by LaughingKookaburra » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:25 pm
by kickinit » Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:27 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Absolutely stupid media statement from Essendon. Wasted their clubs cash by doing their own investigstion. Your investigation means stuff all!
If these injections were not taken for a reason to get an edge then why are they been taken for? It's hard not to think that Essendon knew what they were doing all along and usedthe current AFL system to defend them selves....
by Jim05 » Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:34 pm
kickinit wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Absolutely stupid media statement from Essendon. Wasted their clubs cash by doing their own investigstion. Your investigation means stuff all!
If these injections were not taken for a reason to get an edge then why are they been taken for? It's hard not to think that Essendon knew what they were doing all along and usedthe current AFL system to defend them selves....
how is the current AFL system defending them? You no under the AFL system WADA can appeal any sentence and take it completely out of the AFL hand. Basically if WADA don't like the sentences handed down to Essendon they will take them to court and get what they want.
by whufc » Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:52 pm
Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Absolutely stupid media statement from Essendon. Wasted their clubs cash by doing their own investigstion. Your investigation means stuff all!
If these injections were not taken for a reason to get an edge then why are they been taken for? It's hard not to think that Essendon knew what they were doing all along and usedthe current AFL system to defend them selves....
how is the current AFL system defending them? You no under the AFL system WADA can appeal any sentence and take it completely out of the AFL hand. Basically if WADA don't like the sentences handed down to Essendon they will take them to court and get what they want.
I may be wrong Kickinit but I am led to believe WADA cant do stuff all.
I was told the AFL can tell WADA to f**k off if they dont like the verdict because the AFL is not a member or sport that comes under their banner.
by Tassie Blues » Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:10 pm
by Turbo » Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:37 pm
by kickinit » Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:42 pm
whufc wrote:Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Absolutely stupid media statement from Essendon. Wasted their clubs cash by doing their own investigstion. Your investigation means stuff all!
If these injections were not taken for a reason to get an edge then why are they been taken for? It's hard not to think that Essendon knew what they were doing all along and usedthe current AFL system to defend them selves....
how is the current AFL system defending them? You no under the AFL system WADA can appeal any sentence and take it completely out of the AFL hand. Basically if WADA don't like the sentences handed down to Essendon they will take them to court and get what they want.
I may be wrong Kickinit but I am led to believe WADA cant do stuff all.
I was told the AFL can tell WADA to f**k off if they dont like the verdict because the AFL is not a member or sport that comes under their banner.
Yep have heard the same, something about not being an international sport, ASADA is the worry.
(e) Persons Entitled to Appeal
The parties having the right to appeal to the Appeals Board shall be as provided in the NAD Scheme but, at a minimum, shall include the following parties:
(i) the Player or other Person who is the subject of the decision being appealed;
(ii) the other party to the case in which the decision was rendered;
(iii) AFL;
(iv) ASADA; and
(v) WADA.
ASADA and WADA shall also have the right to appeal to CAS with respect to the decision of the Appeals Board. Any party filing an appeal shall be entitled to assistance from CAS to obtain all relevant information from the Anti-Doping Organisation whose decision is being appealed and the information shall be provided if CAS so directs.
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:16 am
by kickinit » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:55 am
Jim05 wrote:Thats all well and good kickinit but how can WADA impose anything if Andy D thumbs his nose at them?
The AFL is not funded by WADA and WADA cant stop the league from operating.
There are plenty of other sports out there that are not controlled by WADA.
I think ultimately it will be ASADA that punish us and I feel we may end up copping a decent whack.
Put it this way im far less optimistic than I was a week or so ago
by LaughingKookaburra » Fri Jul 05, 2013 9:09 am
by kickinit » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:15 am
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:41 am
kickinit wrote:The afl cant approve any substance for use only asada can. Essendon is trying to claim dank had the approval from wada. Wada said it wasn't a s2 banned substance but he needed to check with asada if it was a s0 banned substance
by Footy Smart » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:13 pm
by tigerpie » Fri Jul 05, 2013 2:17 pm
by kickinit » Fri Jul 05, 2013 6:38 pm
Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:The afl cant approve any substance for use only asada can. Essendon is trying to claim dank had the approval from wada. Wada said it wasn't a s2 banned substance but he needed to check with asada if it was a s0 banned substance
Your knowledge is better than mire on this stuff kickinit but I recall seeing an article where it states s0 is banned unless it is made and prescribed by a compounding pharmacist. Could this be a loophole the club is trying to use?
Any pharmacological substance which is not addressed by any of the subsequent sections of the List and with no current approval by any governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use (e.g drugs under pre-clinical or clinical development or discontinued, designer drugs, substances approved only for veterinary use) is prohibited.
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:04 am
by Turbo » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:42 am
Jim05 wrote:Caro had her rant on Footy Classified tonight
She Believes Hird will cop a 3-6 month suspension
Essendon will lose all points for 2013
Will also lose draft picks
A number of staff including Bomber to be moved on
She is usually close to the mark thanks to her moles on the AFL board
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:12 am
Turbo wrote:Jim05 wrote:Caro had her rant on Footy Classified tonight
She Believes Hird will cop a 3-6 month suspension
Essendon will lose all points for 2013
Will also lose draft picks
A number of staff including Bomber to be moved on
She is usually close to the mark thanks to her moles on the AFL board
She made it sound that it was Hird who was the leader of this all and Dank provided the service. Reckon some players will be banned too. This'll set essendon back years
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |