CoverKing wrote:Sam Lonergan. Should know your own players surely?
bahahahahahaha
ill deter the attention of that one to this:
by cossi11 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:49 am
CoverKing wrote:Sam Lonergan. Should know your own players surely?
by CoverKing » Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:55 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:19 pm
by JK » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:33 pm
by Booney » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:34 pm
JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
by cossi11 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:35 pm
JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
by Booney » Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:36 pm
PatowalongaPirate wrote:I think the product may be SARMs.
by daysofourlives » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:56 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:58 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:59 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
by heater31 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:00 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:03 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:05 pm
Booney wrote:JK wrote:Not that I think it would happen, but if Jobe was stripped of his Brownlow would the betting agencies have to payout on Cotchin/Mitchell (and Thompson/Swan as placegetters)?
I would doubt the first and think the second part simply wouldn't happen.
Bookies are bookies, you know?
by Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:06 pm
heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
by daysofourlives » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:07 pm
heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
by Banker » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:09 pm
Last year, says ASADA's register, three Queensland amateur rugby players were caught in possession of, using and/or trafficking peptide, and suspended for two to four years.
ASADA makes no allowance for the unsuspecting. ''Athletes are responsible for any substance found in their body,'' said an addendum to a release last year. ''There have been cases where … athletes have been sanctioned after they have used supplements that they thought were OK, but which were actually contaminated with prohibited substances.'
by heater31 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:10 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
Essendon have a reserves team in the VFL? They should be forced to use those players even though they may not be up to AFL standard.
They dont have enough listed players to take out 25 and promote the rest to the senior side
by heater31 » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:11 pm
Banker wrote:Last year, says ASADA's register, three Queensland amateur rugby players were caught in possession of, using and/or trafficking peptide, and suspended for two to four years.
ASADA makes no allowance for the unsuspecting. ''Athletes are responsible for any substance found in their body,'' said an addendum to a release last year. ''There have been cases where … athletes have been sanctioned after they have used supplements that they thought were OK, but which were actually contaminated with prohibited substances.'
by kickinit » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:12 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Lets say 25 players are suspended by WADA for 2 years which is a likely outcome if proven guilty and that TV rights demand 9 matches.
These 2 things are set in stone.
Would this then mean that the AFL would have to let Essendon draft up to 25 players to fill its list for the coming season?
How would this go with guys that are contratced to SANFL clubs etc?
If they dont do this what happens to the other 15 or so guys on their list? Do they allow each other club one draft pick from this pool and fold Essendon up
by Footy Smart » Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:14 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |