Port Adelaide 2019

Talk on the national game

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Magellan » Fri Nov 08, 2019 10:00 am

"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has liked: 757 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby UK Fan » Fri Nov 08, 2019 10:11 am

LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.



How come crows haven’t experienced the same dramatic loss of fans if it’s just because it’s new ??

Are you suggesting PAFC forecast a 23% drop in crowds in the first 5 years of Adelaide Oval and everything is on track. I guess we will see in the financial reports.

KT sounds concerned about members dropping off.

https://m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/20 ... f-our-club
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5658
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1202 times
Been liked: 502 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby woodublieve12 » Fri Nov 08, 2019 10:38 am

UK Fan wrote:
LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.



How come crows haven’t experienced the same dramatic loss of fans if it’s just because it’s new ??

Are you suggesting PAFC forecast a 23% drop in crowds in the first 5 years of Adelaide Oval and everything is on track. I guess we will see in the financial reports.

KT sounds concerned about members dropping off.

https://m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/20 ... f-our-club


you seem more concerned about crowd numbers and membership than anyone on the board or any fan!!!
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17248
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3025 times
Been liked: 2401 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Trader » Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:13 am

whufc wrote:
Spangas wrote:
UK Fan wrote:
Booney wrote:CGAF > immediately asked pertinent question.

Is there a bigger spanner on this site? I'll wait.

Didn't think so.


CGAF about China and what appear to be figures that could only be considered “ball park” at best.

I would of thought reconnecting with members who have walked away in droves would be priority number one for the club atm.

I'd consider securing the financial future for any football club priority number one. 10K fans (although hypothetical) leaving doesn't even come close to the potential millions to be made from the China relationship.
On a side note: Fans who 'walk away' from any club are not fans, they're spectators.


I couldn't care about the Port situation but interested in general what 10K (I don't know how accurate that number is) would mean to a sporting club.

Let say out of those 10k lets say 75% of them were casual ticket purchases not members so we are left with 7500 the average cost of a ticket is $30 and they are guaranteed to play 11 home games a year. 7,500 x 30 x 11- $2,475,000

Let say each of those 82,500 who haven't showed up (7,500 x 11 home games) were going to spend $10 (very conservative) in the café/merch. $825,000 presuming they mark up 100% (its probably more) the loss of income would be around $400,000

A drop of 10,000 attendances could very conservatively be a loss of around 3mil a year on just entrance costs.

Full credit to people who run/manage football clubs having to deal with such fluctuations in numbers/finances based around performance which is so much out of your own control.


My understanding is those match day tickets go to the AFL, not to the home club (or at least a higher percentage??).
That's why clubs try so hard to sell 3 game memberships, as they keep the cash, rather than it going to the AFL.

Smaller crowds also mean less costs (don't open all food outlets, pay a smaller amount to the Govt for the footy express, etc.)

So the drop off to the club's bottom line would be less than $3m, but nevertheless, it's still a big impact!!
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4208
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:19 pm
Has liked: 60 times
Been liked: 794 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby mots02 » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:05 pm



Maybe a sponsorship opportunity with Port is possible?

A joint statement from PAFC and Krispy Kremes:

"After some initial hysteria related to some people's attraction to new shiny things, we've both been on a decline in popularity since 2014 - we think there's some great synergy between our brands and the type of people we attract"
User avatar
mots02
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 137 times
Been liked: 877 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Dutchy » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:13 pm

Booney wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Port made $500k revenue from China in 2019 if I read that correctly, is that before or after costs?

In an AFL world where clubs turnover $60-$100m even if it is profit its not huge $$$ for the effort, or are they still playing to long game here?


After costs, $500k contributed to the bottom line.

Are they still playing the long game, is that a rhetorical question? Of course it's the long game, you're hardly going to invest that level of resources into the strategy to make $500k in one year then turn your back on it. It has always been about increasing revenue streams from non-traditional revenue streams.

If that $500k can turn into $1m in two years, $2m in the years after and contribute to a positive financial result and paying debt down then the strategy is working. Just 4 years in and I feel as though the club will be more than happy with the results to date, particularly given the infrastructure now in place does not need reinvestment in the short term.


OK so $500k profit, be interesting to see if this is cream on the top of their general operations profit for the year or they need this just to tread water.

Agree if they can turn this into something bigger its worthwhile, if they can't then they need to ditch it.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44518
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2322 times
Been liked: 3496 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:36 pm

UK Fan wrote:
LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.



How come crows haven’t experienced the same dramatic loss of fans if it’s just because it’s new ??

Are you suggesting PAFC forecast a 23% drop in crowds in the first 5 years of Adelaide Oval and everything is on track. I guess we will see in the financial reports.

KT sounds concerned about members dropping off.

https://m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/20 ... f-our-club


Crows crowds have been consistent through their life, what was Ports crowds at Footy Park? Only an idiot with an axe to grind would think Port averaging 44k 2 years out of 22 is where they should be at. I have said it before, our attendance vs membership ratio is comparable to most clubs in the comp.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Booney » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:37 pm

LMA wrote:
UK Fan wrote:
LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.



How come crows haven’t experienced the same dramatic loss of fans if it’s just because it’s new ??

Are you suggesting PAFC forecast a 23% drop in crowds in the first 5 years of Adelaide Oval and everything is on track. I guess we will see in the financial reports.

KT sounds concerned about members dropping off.

https://m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/20 ... f-our-club


Crows crowds have been consistent through their life, what was Ports crowds at Footy Park? Only an idiot with an axe to grind would think Port averaging 44k 2 years out of 22 is where they should be at. I have said it before, our attendance vs membership ratio is comparable to most clubs in the comp.


Adelaide crowds are down 4000 from 2014 to 2019.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58343
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7491 times
Been liked: 10774 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:39 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:
UK Fan wrote:
LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.



How come crows haven’t experienced the same dramatic loss of fans if it’s just because it’s new ??

Are you suggesting PAFC forecast a 23% drop in crowds in the first 5 years of Adelaide Oval and everything is on track. I guess we will see in the financial reports.

KT sounds concerned about members dropping off.

https://m.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/20 ... f-our-club


you seem more concerned about crowd numbers and membership than anyone on the board or any fan!!!


It's his Porn =P~
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:41 pm

mots02 wrote:


Maybe a sponsorship opportunity with Port is possible?

A joint statement from PAFC and Krispy Kremes:

"After some initial hysteria related to some people's attraction to new shiny things, we've both been on a decline in popularity since 2014 - we think there's some great synergy between our brands and the type of people we attract"


Who doesn't love a donut. Your members even sit on them.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:48 pm

Bum Crack wrote:
LMA wrote:Oh dear, haven't we been through this already. Doesnt take a genius, nor a smart man even, to realise that in the first few years of something new (AO development) you always get interested parties initially until the novelty has waned. How many people are still queuing up at Krispy Kremes at Hindmarsh. Port attendance figures are down but only a fool would compare them now to 2014.

So the China experiment is currently in it's prime then as it's still relatively new?? Doesn't bode well for the future then.


Shit comparison, even your other name could do better than that.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby mots02 » Fri Nov 08, 2019 1:59 pm

LMA wrote:
mots02 wrote:


Maybe a sponsorship opportunity with Port is possible?

A joint statement from PAFC and Krispy Kremes:

"After some initial hysteria related to some people's attraction to new shiny things, we've both been on a decline in popularity since 2014 - we think there's some great synergy between our brands and the type of people we attract"


Who doesn't love a donut. Your members even sit on them.


And yet they are less fragile when it comes to regularly attending games than your mob :)
User avatar
mots02
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 137 times
Been liked: 877 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby amber_fluid » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:04 pm

China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2226 times
Been liked: 2520 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Booney » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:10 pm

amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58343
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7491 times
Been liked: 10774 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby amber_fluid » Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:14 pm

Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.


And this is why the coach should have been moved on too.
2020 with a new coach and expectations to play finals the following year with a new game plan.

Blind Freddy can see that Hinkley has lost the plot and the playing group.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2226 times
Been liked: 2520 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:00 pm

mots02 wrote:
LMA wrote:
mots02 wrote:Maybe a sponsorship opportunity with Port is possible?

A joint statement from PAFC and Krispy Kremes:

"After some initial hysteria related to some people's attraction to new shiny things, we've both been on a decline in popularity since 2014 - we think there's some great synergy between our brands and the type of people we attract"


Who doesn't love a donut. Your members even sit on them.


And yet they are less fragile when it comes to regularly attending games than your mob :)


More members = More crowd 8-}
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby LMA » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:05 pm

amber_fluid wrote:
Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.


And this is why the coach should have been moved on too.
2020 with a new coach and expectations to play finals the following year with a new game plan.

Blind Freddy can see that Hinkley has lost the plot and the playing group.


Can you tell Ol' Fred that Betts has past his expiry date, I don't think he's seen it yet.
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Dutchy » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:19 pm

Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.


Sounds just like Brisbane's recruiting strategy 10+ years ago, why is Vossy held in such high regard?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 44518
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2322 times
Been liked: 3496 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby Booney » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:25 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.


Sounds just like Brisbane's recruiting strategy 10+ years ago, why is Vossy held in such high regard?


By who?
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58343
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7491 times
Been liked: 10774 times

Re: Port Adelaide 2019

Postby amber_fluid » Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:50 pm

LMA wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:China is more important than falling attendances or heaven forbid actually playing finals.


I'm resigned to the fact we won't for a year or two.

They realised they ****** up at the end of 2017 with Watts,Rockliff,Motlop and that the group we had through '18 wasn't going to get us into contention. We've gone hard at the '18 draft, going hard again at this draft with the intent to turn the list over ASAP.

I still don't agree with the Howard trade, never will but I see they wanted high end draft picks to aim at young talent ( which Howard is ) and it wouldn't bother me if they came out and said the "moneyball" of the 2017 trade period didn't work and we're resetting. They don't have to, really, we can see it unfolding in front of us.


And this is why the coach should have been moved on too.
2020 with a new coach and expectations to play finals the following year with a new game plan.

Blind Freddy can see that Hinkley has lost the plot and the playing group.


Can you tell Ol' Fred that Betts has past his expiry date, I don't think he's seen it yet.


The Betts marketing ploy will bring in more coin than the China ‘experiment’, with a lot less effort too.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2226 times
Been liked: 2520 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: someguy1 and 33 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |