SA Footy

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

beef wrote:If all this true about wingard, surely Hinkley and Boak need to take some responsibility. They have obviously allowed it to go on. Pull him up on it early and he either changes or push him out. Can't complain about his behaviour/attitude if you do nothing about it. Actions you walk past are actions you accept.

stan wrote:

beef wrote:If all this true about wingard, surely Hinkley and Boak need to take some responsibility. They have obviously allowed it to go on. Pull him up on it early and he either changes or push him out. Can't complain about his behaviour/attitude if you do nothing about it. Actions you walk past are actions you accept.

Yep my thoughts exactly.

Leadership has failed and that is something I can safely comment on!

bertiebeatle wrote:

stan wrote:

beef wrote:If all this true about wingard, surely Hinkley and Boak need to take some responsibility. They have obviously allowed it to go on. Pull him up on it early and he either changes or push him out. Can't complain about his behaviour/attitude if you do nothing about it. Actions you walk past are actions you accept.

Yep my thoughts exactly.

Leadership has failed and that is something I can safely comment on!

I just got a message from a relative of an official at Port that Ken has lost the playing group

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

HH3 wrote:

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

But he's toxic isnt he?

Who would want to pay top dollar for a distraction?

MW wrote:

HH3 wrote:

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

But he's toxic isnt he?

Who would want to pay top dollar for a distraction?

Industry talks. I'd be taking 15 in a heartbeat but if Burton is thrown in by Hawthorn...why has this not been agreed too by Port?

MW wrote:

HH3 wrote:

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

But he's toxic isnt he?

Who would want to pay top dollar for a distraction?

Industry talks. I'd be taking 15 in a heartbeat but if Burton is thrown in by Hawthorn...why has this not been agreed too by Port?

Bum Crack wrote:

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

He'll be even crankier now that he's flying home from America today after being 1 week into a 3 week holiday in the States with the boys

bertiebeatle wrote:

stan wrote:

beef wrote:If all this true about wingard, surely Hinkley and Boak need to take some responsibility. They have obviously allowed it to go on. Pull him up on it early and he either changes or push him out. Can't complain about his behaviour/attitude if you do nothing about it. Actions you walk past are actions you accept.

Yep my thoughts exactly.

Leadership has failed and that is something I can safely comment on!

I just got a message from a relative of an official at Port that Ken has lost the playing group

Booney wrote:

MW wrote:

HH3 wrote:

Booney wrote:I'd have taken Burton and 15 and run. If Burton is as cranky at being thrown up as suggested then you'd think he'd also want out.

If we only get 15 for Wingard we've been shafted, again.

But he's toxic isnt he?

Who would want to pay top dollar for a distraction?

Industry talks. I'd be taking 15 in a heartbeat but if Burton is thrown in by Hawthorn...why has this not been agreed too by Port?

Maybe it hasn't been agreed to by Burton.

bertiebeatle wrote:

stan wrote:

beef wrote:If all this true about wingard, surely Hinkley and Boak need to take some responsibility. They have obviously allowed it to go on. Pull him up on it early and he either changes or push him out. Can't complain about his behaviour/attitude if you do nothing about it. Actions you walk past are actions you accept.

Yep my thoughts exactly.

Leadership has failed and that is something I can safely comment on!

I just got a message from a relative of an official at Port that Ken has lost the playing group

Brodlach wrote:Just jumped in the car and 5AA was on, they reckon (and Wildy would know as he is mates with Burtons dad) that Ryan has just purchased a home in Melbourne and his girlfriend moved across this year. That’s got to be a negative to come back

Brodlach wrote:Just jumped in the car and 5AA was on, they reckon (and Wildy would know as he is mates with Burtons dad) that Ryan has just purchased a home in Melbourne and his girlfriend moved across this year. That’s got to be a negative to come back

whufc wrote:I feel for Burton a tad

If he doesn’t perform he will be the bloke that cost Hawthorn Wingard.