by Mr66 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:37 pm
by HH3 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:45 pm
by woodublieve12 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:46 pm
Mr66 wrote:http://m.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/lance-franklin-to-meet-hawthorn-today-to-tell-the-club-hes-leaving/story-e6frf3e3-1226730762232
Who saw this coming?
by Booney » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:48 pm
by gadj1976 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:48 pm
by woodublieve12 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:50 pm
Booney wrote:Laughable, isn't it?
"We've had a few blokes leave this year..."......you'll have a few more leave quick smart now that they know two mercenaries are taking most of the cash between them.
by HH3 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:51 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:53 pm
by MatteeG » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:54 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:Laughable, isn't it?
"We've had a few blokes leave this year..."......you'll have a few more leave quick smart now that they know two mercenaries are taking most of the cash between them.
i find that very unlikely
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Dissident » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:55 pm
by Johno6 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:56 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:57 pm
by hawks21 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:58 pm
HH3 wrote:It would be interesting to see a breakdown of Sydneys salary cap in comparison with other clubs. Obviously the extra cash isnt being used as intended.
by HH3 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:58 pm
by hawks21 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:58 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:You know, when I saw COLA attached to Buddy's name, I thought people might have been making a drug reference...
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:04 pm
by MatteeG » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:05 pm
Jim05 wrote:Disgraceful, hopefully the clubs all band together and get rid of this ridiculous COLA.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Johno6 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:09 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Dissident wrote:COLA should be per player. And not a percentage, an amount.
If you earn $250k a year, or you earn $1M a year, the COL is the same. Should be the same. At WORST it should be 10% per player. Even then, it's off.
You choose to go there (for the money), you wear the costs. The money outside would be massive too.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:12 pm
HH3 wrote:Its pretty unbelievable isn't it. Good on Sydney for working with what they have though. They obviously have some good business people there.
I still think the only extra cash should go to players earning under $100k a year, and the extra "living allowance" should be paid straight from the AFL to the player. Sydneys list management team should not have the means to manipulate the distribution to construct massive contracts for marquee players.
Surely someone at AFL House will be looking into this for the future.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |