SA Footy

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Jim05 wrote:I think it was only last year that Gil said Buddy’s wage would be on the Swans books for the rest of his contract. Similar to Tippett who retired early.
I wouldn’t be surprised though if Buddy played out his contract albeit with only 10-12 games a season

He'd be stupid not to, loyalty never seemed to be big on his agenda.

he spent 9 years at the hawks and will finish his career at a club he will spend another 9 playing at.

Pretty loyal. It's not like he is like LeBron James and plays at 5 different clubs

woodublieve12 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Jim05 wrote:I think it was only last year that Gil said Buddy’s wage would be on the Swans books for the rest of his contract. Similar to Tippett who retired early.
I wouldn’t be surprised though if Buddy played out his contract albeit with only 10-12 games a season

He'd be stupid not to, loyalty never seemed to be big on his agenda.

he spent 9 years at the hawks and will finish his career at a club he will spend another 9 playing at.

Pretty loyal. It's not like he is like LeBron James and plays at 5 different clubs

He left the best club going around to "apparently" help a new club, backflipped on that to chase the highest paid, longest contract in history, I see your point. I'd be pretty loyal too getting over $1M per year and not training.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Jim05 wrote:I think it was only last year that Gil said Buddy’s wage would be on the Swans books for the rest of his contract. Similar to Tippett who retired early.
I wouldn’t be surprised though if Buddy played out his contract albeit with only 10-12 games a season

He'd be stupid not to, loyalty never seemed to be big on his agenda.

he spent 9 years at the hawks and will finish his career at a club he will spend another 9 playing at.

Pretty loyal. It's not like he is like LeBron James and plays at 5 different clubs

He left the best club going around to "apparently" help a new club, backflipped on that to chase the highest paid, longest contract in history, I see your point. I'd be pretty loyal too getting over $1M per year and not training.

That's what the AFL wanted him to do....

Hard to argue he didn't deserve to be the highest paid player in the AFL...

And when people see it's a business now and not like "the good old days" the better....

woodublieve12 wrote:https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/08/21/they-still-want-him-sydney-to-be-major-players-in-the-trade-period/?fbclid=IwAR0HkFlq3k22DXDCOD1EsaPxoqUztLtLs_wNB5dx1WrIFKoD17L1KuEAb_M

Pony up

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/08/21/they-still-want-him-sydney-to-be-major-players-in-the-trade-period/?fbclid=IwAR0HkFlq3k22DXDCOD1EsaPxoqUztLtLs_wNB5dx1WrIFKoD17L1KuEAb_M

Pony up

2nd round pick or a very late first round draft pick.

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/08/21/they-still-want-him-sydney-to-be-major-players-in-the-trade-period/?fbclid=IwAR0HkFlq3k22DXDCOD1EsaPxoqUztLtLs_wNB5dx1WrIFKoD17L1KuEAb_M

Pony up

2nd round pick or a very late first round draft pick.

Lol
Your first rounder would be the absolute minimum.

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/08/21/they-still-want-him-sydney-to-be-major-players-in-the-trade-period/?fbclid=IwAR0HkFlq3k22DXDCOD1EsaPxoqUztLtLs_wNB5dx1WrIFKoD17L1KuEAb_M

Pony up

2nd round pick or a very late first round draft pick.

Lol
Your first rounder would be the absolute minimum.

you mean for a bloke who has had a year off injured and hasn't done a great deal for 18 months???

If he's not that good why do you want him lol?

Under contract for next year too which makes any price higher.

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Jim05 wrote:[quote="woodublieve12"]https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/08/21/they-still-want-him-sydney-to-be-major-players-in-the-trade-period/?fbclid=IwAR0HkFlq3k22DXDCOD1EsaPxoqUztLtLs_wNB5dx1WrIFKoD17L1KuEAb_M

Pony up

2nd round pick or a very late first round draft pick.

Lol
Your first rounder would be the absolute minimum.

you mean for a bloke who has had a year off injured and hasn't done a great deal for 18 months???[/quote]
So why do you want to pay a bloke over $1m if he isn’t any good?

woodublieve12 wrote:
you mean for a bloke who has had a year off injured and hasn't done a great deal for 18 months???

I can't see any party winning this deal.

PatowalongaPirate wrote:If he's not that good why do you want him lol?

Under contract for next year too which makes any price higher.

I didn't say 'I' wanted him... Fair chance the Swans don't either due to Sam McClure reporting it. But for a guy who is injury prone and his price wouldn't be as high as it was 12-24 months ago. But if i did want him i certainly wouldn't give up our pick 4 for him...

I'd rather go after Tippa if he was available

woodublieve12 wrote:I'd rather go after Tippa if he was available

Contract extension should be announced soon

Papley on the way out ?

Spargo wrote:Papley on the way out ?

unsure to be honest... There has been some talk, i hope not. But if he does he certainly hasn't hurt his chances of being worth a bit come trade time.

woodublieve12 wrote:

Spargo wrote:Papley on the way out ?

unsure to be honest... There has been some talk, i hope not. But if he does he certainly hasn't hurt his chances of being worth a bit come trade time.

I told you months ago he is going to carlton

Armchair expert wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Spargo wrote:Papley on the way out ?

unsure to be honest... There has been some talk, i hope not. But if he does he certainly hasn't hurt his chances of being worth a bit come trade time.

I told you months ago he is going to carlton

done, Papley for Cripps... Deal

woodublieve12 wrote:

Spargo wrote:Papley on the way out ?

unsure to be honest... There has been some talk, i hope not. But if he does he certainly hasn't hurt his chances of being worth a bit come trade time.

Swap for Mason Wood.