Page 46 of 116
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 1:34 pm
by gossipgirl
Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
obviously watching footy games in a parallel universe
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 2:06 pm
by Booney
gossipgirl wrote:Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
obviously watching footy games in a parallel universe
Why, you disagree with Betts being a dud or playing better in the second half?
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 2:11 pm
by Rik E Boy
gossipgirl wrote:Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
obviously watching footy games in a parallel universe
Well someone around here is LOL.
regards,
REB
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 2:25 pm
by bennymacca
I think it was more the assertion that the crows just smashed them in the second half. Which wasn't true.
So you could argue that Eddie (along with many other more important players on the night) stepped up in the second half rather than front runnjng
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 4:33 pm
by Stumps
Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
Be interested if you can name a small forward/forward pocket who plays well when the side is struggling. Toughest position on the ground when the team is playing poorly
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Fri May 23, 2014 4:39 pm
by Booney
Rik E Boy wrote:gossipgirl wrote:Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
obviously watching footy games in a parallel universe
Well someone around here is LOL.
regards,
REB
Betts is LOL'ing all the way to the bank....
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 1:16 am
by kickinit
Stumps wrote:Red Rocket wrote:Of course Betts was better in the second half, the Crows were winning easily.
Massive front runner, struggles to get a kick when the game is in the balance
Be interested if you can name a small forward/forward pocket who plays well when the side is struggling. Toughest position on the ground when the team is playing poorly
Chad Wingard, Robbie Gray, Cyril Rioli say hello
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 1:30 am
by bennymacca
well all of them have been in teams that have been flying, so its hardly a fair comparison.
not saying betts is as good as those blokes but put him in hawthorn or port's team and he would do much better.
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 9:05 am
by Booney
bennymacca wrote:well all of them have been in teams that have been flying, so its hardly a fair comparison.
not saying betts is as good as those blokes but put him in hawthorn or port's team and he would do much better.
No he wouldn't. He doesn't work hard enough.
Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 11:27 am
by bennymacca
I agree with that part, have said so myself on here.
But Harvey, Johnson, giansiracusa and ablett are the only small people currently playing the game to have kicked more goals in their career than betts. It's not a bad record at all.
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 12:32 pm
by JK
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:well all of them have been in teams that have been flying, so its hardly a fair comparison.
not saying betts is as good as those blokes but put him in hawthorn or port's team and he would do much better.
No he wouldn't. He doesn't work hard enough.
Either he would work harder under KH or he would be gone .. Maybe that highlights some philosophical differences between the clubs
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 6:52 pm
by Stumps
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:well all of them have been in teams that have been flying, so its hardly a fair comparison.
not saying betts is as good as those blokes but put him in hawthorn or port's team and he would do much better.
No he wouldn't. He doesn't work hard enough.
Worst call of all time . Works hard but in a developing forward structure
Deadset pot shot for a good small forward. Not an absolute gun. Wingard appears a better player but you don't get 300+ goals as a small fwd if u don't work hard
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 7:31 pm
by carey
Game and season over.
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 7:43 pm
by carey
1st option Sloane and you win, cost your mob the season
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 pm
by daysofourlives
mmmm perspective
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Sun May 25, 2014 9:52 pm
by Ruben Carter
To everyone who thinks Sanderson is an average coach, spot on - I'd go further & say when Dean Bailey died, so too did any coaching credibility in their panel.
They not only have a very average coaching panel, but I think a pretty average list as well.
Good luck next week against Gold Coast - you'll need it...
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2014 9:23 am
by Booney
Stumps wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:well all of them have been in teams that have been flying, so its hardly a fair comparison.
not saying betts is as good as those blokes but put him in hawthorn or port's team and he would do much better.
No he wouldn't. He doesn't work hard enough.
Worst call of all time . Works hard but in a developing forward structure
Deadset pot shot for a good small forward. Not an absolute gun. Wingard appears a better player but you don't get 300+ goals as a small fwd if u don't work hard
Maybe if he'd worked as hard as some others he'd have 500 goals?
I have trouble singing the praises of anyone who wont put their head over the ball.
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2014 9:42 am
by Stumps
Go into the port thread. You have enough going well for your club without having to bring others done
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2014 9:57 am
by woodublieve12
Serious question... Not stirring sh*t...
I know walker is only 2 games in but has been very average.
Does he deserve the hype he gets?
Re: Crows 2014
Posted:
Mon May 26, 2014 10:00 am
by carey
woodublieve12 wrote:Serious question... Not stirring sh*t...
I know walker is only 2 games in but has been very average.
Does he deserve the hype he gets?
No.