Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

Your thoughts.
I think they havent got "Buckleys"

I think they havent got "Buckleys"


NO-MERCY wrote:Only one team has sustained the intensity & pressure required for 4 qtrs against the Crows & that was Hawthorn, the result was an easy win to the Hawks.
Adelaide have been lucky to date catching opposition sides out with injuries to key players, don't get me wrong The Crows are playing very good footy & if the Magpies are to extend their winning streak here at Footy Park they must apply the pressure needed for 4 qtrs.
Dangerfield & Thompson are the engine room & the keys to Adelaide so i think cutting these 2 out of the game is vital, if they can restrict these 2 to under 15 posessions each it'll go along way to notching up 7 in a row at Footy Pk.
C'mon you Pies!!!
howzat wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Only one team has sustained the intensity & pressure required for 4 qtrs against the Crows & that was Hawthorn, the result was an easy win to the Hawks.
Adelaide have been lucky to date catching opposition sides out with injuries to key players, don't get me wrong The Crows are playing very good footy & if the Magpies are to extend their winning streak here at Footy Park they must apply the pressure needed for 4 qtrs.
Dangerfield & Thompson are the engine room & the keys to Adelaide so i think cutting these 2 out of the game is vital, if they can restrict these 2 to under 15 posessions each it'll go along way to notching up 7 in a row at Footy Pk.
C'mon you Pies!!!
bloody hell m8 you wrote the script
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
JK wrote:Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
Yeah it was pretty reckless, reckon he might be in strife .. Went to spoil a handball receive (IIRC) but collected his opponent high which produced some claret.
Collingwood fans would have to be pretty happy about Didaks form in recent in weeks? I wasn't sure he would make it back, but whilst he'll never likely be as dynamic as he once was, I reckon he's shown he can still be pretty useful for the Pies.
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug
Jim05 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug
Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?
Jim05 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug
Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?
Jim05 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?
at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug
Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?