Page 1 of 3

Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:27 pm
by Dog_ger
Your thoughts.

I think they havent got "Buckleys" :D :D

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 8:54 am
by stan
It is all setup for a crows win and a good win at that. Swan and Reid out. Plenty of the pies under done, the crows should win easily.

Dangerfield will probably get tagged tonight so expect Thompson or Sloane to kill it.

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 1:22 pm
by NO-MERCY
Only one team has sustained the intensity & pressure required for 4 qtrs against the Crows & that was Hawthorn, the result was an easy win to the Hawks.
Adelaide have been lucky to date catching opposition sides out with injuries to key players, don't get me wrong The Crows are playing very good footy & if the Magpies are to extend their winning streak here at Footy Park they must apply the pressure needed for 4 qtrs.
Dangerfield & Thompson are the engine room & the keys to Adelaide so i think cutting these 2 out of the game is vital, if they can restrict these 2 to under 15 posessions each it'll go along way to notching up 7 in a row at Footy Pk.

C'mon you Pies!!!

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:01 pm
by leonidis
under 15 possesions?
Is someone going to king hit them prior to half time?

:roll: :roll:

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 10:53 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Go the Pies. :lol:

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 10:59 pm
by howzat
NO-MERCY wrote:Only one team has sustained the intensity & pressure required for 4 qtrs against the Crows & that was Hawthorn, the result was an easy win to the Hawks.
Adelaide have been lucky to date catching opposition sides out with injuries to key players, don't get me wrong The Crows are playing very good footy & if the Magpies are to extend their winning streak here at Footy Park they must apply the pressure needed for 4 qtrs.
Dangerfield & Thompson are the engine room & the keys to Adelaide so i think cutting these 2 out of the game is vital, if they can restrict these 2 to under 15 posessions each it'll go along way to notching up 7 in a row at Footy Pk.

C'mon you Pies!!!


bloody hell m8 you wrote the script :lol:

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:05 am
by Jimmy_041
Go Pies

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:37 am
by Mr66
44,000?
What's the capacity for Footy Park these days?

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:04 am
by NO-MERCY
howzat wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:Only one team has sustained the intensity & pressure required for 4 qtrs against the Crows & that was Hawthorn, the result was an easy win to the Hawks.
Adelaide have been lucky to date catching opposition sides out with injuries to key players, don't get me wrong The Crows are playing very good footy & if the Magpies are to extend their winning streak here at Footy Park they must apply the pressure needed for 4 qtrs.
Dangerfield & Thompson are the engine room & the keys to Adelaide so i think cutting these 2 out of the game is vital, if they can restrict these 2 to under 15 posessions each it'll go along way to notching up 7 in a row at Footy Pk.

C'mon you Pies!!!


bloody hell m8 you wrote the script :lol:



Giddy up you PIES!!!

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:18 pm
by Dogwatcher
Yeah, boyyyyyyy!

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:25 pm
by Jim05
Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:26 pm
by Dogwatcher
Typical Crow thugs :lol:

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:28 pm
by JK
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


Yeah it was pretty reckless, reckon he might be in strife .. Went to spoil a handball receive (IIRC) but collected his opponent high which produced some claret.

Collingwood fans would have to be pretty happy about Didaks form in recent in weeks? I wasn't sure he would make it back, but whilst he'll never likely be as dynamic as he once was, I reckon he's shown he can still be pretty useful for the Pies.

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:43 pm
by am Bays
JK wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


Yeah it was pretty reckless, reckon he might be in strife .. Went to spoil a handball receive (IIRC) but collected his opponent high which produced some claret.

Collingwood fans would have to be pretty happy about Didaks form in recent in weeks? I wasn't sure he would make it back, but whilst he'll never likely be as dynamic as he once was, I reckon he's shown he can still be pretty useful for the Pies.


Deserves a week on the basis of stupidity...

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:37 pm
by tigerpie
Great to see Dids back. Looks to have lost a little speed but his skills and hard running were a joy to watch.
Keefe bloody unlucky, and now we really need Tarrant back!!!!

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:16 pm
by Jimmy_041
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug ;)

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:21 pm
by Jim05
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug ;)

Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:32 pm
by JK
Jim05 wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug ;)

Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?


2 weeks, maybe 1 with a plea (as a guess)

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:32 pm
by Mad Mat
Jim05 wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug ;)

Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?


Blair was bleeding like a stuck pig, didn't see the incident though.

Damn you Collingwood :evil: In hindsight it was no surprise really. I've got nothing but admiration for the Pies, they sub Fasalo off, Keefe goes down two minutes later, they're left with two on the bench and there's a point the difference. Who wins from here? Pies grow another leg, Crows look out on their legs, game over.

Re: Crows v Collingwood 26/05/2012

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:59 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Jim05 wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Heard on the radio that Vince may be cited for a high shot, did anyone see the incident?
Just an accident or a deliberate whack?


at least 4 weeks - he's a pretty boy thug ;)

Still havnt seen it, was it that bad or you taking the piss Jimmy?


Very average