Round 15 - The run home is underway

[Booney]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

[mots02]

so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

I think the comments about blatant cheating by the umpires and the inability to get a score review right cover that off.

#dogs16

29-14 free kicks in favour of the bombers. Funnily enough, very similar free kick ratio to the 2016 gf. Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Gotta feel for those poor NSW teams

[DOC]

so the bombers get a win due to dodgy circumstances. I look forward everyone on here ripping into bombers supporters about this.

I think the comments about blatant cheating by the umpires and the inability to get a score review right cover that off.

#dogs16

29-14 free kicks in favour of the bombers. Funnily enough, very similar free kick ratio to the 2016 gf. Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

WTF? You are South Melbourne!

[woodublieve12]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

Or when you get banned from trading for following the rules.... oh, hang on....

Or when cola was never an issue when we weren’t winning.... oh, hang on...

Or when people bitch and moan about umpires costing the bombers a game of footy but zero mention when it’s the other way around.... oh, hang on...

Or when you don’t have cola anymore and people still complain.... oh, hang on...

Or when people complaint about swans crowd and membership numbers but we get bigger crowds then them... oh, hang on...


#ohhangon

[Lightning McQueen]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

Or when you get banned from trading for following the rules.... oh, hang on....

Or when cola was never an issue when we weren’t winning.... oh, hang on...

Or when people bitch and moan about umpires costing the bombers a game of footy but zero mention when it’s the other way around.... oh, hang on...

Or when you don’t have cola anymore and people still complain.... oh, hang on...

Or when people complaint about swans crowd and membership numbers but we get bigger crowds then them... oh, hang on...


#ohhangon

than*

[nuggety goodness]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...
[emoji38]

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

Or when you get banned from trading for following the rules.... oh, hang on....

Or when cola was never an issue when we weren’t winning.... oh, hang on...

Or when people bitch and moan about umpires costing the bombers a game of footy but zero mention when it’s the other way around.... oh, hang on...

Or when you don’t have cola anymore and people still complain.... oh, hang on...

Or when people complaint about swans crowd and membership numbers but we get bigger crowds then them... oh, hang on...


#ohhangon

Or when you..... ummm.... or when you.... ohhhh...

[emoji848]

Who cares!!!!!!!!!!! Such a whingefest in here!


#2016premiers #dicknyourass

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

[JK]

The mark to the GWS big fella on the wing and the non HTB against Heppell were glaring mistakes our way.

I can't remember a season when so many overhead marks haven't been paid. From memory there was one earlier this season not paid to one of your blokes (Guelphi I think).

[mots02]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

Or when you get banned from trading for following the rules.... oh, hang on....

Or when cola was never an issue when we weren’t winning.... oh, hang on...

Or when people bitch and moan about umpires costing the bombers a game of footy but zero mention when it’s the other way around.... oh, hang on...

Or when you don’t have cola anymore and people still complain.... oh, hang on...

Or when people complaint about swans crowd and membership numbers but we get bigger crowds then them... oh, hang on...


#ohhangon

[Armchair expert]

You want the net or the gaff Booney

[Booney]

You want the net or the gaff Booney

Gaff and winch, please.

[Rik E Boy]

Vic bias. Another example of nsw teams being robbed.

Except when Rampe climbed & shook the post which should’ve been a 50m penalty to Essendon which would have won them the game or except when Goldstein was blatantly held in a ruck contest in the forward pocket which should’ve been paid & would’ve resulted in North goal & win - but hey, it’s “Vic bias”...

Or when Sydney were given an extra $600,000-$700,000 per year to pay their players because rent in Sydney is more than....oh, hang on.....

Or when you get banned from trading for following the rules.... oh, hang on....

Or when cola was never an issue when we weren’t winning.... oh, hang on...

Or when people bitch and moan about umpires costing the bombers a game of footy but zero mention when it’s the other way around.... oh, hang on...

Or when you don’t have cola anymore and people still complain.... oh, hang on...

Or when people complaint about swans crowd and membership numbers but we get bigger crowds then them... oh, hang on...


#ohhangon

**** me get waaaaambulance out.

regards,

REB

[Lightning McQueen]

**** me get waaaaambulance out.

regards,

REB

[woodublieve12]

**** me get waaaaambulance out.

regards,

REB

[PatowalongaPirate]

My Friday Forecast -

* Dangerfield fakes an injury
* Crouch boys combine for 75 touches
* MT79 full of homebrew before halftime
* Ablett kicks 4
* Cats by 29pts
* Attendance 32,655

[Lightning McQueen]

My Friday Forecast -

* Dangerfield fakes an injury
* Crouch boys combine for 75 touches
* MT79 full of homebrew before halftime
* Ablett kicks 4
* Cats by 29pts
* Attendance 32,655

SGM: Geelong (20-39)/ under 156.5/ Danger 30+ disp/ Danger anytime goal scorer/ Greenwood anytime goal scorer $5 @ 55's= $275 return.

Don't just pick a winner, back em on Sportsbet.

[daysofourlives]

My Friday Forecast -

* Dangerfield fakes an injury
* Crouch boys combine for 75 touches
* MT79 full of homebrew before halftime
* Ablett kicks 4
* Cats by 29pts
* Attendance 32,655

SGM: Geelong (20-39)/ under 156.5/ Danger 30+ disp/ Danger anytime goal scorer/ Greenwood anytime goal scorer $5 @ 55's= $275 return.

Don't just pick a winner, back em on Sportsbet.

Anyone know why when I do a 9 leg same game multi and I add Geelong 1-19 @$4 it makes it 271/1 but if I then remove that and go Geelong 41-60 @$4.50 the odds are only 141/1?
I wonder if it has to do with going over 156.5 total points as part of the multi or that I have 3 geelong plahyers as any time goal scorers, if they win by heaps they are more likely to kick a goal meaning worse odds?

Its weird as, my other 8 legs are 39/1

[Brodlach]

Would have thought the 1-19 multi would be $156

[Spargo]

Draw tonight - $10 @ $71

[daysofourlives]

Would have thought the 1-19 multi would be $156

Exactly, ive noticed this quite a lot with SGM. It more often happens the other way where the odds are less than they should be

[Armchair expert]

Betts got a kick, must be junk time already

Crows by 10 goals