SA Footy

MW wrote:IMO if Danger is staying around, we need his speed on the outside. We have Sloane, Thommo, Crouch boys to get the hard ball inside and feed it out. Yes Danger can do that but I would rather him be the link so he can run and gun with the ball

His bullshit is a blight on the Crows.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

stan wrote:

Booney wrote:Struggled without Betts last night. When is he due back? [emoji38]

He certainly had a dirty night but I thought Hawthorn put a bit of time into him. Definitely went at him most if the night.

He's a downhill skier. Electrifying when they're winning, nowhere to be seen when they struggle.

You've described every forward in the game

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:IMO if Danger is staying around, we need his speed on the outside. We have Sloane, Thommo, Crouch boys to get the hard ball inside and feed it out. Yes Danger can do that but I would rather him be the link so he can run and gun with the ball

His bullshit is a blight on the Crows.

Care to elaborate?

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:IMO if Danger is staying around, we need his speed on the outside. We have Sloane, Thommo, Crouch boys to get the hard ball inside and feed it out. Yes Danger can do that but I would rather him be the link so he can run and gun with the ball

Really? You want him burning the ball on the outside?

His career clanger count will be the highest of any player ever, I think both Crouch brothers will be better used as ball users than ball winners.

I would like to see how he goes on the outside. I think his disposal would improve rather than slamming it onto the boot getting the contested ball

stan wrote:

Booney wrote:Struggled without Betts last night. When is he due back? [emoji38]

He certainly had a dirty night but I thought Hawthorn put a bit of time into him. Definitely went at him most if the night.

Lake's hip and shoulder shephard on him looked like it effected him and blunted his impact. That was a good hit.

MW wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:IMO if Danger is staying around, we need his speed on the outside. We have Sloane, Thommo, Crouch boys to get the hard ball inside and feed it out. Yes Danger can do that but I would rather him be the link so he can run and gun with the ball

His bullshit is a blight on the Crows.

Care to elaborate?

It's a distraction to the rest of the team, I'd sooner see everyone focused on the club's performance and betterment opposed to any individual.

Get used to it...it's going to be Talia next season, then someone else after that...just the way it is now unfortunately. Doesn't help when the chief football writer for that rag we call a newspaper has an agenda

MW wrote:Get used to it...it's going to be Talia next season, then someone else after that...just the way it is now unfortunately. Doesn't help when the chief football writer for that rag we call a newspaper has an agenda

How long has it been about Dangerfield though, it was all last season too.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:Get used to it...it's going to be Talia next season, then someone else after that...just the way it is now unfortunately. Doesn't help when the chief football writer for that rag we call a newspaper has an agenda

How long has it been about Dangerfield though, it was all last season too.

If Danger was just cruising around getting 20 touches and not looking interested id say 'yep its a distraction'. facts are he is busting his ass each week getting mid to high 30 possies.

Like I said...agenda

MW wrote:Like I said...agenda

So why read it? I gave up on it years ago and as such it doesn't phase me.

Pretty simple solution.

Pity little Charlie didn't get to throw in a post goal celebration after he ballsed up that shot early in the last quarter. Was probably working on his next routine and didn't kick the important goal. It was the worst of his 6 touches for the night.

Either that or he was cooking up some spuds.

Footy Smart wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:Get used to it...it's going to be Talia next season, then someone else after that...just the way it is now unfortunately. Doesn't help when the chief football writer for that rag we call a newspaper has an agenda

How long has it been about Dangerfield though, it was all last season too.

If Danger was just cruising around getting 20 touches and not looking interested id say 'yep its a distraction'. facts are he is busting his ass each week getting mid to high 30 possies.

He's cracked the 30 mark 3 times this season.

Adelaide could be a genuine top 4 threat, hat's off to Sloaney, a more important player IMO.

Booney wrote:Pity little Charlie didn't get to throw in a post goal celebration after he ballsed up that shot early in the last quarter. Was probably working on his next routine and didn't kick the important goal. It was the worst of his 6 touches for the night.

Either that or he was cooking up some spuds.

Flog.

James Harden can do that, he's at the absolute pinnacle of his sport. Charlie Cameron, not so much.

Footy Smart wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:Get used to it...it's going to be Talia next season, then someone else after that...just the way it is now unfortunately. Doesn't help when the chief football writer for that rag we call a newspaper has an agenda

How long has it been about Dangerfield though, it was all last season too.

If Danger was just cruising around getting 20 touches and not looking interested id say 'yep its a distraction'. facts are he is busting his ass each week getting mid to high 30 possies.

If he was cruising around getting 20 touches AND using them to Adelaides advantage he'd be more useful than 30+ getting thrown/kicked to nobody.

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:Like I said...agenda

So why read it? I gave up on it years ago and as such it doesn't phase me.

Pretty simple solution.

I don't but he is fricking everywhere and people talk about it!

MW wrote:
I don't but he is fricking everywhere and people talk about it!

It's crazy, triple M yesterday in a newsflash "Paddy Dangerfield discusses contract"
Newsflash comes around and it's the same thing he's said all along......................yawn.

stan wrote:Why was Daingerfield starting forward in the last?

Why was he off the field for 5 minutes having a call with campo when the Hawks started smashing them?

Blown out of proportion. As was shown on fox footy after the game, started the first 3 centre clearances in the middle, (Lost both cleanly) and obviously ran to the wrong positions structure wise and was brought off it and told about it.

Pretty mouthy this week Booney, Port must have an easy game this week

Brodlach wrote:Pretty mouthy this week Booney, Port must have an easy game this week

No certainty either.