by Brodlach » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:53 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Trader » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:54 am
Booney wrote:I like having 6 and 10, but we've given up Polec, Pittard + $200k, 11, 23, 30 and 49 to get it.
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:56 am
Brodlach wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Beams now wants to return to Collingwood.
Didn't he give a big yarn about being committed to Brisbane?
Doesn't just want to return to Melbourne but back to Collingwood, acting like a spoilt brat who has always got what he wants, hope Brisbane play hardball on this one.
Just for something different I disagree
Collingwood was excellent in letting him go to Brisbane because his dad was sick/dying. Now there is another personal issue back in Melbourne and needs to come back he feels he owes Collingwood. I get that
by Brodlach » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:58 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by beef » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:00 am
Brodlach wrote:You just can’t tell a player he is going to a certain team, he has to agree
by Brodlach » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:00 am
Trader wrote:Booney wrote:I like having 6 and 10, but we've given up Polec, Pittard + $200k, 11, 23, 30 and 49 to get it.
You can't count 11 and Polec both on the outs. As 11 came in for Polec.
Didn't we also give up 48 to North?
Also 10 was always ours, so you can't count that.
So by my count we've done the following:
In: 6,F3rd(45ish),F4th(65ish) = 2,188pts
Out: 23, 30, 48,49, Polec, Pittard = 2,033pts + 2 players.
So net we've had in: 155pts (equivalent of Pick 60), for Out: Polec and Pittard, plus we are still paying 200k of Pittard for the next two years.
When you add in the fact that this years draft is 'stronger' than next, and we've pushed current picks out for future ins, in reality it is even worse than the above.
We have had an absolutely shocking start to this year's trade period.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Brodlach » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:02 am
beef wrote:Brodlach wrote:You just can’t tell a player he is going to a certain team, he has to agree
Players should be traded wherever the club can get the best deal (in contract or not). Too much power for players.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by valleys07 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:14 am
Brodlach wrote:beef wrote:Brodlach wrote:You just can’t tell a player he is going to a certain team, he has to agree
Players should be traded wherever the club can get the best deal (in contract or not). Too much power for players.
I sort of agree but if your boss said today ‘pack your bags your now moving to Beaudesert” you’d be happy?
by beef » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:22 am
Brodlach wrote:beef wrote:Brodlach wrote:You just can’t tell a player he is going to a certain team, he has to agree
Players should be traded wherever the club can get the best deal (in contract or not). Too much power for players.
I sort of agree but if your boss said today ‘pack your bags your now moving to Beaudesert” you’d be happy?
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:35 am
Brodlach wrote:You just can’t tell a player he is going to a certain team, he has to agree
by tigerpie » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:37 am
by Trader » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:42 am
by JK » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:51 am
Brodlach wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Beams now wants to return to Collingwood.
Didn't he give a big yarn about being committed to Brisbane?
Doesn't just want to return to Melbourne but back to Collingwood, acting like a spoilt brat who has always got what he wants, hope Brisbane play hardball on this one.
Just for something different I disagree
Collingwood was excellent in letting him go to Brisbane because his dad was sick/dying. Now there is another personal issue back in Melbourne and needs to come back he feels he owes Collingwood. I get that
by gadj1976 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:01 pm
Trader wrote:Collingwood will obviously be willing to send back the same value they received from Brisbane when he first left?
Picks 5 and 25 wasn't it?
They can probably keep Crisp though give Beams is a little older now.
by BZB27 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:07 pm
by Booney » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:28 pm
BZB27 wrote:Crows trying to get pick 5 off Brisbane now
by BZB27 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:30 pm
by The Bedge » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:32 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Q. » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:32 pm
Beam's value has dropped considerably since thenJK wrote:Brodlach wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Beams now wants to return to Collingwood.
Didn't he give a big yarn about being committed to Brisbane?
Doesn't just want to return to Melbourne but back to Collingwood, acting like a spoilt brat who has always got what he wants, hope Brisbane play hardball on this one.
Just for something different I disagree
Collingwood was excellent in letting him go to Brisbane because his dad was sick/dying. Now there is another personal issue back in Melbourne and needs to come back he feels he owes Collingwood. I get that
Collingwood played hardball though from memory it cost Brisbane Crisp plus picks #5 and #25 - One of which became Jordan De Goey. Brisbane must play similar hardball.
by Booney » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:33 pm
BZB27 wrote:Id want either Rankine or Bailey Smith at 4
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |