SA Footy

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:Why is Morris a flog?

He may have been caught masturbating?

You get used to it after the first few times, it's always more embarrassing for the catcher

Lightning McQueen wrote:Feel free to pm me the details please..........anyone?

Nothing you don't hear a dozen times a day in a workshop environment, obviously he has a shit mate or a mate who doesn't actually like him, which is no real surprise, was probably that McClure stooge.

Armchair expert wrote:Richmond by 15 goals

will be a slaughter

Good call this one.

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Mitch McGovern is dead set weak as piss. Going up with 1 hand whilst in front at AFL level is embarrassing especially in defence whilst under pressure.

If I were MG, I’d rather being plying his ‘weak as piss!’ Trade at Carlton rather than Adelaide.

With all due respect, i reckon this one might bite you in the you know where.

Spargo wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Wow, didn't Richmond fall away from mid way through the third. Carltòn mids dominate from that point. A lot of Tiger supporters were expecting a big bounce back, but I can't see that happening.

It’s only round 1.

Yeah it is, but if you think Richmond were just off. Pffft, no chance and Carlton also didn’t have their best player and smacked ‘em.

Refer my ladder.

You’ve all said Richmond are big improvers based on what? Happy to listen.

What really staggers me is most on here I think are keyboard warriors that never played the game and I’ll never give the time of day, but the guys calling the Richmond improvement I actually rate there opinion, they get the game. Go figure.

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Wow, didn't Richmond fall away from mid way through the third. Carltòn mids dominate from that point. A lot of Tiger supporters were expecting a big bounce back, but I can't see that happening.

Yeah Richmond ‘Fell away’ nothing to do with Carlton playing well hey?

I’ll say again, where is this Richmond big improvement? Based on what?

Armchair expert wrote:Richmond by 15 goals

will be a slaughter

Death, Taxes and Armchairs tips!

carey wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Wow, didn't Richmond fall away from mid way through the third. Carltòn mids dominate from that point. A lot of Tiger supporters were expecting a big bounce back, but I can't see that happening.

Yeah Richmond ‘Fell away’ nothing to do with Carlton playing well hey?

I’ll say again, where is this Richmond big improvement? Based on what?

I think people base it on Dusty being back.

I am with you though, cant see them making the 8.

carey wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Wow, didn't Richmond fall away from mid way through the third. Carltòn mids dominate from that point. A lot of Tiger supporters were expecting a big bounce back, but I can't see that happening.

Yeah Richmond ‘Fell away’ nothing to do with Carlton playing well hey?

I’ll say again, where is this Richmond big improvement? Based on what?

I got sucked in by the media hype, I actually thought they look weaker on paper than last year but still fell for it, the dynasty is over as good as it was.

carey wrote:What really staggers me is most on here I think are keyboard warriors that never played the game and I’ll never give the time of day, but the guys calling the Richmond improvement I actually rate there opinion, they get the game. Go figure.

Studley, is that you?

Vamos wrote:#premiershipfavourites

Yeah baby!!

Carey 4am posts, great to have footy back

Vamos wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Feel free to pm me the details please..........anyone?

Nothing you don't hear a dozen times a day in a workshop environment.

"Put it away, the boss is coming"?

carey wrote:

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Wow, didn't Richmond fall away from mid way through the third. Carltòn mids dominate from that point. A lot of Tiger supporters were expecting a big bounce back, but I can't see that happening.

Yeah Richmond ‘Fell away’ nothing to do with Carlton playing well hey?

I’ll say again, where is this Richmond big improvement? Based on what?

I would say it's come from last year being so hit with injuries. We had that many first 18 players miss huge chunks of time last year most people thought with a full squad back together they could rise for one last challenge.

I think if everything went 100% right we could give the flag one last shake this year and I'm glad they have gone all in. My main concern is our mids, just can't see it sticking up against the top younger teams like Melb, WB etc for pace which showed last night. Prestia is out best mid but his body keeps letting him down, we were on top last night till he went down. Dusty needs to apply some defenisve pressure at times too.

If we get to the middle of the year & finals look a while off, we will fall away quickly again like last year & some retirements of our stars may begin with Cotch & perhaps Jack.

I also think the new stand rule on the mark bought in last year hasn't suited us & allowed teams to get the ball in quicker before our defence sets up, like it did from 2017-2020 .

Hoping the lads can give it that one last shake.

Lightning McQueen wrote:Feel free to pm me the details please..........anyone?

the two recordings appear in the first post here:
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ ... o.1303307/

(sorry if links to BF are banned?)

For mine the first one isn't bad at all, basically said she's hot and he's disappointed he can't have a crack cause she prefers girls to boys.

The second one, yeah, I can see why that's not acceptable.

Trader wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Feel free to pm me the details please..........anyone?

the two recordings appear in the first post here:
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ ... o.1303307/

(sorry if links to BF are banned?)

For mine the first one isn't bad at all, basically said she's hot and he's disappointed he can't have a crack cause she prefers girls to boys.

The second one, yeah, I can see why that's not acceptable.

the first one isn't good at many levels either but most significantly for Tom in this instance, she's a work colleague not some random walking down the street. Speaking about randoms like that, I can see how some will say 'thats not too bad'... speaking about a work colleague like that, he's in a world of pain and rightly so. Its just disappointing that she's also dragged into it without knowledge.

Trader wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Feel free to pm me the details please..........anyone?

the two recordings appear in the first post here:
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ ... o.1303307/

(sorry if links to BF are banned?)

For mine the first one isn't bad at all, basically said she's hot and he's disappointed he can't have a crack cause she prefers girls to boys.

The second one, yeah, I can see why that's not acceptable.

Yeah, just sounds like a pissed unit talking crap

mots02 wrote:
the first one isn't good at many levels either but most significantly for Tom in this instance, she's a work colleague not some random walking down the street. Speaking about randoms like that, I can see how some will say 'thats not too bad'... speaking about a work colleague like that, he's in a world of pain and rightly so. Its just disappointing that she's also dragged into it without knowledge.

Could up being a Tom sandwich.

Morris sacked from Fox Footy.

The Age and other new agencies reporting it.

Is it just me or is Tim Morris a dead ringer for ex Collingwood captain Nick Maxwell