SA Footy

carey wrote:Really wish we brought in Mason Shaw.

This kid is screaming out for an opportunity.

Bloody oath carey, Butchers had tooo many chances, this ( Shaw ) kid deserves atleast 1 chance doesn't he?

After Fremantles loss, Port can climb back into the top 4

I'm fired up for today's game. Big win for Dom and back in the Top 4.

Port by 47 points, 14 goals to 7

Port by plenty, Wingard return to form with 3+ goals

Port to win 63-21.

regards,

REB

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Port by plenty, Wingard return to form with 3+ goals

He may struggle, dees like contested footy, wingard doesn't

woodublieve12 wrote:

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Port by plenty, Wingard return to form with 3+ goals

He may struggle, dees like contested footy, wingard doesn't

I disagree with that completely. He is in a form slump so that's how it looks at the moment. When he gets it back he is like a ferret and throws himself in there. Last four weeks he has been good at either. When he's hot he is very dangerous one on one

Hopefully when he tears the Sydney Colas a new one on GF day you will duly apologise

woodublieve12 wrote:

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Port by plenty, Wingard return to form with 3+ goals

He may struggle, dees like contested footy, wingard doesn't

That's because his not a midfielder! Leave him as the small forward especially with Gus out. I think people underestimate the hole Gus leaves.

Wingard was killing it when the midfield was on top and he can be a stay at home small forward.

Port win

96-42

Broadbent best on, The Hoff 4 sausage rolls

Carey- 32 cans, 3 hotdogs, a pie, a ripped shirt, kicked out the Audi room banned for3 months and best off ground honours

carey wrote:Port win

96-42

Broadbent best on, The Hoff 4 sausage rolls

Carey- 32 cans, 3 hotdogs, a pie, a ripped shirt, kicked out the Audi room banned for3 months and best off ground honours

Standard day at the footy.

carey wrote:That's because his not a midfielder! Leave him as the small forward especially with Gus out. I think people underestimate the hole Gus leaves.

Wingard was killing it when the midfield was on top and he can be a stay at home small forward.

Agreed. I think though he is not far away from exploding and ripping a game apart again, and although Butcher is an average player, think he will benefit from having the extra tall forward he can crumb.

Today's the day..

port y 8 points

I'm just Wondering what the Port folk ( and any others ) thought it would take for you to trade Johnny Butcher. I was listening to Tredrea yesterday say that it would take a first and second round pick for Port to let him go...

I nearly crashed the car into a tree due to not being able to see for the tears of laughter...

I would think a 2nd round pick would be more than enough...

Thoughts???

Jase wrote:I'm just Wondering what the Port folk ( and any others ) thought it would take for you to trade Johnny Butcher. I was listening to Tredrea yesterday say that it would take a first and second round pick for Port to let him go...

I nearly crashed the car into a tree due to not being able to see for the tears of laughter...

I would think a 2nd round pick would be more than enough...

Thoughts???

He'll be delisted and if anyone wants him they will get him for nothing

daysofourlives wrote:

Jase wrote:I'm just Wondering what the Port folk ( and any others ) thought it would take for you to trade Johnny Butcher. I was listening to Tredrea yesterday say that it would take a first and second round pick for Port to let him go...

I nearly crashed the car into a tree due to not being able to see for the tears of laughter...

I would think a 2nd round pick would be more than enough...

Thoughts???

He'll be delisted and if anyone wants him they will get him for nothing

There wouldnt be a SANFL club who would take him let alone a AFL side

wouldn't even be able to trade him for bottle tops ...

Port win by 3pts

Jase wrote:I'm just Wondering what the Port folk ( and any others ) thought it would take for you to trade Johnny Butcher. I was listening to Tredrea yesterday say that it would take a first and second round pick for Port to let him go...

I nearly crashed the car into a tree due to not being able to see for the tears of laughter...

I would think a 2nd round pick would be more than enough...

Thoughts???

3 beers

carey wrote:

Jase wrote:I'm just Wondering what the Port folk ( and any others ) thought it would take for you to trade Johnny Butcher. I was listening to Tredrea yesterday say that it would take a first and second round pick for Port to let him go...

I nearly crashed the car into a tree due to not being able to see for the tears of laughter...

I would think a 2nd round pick would be more than enough...

Thoughts???

3 beers

And. A lift home would be a bonus

Well, didn’t we steal that one! Not that I’m unhappy with a win, but it again raised a few questions about this playing group.

Melbourne are much improved under Paul Roos and were, in many ways, the first team to dismantle Port back some weeks ago in Alice Springs. Although they didn’t get the chocolates in the Red Centre they did give other sides the blue print for how to beat Port. Keep Broadbent, Hartlett and Polec from running across the half back line unmanned, make the midfield a congested mess with up to 30 players around the ball and when Port do gain possession you make sure your defenders staying off the ball spread across to the “open” side of the ground denying Port the space to run and attack. Other teams have since successfully used a similar formula, Essendon especially.

Another thing Melbourne did well yesterday was push the ball from stoppages to Port’s attacking side. Port like to dish the ball to the defensive side at contests, spread from there with run from behind. That’s when we are playing well. Melbourne used this to their advantage yesterday knowing on their defensive side of the contest they could have room to move then use the ball, they did and they did.

With Trengove and Carlile out Port are relying on Jonas, Hombsch and O’Shea to play as the key talls. While they have a disadvantage in the air, the coaching staff have tried to use the speed on the ground as an advantage.

What we’ve seen for 3 weeks now is Port get the ball in the back half, Harlett, Broadbent and Polec get manned up immediately by anyone in their general area. So Port try to take advantage of this by having Pittard, Hombsch and O’Shea run the ball out of defence. Now this can create a couple of issues.

It can throw the opposition structure out as key forwards chase our key defenders up the ground, but they’ve learnt to stay at home and maintain their structure. Essendon, Richmond and Melbourne all did the same thing. It also means O’Shea and Pittard ( despite their very best efforts ) are running and delivering the ball from defence. I have alot of time for both of these guys and expect them both to have long careers down back, but with all their best intentions they do not possess the foot skills of the other three noted above. So Port’s key backs are now out of position, the oppositions key forwards are “structured up” and a turn over from Port turns into opposition goals.

With Trengove and Carlile offering marking targets on the way out of defence the key forwards have no option but to chase them, their structure breaks down and the likes of Westhoff and Schulz aren’t up on the wing looking for an avenue to goal. Crikey we need those two back.

Again yesterday the man-child Ollie Wines led the way in midfield contests in the first half. He has carried our midfield ( with Boak ) for several weeks. No surprises with the size of his legs, he could carry anything!
Wines is a beast on the ground, strong enough through the core getting tackled to get his arms free and sticks tackles as tackles should be stuck. He would be, IMO, in out top 3 of our B&F at the moment and could conceivably win it if he maintains this form all year.

My top 5 :

Ollie Wines – 26 disposals, 11 contested, 7 clearances, 9 tackles, 5 I50. Another game where this kid stood out as the best contested ball player on the ground. He ripped the ball out of plenty of early contests, held Melbourne up numerous times as they looked to “get out” and was, IMO, the best player on the ground.

Cam O’Shea – 25 disposals, 12 marks, 3 R50. Although he burnt us a couple of times with his foot skills, he also saved us a couple of times late in the game with an important spoil or mark. Been in our best 2 of the last 3 weeks and has cemented his spot in the side. Will be interesting to see who goes out the side with the return of Carlile and Trengove, for mine, O’Shea isn’t one to go.

Robbie Gray – 26 disposals, 16 contested, 8 clearances, 6 tackles, 4 I50. Really has been in outstanding form this year, a certain AA and has his lateral movement back, he sides steps players with ease and is spending more time in the midfield. A genuine star.

Paul Stewart – 8 disposal, 2 goals, 100% disp. Efficiency, 3 tackles. Although he only had the 8 touches, his 2 goals were very important, the flexibility he offers the side as a third marking target and his 3 tackles were all inside Port’s F50, 2 of which resulted in goals. In a close contest that had plenty of errors by foot and hand, 100% efficiency and 2 goals was very, very important.

Aaron Young – 16 disposals, 4 clearances, 4 tackles, 1 goal. He’s been or sub numerous times in recent weeks and this week got his chance to run out a full game. His numbers might not look huge but he did more than enough to not only keep his spot in the line-up but push for regular selection.

Once again though White ( 9 touches and subbed ) , Polec ( 8 touches @ 50% ) and Wingard ( 13 touches, 1 goal ) had quiet days. Wingard got in amongst it early but faded, while White and Polec were soundly beaten. These three have had the spotlight on them for three weeks now and really need to respond.

The week off could not come at a better time.