Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:43 pmMW wrote:Dutchy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Giles has nominated Essendon.
Geez Adelaide must stink is guys are picking Essendon over them
If I had the option to battle Bellchambers for 1st ruck and prob. play most games as 2nd ruck OR battle Jacobs for 1st ruck or Jenkins for 2nd ruck/forward role, gee I wonder which one I would pick...
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:54 pmDutchy wrote:CONFIRMED:
Eddie McGuire has confirmed that Collingwood, Brisbane, North Melbourne, Melbourne and Geelong will lodge paperwork “this afternoon” that will see a monster five-club trade finalised.
Here is a brief overview of what each club will part with and welcome.
COLLINGWOOD
IN: Pick 5, 25 (which will be on-traded to North Melbourne), Jack Crisp, Travis Varcoe, Levi Greenwood
OUT: Dayne Beams, Heritier Lumumba, Pick 25
BRISBANE:
IN: Dayne Beams
OUT: Picks 5, 25, Jack Crisp
NORTH MELBOURNE:
IN: Pick 25
OUT: Levi Greenwood
MELBOURNE:
IN: Heritier Lumumba
OUT: Mitch Clark
GEELONG:
IN: Mitch Clark
OUT: Travis Varcoe
Subject to change (draft pick).
Who wins this monstrosity of a trade?
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:09 pmDutchy wrote:Who wins this monstrosity of a trade?
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:19 pmQ. wrote:Dutchy wrote:Who wins this monstrosity of a trade?
Brisbane by the length of the Flemington straight.
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:21 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:23 pmHH3 wrote:MatteeG wrote:"Huge coup for Port Adelaide as Michael Voss commits as 'midfield manager'. Voss replaces recently appointed Adelaide coach Phil Walsh."
Wonder if that has anything to do with the contacts during "The Recruit"?
Didnt Polec want to leave Brisbane partly because of Voss?
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:26 pmBooney wrote:Q. wrote:Dutchy wrote:Who wins this monstrosity of a trade?
Brisbane by the length of the Flemington straight.
Brisbane winners, North the losers.
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:41 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:43 pmbennymacca wrote:reckon the beams deal is about fair.
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:44 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:53 pmBooney wrote:Can't believe North let Greenwood go so easily. 25 seems way unders for an established inside, goal kicking mid.
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:58 pmDutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Can't believe North let Greenwood go so easily. 25 seems way unders for an established inside, goal kicking mid.
Got rid of a player we don't need and secure a good pick in the draft where we are already a fair way back.
Very smart decision IMO, why sign a guy for 4 years when he has played 1 good one in 6?
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:03 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:07 pmMW wrote:Dutchy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Giles has nominated Essendon.
Geez Adelaide must stink is guys are picking Essendon over them
If I had the option to battle Bellchambers for 1st ruck and prob. play most games as 2nd ruck OR battle Jacobs for 1st ruck or Jenkins for 2nd ruck/forward role, gee I wonder which one I would pick...
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:10 pmHH3 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Can't believe North let Greenwood go so easily. 25 seems way unders for an established inside, goal kicking mid.
Got rid of a player we don't need and secure a good pick in the draft where we are already a fair way back.
Very smart decision IMO, why sign a guy for 4 years when he has played 1 good one in 6?
Don't bother trying to tell them anything factual about Greenwood mate. They've probably seen 3 North games this year and are experts on him.
I tried to tell them he's had the one good year after playing 11 games in the prior two years combined....they don't wanna listen.
Should be up there in the Brownlow next season.
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:12 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:13 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:16 pm
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:31 pmPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:32 pm