricted free agency without any compensation. Adelaide should get something for him, by pay he should be assessed a top 10 pick (probably even around 4 or 5). The fact the player can refuse a trade and then nominating his pay have so much control over his final destination skews the whole system.

After the initial contract, all players should become restricted free agents until they are unrestricted. The AFL say he's worth say pick 7 in the draft, if Sydney don't come up with a good trade, Adelaide take the pick. Sydney get the player, the player gets his club and the original club gets some sort of fair compensation.


Its been like this for years - now the AFL must look at it because the Crows have the wrong end of the deal? :roll:
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby overloaded » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:56 am

Psyber wrote:
HH3 wrote:
Psyber wrote:
overloaded wrote:Adelaide in an awkward position here now GWS are out of the picture.
They will end up taking a carp deal from Sydney
Where did you get that? The AFL site this morning suggested GWS were actively interested.
They said on the radio that GWS was going to go very hard to get him as well. If I was Adelaide I would can talks with the Swans and work solely on getting a deal done with GWS. Then even if Tippett refuses to go to GWS, they'll just pick him up in the PSD anyway.
That fits with what I read.
I suspect "overloaded" is one of those Port supporters always wishing the Crows ill from being overloaded with resentment of the Crows relatively better form in the AFL, and Port not getting the first licence... ;)


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/ku ... 6497283511
Apologies will be accepted
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....

I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
overloaded
2009 Punting Comp Winner
 
 
Posts: 6909
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am
Location: far queue
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Zorro » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:05 pm

scoob wrote:
Grahaml wrote:I would have thought that Kurt would want to help his mates where he could by making sure Adelaide got at least a reasonable trade for him. But all this talk is making it harder and harder for that to happen. Sydney can now refuse to deal knowing they can bet him for free in the PSD.

The AFL needs to look at this situation, you can't have a virtual unrestricted free agency without any compensation. Adelaide should get something for him, by pay he should be assessed a top 10 pick (probably even around 4 or 5). The fact the player can refuse a trade and then nominating his pay have so much control over his final destination skews the whole system.

After the initial contract, all players should become restricted free agents until they are unrestricted. The AFL say he's worth say pick 7 in the draft, if Sydney don't come up with a good trade, Adelaide take the pick. Sydney get the player, the player gets his club and the original club gets some sort of fair compensation.


Its been like this for years - now the AFL must look at it because the Crows have the wrong end of the deal? :roll:


I can't see anywhere in Graham's post where he suggests this is the first time it has happened. Yes it has happened for years and Tippett is manipulating the system to suit himself right now, which is why we're analysing it right now.

Crows supporters are annoyed, just like supporters from every other club have been annoyed when it has happened to them :roll:
The Cocks Will Rise Again
User avatar
Zorro
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:42 pm
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 52 times

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Mr Beefy » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:18 pm

scoob wrote:
Grahaml wrote:I would have thought that Kurt would want to help his mates where he could by making sure Adelaide got at least a reasonable trade for him. But all this talk is making it harder and harder for that to happen. Sydney can now refuse to deal knowing they can bet him for free in the PSD.

The AFL needs to look at this situation, you can't have a virtual unrestricted free agency without any compensation. Adelaide should get something for him, by pay he should be assessed a top 10 pick (probably even around 4 or 5). The fact the player can refuse a trade and then nominating his pay have so much control over his final destination skews the whole system.

After the initial contract, all players should become restricted free agents until they are unrestricted. The AFL say he's worth say pick 7 in the draft, if Sydney don't come up with a good trade, Adelaide take the pick. Sydney get the player, the player gets his club and the original club gets some sort of fair compensation.


Its been like this for years - now the AFL must look at it because the Crows have the wrong end of the deal? :roll:

Surely, if tippetts contract has expired he is free to go in the psd. The same as blokes who dont get offered a new contract. He has fulfilled his contractual obligation.
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5155
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 412 times
Been liked: 681 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Bigshow82 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:28 pm

It could be interesting to see what happens if he does make his way to the PSD. Everyone says he will be on close to $1M a year at Sydney but Sydney have come out and said he will be payed less than if he stayed in Adelaide. Maybe Sydney would struggle with his price tag if he puts to much on his own head? I'm starting to think his contract offer from Sydney maybe heavily weighted towards the end of the contract so some other highly paid players may have retired by then. If he puts a $1M a year figure on his head moving into the PSD does that mean he has to be paid $1M the next year or its ok as long as over the duration of his contract he averages the $1M a year?

***Just using the $1M figure as an example***
Bigshow82
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:52 pm
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 35 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Squids » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:36 pm

I understand what you are saying there Bigshow82. Yes they can front end his contract where he could average 1m a year but be paid 2m,1,1,500k,500k in each year for example. This could be something GWS do as their kids are probably not yet at the stage where they can demand the huge dollars.
Image
User avatar
Squids
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7539
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:47 pm
Location: mod city
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 205 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby TEX07 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:24 pm

Zorro wrote:
scoob wrote:
Grahaml wrote:I would have thought that Kurt would want to help his mates where he could by making sure Adelaide got at least a reasonable trade for him. But all this talk is making it harder and harder for that to happen. Sydney can now refuse to deal knowing they can bet him for free in the PSD.

The AFL needs to look at this situation, you can't have a virtual unrestricted free agency without any compensation. Adelaide should get something for him, by pay he should be assessed a top 10 pick (probably even around 4 or 5). The fact the player can refuse a trade and then nominating his pay have so much control over his final destination skews the whole system.

After the initial contract, all players should become restricted free agents until they are unrestricted. The AFL say he's worth say pick 7 in the draft, if Sydney don't come up with a good trade, Adelaide take the pick. Sydney get the player, the player gets his club and the original club gets some sort of fair compensation.


Its been like this for years - now the AFL must look at it because the Crows have the wrong end of the deal? :roll:


I can't see anywhere in Graham's post where he suggests this is the first time it has happened. Yes it has happened for years and Tippett is manipulating the system to suit himself right now, which is why we're analysing it right now.

Crows supporters are annoyed, just like supporters from every other club have been annoyed when it has happened to them :roll:


In the previous years there has also been no free agency which is now in place. If he had played two more years he could do this as a restricted free agent and all that had to happen was Sydney offer him $$ and if the Crows dont want to or cant match he walks. The AFL would then decide on the Crows compensation (i believe??).
Heard he has said he will only go to Sydney today? If GWS want him and they are able to offer what he wants then I thought that he has to go there? Or sit out of footy altogether?
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Sky Pilot » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:59 pm

Its very untidy for the young bloke. I just hope he ends up making a big quid to help set himself up for life but then misses out on a premiership while the Crows snatch one. Sort of like Buckley missing out hahahahaha. Evil I know, but justified
People who bought this book also bought a stool and some rope. Unknown literary critic
User avatar
Sky Pilot
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Stone Hut Bakery
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: BMW

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby TEX07 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:02 pm

Apparantely Jesse White was here today doing testing? I would take him and pick 22 for Tippett. This is better than getting nothing and puts the whole thing to bed. White hasnt shown a heap at Sydney but players have been given opportunities at other clubs and gone up a level. He doesnt have the potential of Tippett but Tippett is gone so it is really irrelevant comparing them now anyway. Sydney are not going to give up a player like Reid which would be the closest like for like and in the end they dont have to so White and pick 22 would be ok IMO.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Dols » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:23 pm

TEX07 wrote:Apparantely Jesse White was here today doing testing? I would take him and pick 22 for Tippett. This is better than getting nothing and puts the whole thing to bed. White hasnt shown a heap at Sydney but players have been given opportunities at other clubs and gone up a level. He doesnt have the potential of Tippett but Tippett is gone so it is really irrelevant comparing them now anyway. Sydney are not going to give up a player like Reid which would be the closest like for like and in the end they dont have to so White and pick 22 would be ok IMO.

correct me if I am wrong but the crows only have 3 positions left on there roster. If they except white then they have to delist someone before the draft in order to have the required 3 selections?
User avatar
Dols
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 869
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:40 pm
Has liked: 332 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby LaughingKookaburra » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:32 pm

Talk back in Perth suggests people here are disgusted with Tippet too.
I stick with my original statement let the prick go through the PSD Sydney can stick 22 up their arse. Footy gods exist and Sydney will be the loser in coming years paying the bloke inflated money leaving their depth tested.
I'm not pissed off he's going but the way he has held Adelaide @ ransom is a disgrace. I know how Collingwood feel with Cloke and how port did with Stevens now.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6254
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:22 am
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 794 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby TEX07 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:04 pm

Dols wrote:
TEX07 wrote:Apparantely Jesse White was here today doing testing? I would take him and pick 22 for Tippett. This is better than getting nothing and puts the whole thing to bed. White hasnt shown a heap at Sydney but players have been given opportunities at other clubs and gone up a level. He doesnt have the potential of Tippett but Tippett is gone so it is really irrelevant comparing them now anyway. Sydney are not going to give up a player like Reid which would be the closest like for like and in the end they dont have to so White and pick 22 would be ok IMO.

correct me if I am wrong but the crows only have 3 positions left on there roster. If they except white then they have to delist someone before the draft in order to have the required 3 selections?


Tippett would still be on thier list though wouldn't he? So they would still have three once traded. I could be wrong though.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby LMA » Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:45 pm

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Talk back in Perth suggests people here are disgusted with Tippet too.
I stick with my original statement let the prick go through the PSD Sydney can stick 22 up their arse. Footy gods exist and Sydney will be the loser in coming years paying the bloke inflated money leaving their depth tested.
I'm not pissed off he's going but the way he has held Adelaide @ ransom is a disgrace. I know how Collingwood feel with Cloke and how port did with Stevens now.


Big ego's and greed usually comes back and bites you on the bum in footy, we all know what happened the year after Stevens left :lol:
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Dols » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:27 am

TEX07 wrote:
Dols wrote:
TEX07 wrote:Apparantely Jesse White was here today doing testing? I would take him and pick 22 for Tippett. This is better than getting nothing and puts the whole thing to bed. White hasnt shown a heap at Sydney but players have been given opportunities at other clubs and gone up a level. He doesnt have the potential of Tippett but Tippett is gone so it is really irrelevant comparing them now anyway. Sydney are not going to give up a player like Reid which would be the closest like for like and in the end they dont have to so White and pick 22 would be ok IMO.

correct me if I am wrong but the crows only have 3 positions left on there roster. If they except white then they have to delist someone before the draft in order to have the required 3 selections?


Tippett would still be on thier list though wouldn't he? So they would still have three once traded. I could be wrong though.

unsure about that as he doesn't have a contract
User avatar
Dols
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 869
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:40 pm
Has liked: 332 times
Been liked: 51 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Sorry Dude » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:20 am

Dols wrote:
TEX07 wrote:
Dols wrote:
TEX07 wrote:Apparantely Jesse White was here today doing testing? I would take him and pick 22 for Tippett. This is better than getting nothing and puts the whole thing to bed. White hasnt shown a heap at Sydney but players have been given opportunities at other clubs and gone up a level. He doesnt have the potential of Tippett but Tippett is gone so it is really irrelevant comparing them now anyway. Sydney are not going to give up a player like Reid which would be the closest like for like and in the end they dont have to so White and pick 22 would be ok IMO.

correct me if I am wrong but the crows only have 3 positions left on there roster. If they except white then they have to delist someone before the draft in order to have the required 3 selections?


Tippett would still be on thier list though wouldn't he? So they would still have three once traded. I could be wrong though.

unsure about that as he doesn't have a contract


he is still a listed player. if the crows receive a player in the draft they still have 3 spots left on their list.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Magpiespower » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:21 am

Everyone can eat s#!t! A big bag of s#!t! I'm the greatest man in the world!
User avatar
Magpiespower
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6292
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 125 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby Panther32 » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:29 am

Tippett for Jesse White and first round pick was all but confirmed this morning.
The only time i've ever been wrong...was when I thought I was wrong!!!
User avatar
Panther32
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:06 pm
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 13 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby gossipgirl » Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:05 pm

:(
Panther32 wrote:Tippett for Jesse White and first round pick was all but confirmed this morning.


unfortunately we have just bent over and been shafted again.
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1535 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby woodublieve12 » Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:24 pm

Fair trade... Jesse White isn't a dud... Fit in nicely at Adelaide.
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17729
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3125 times
Been liked: 2518 times

Re: Kurt Tippett's playing future?

Postby GWW » Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:38 pm

The Crows have done well out of that, if it does eventuate.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |