SA Footy

Just reporting what I've heard mate

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:Nicks has been told he's got the job apparently

Has known for a few days. I read somewhere Adelaide held off announcing it to give Port clear air for their copied, sorry new logo for 150 years.

Your club is an absolute shambles and you're still just trying to cast stones

One well know Twitter draft guru was asked if Grundy would be interested in joining Adelaide, the response was "Would he leave a powerhouse club in the premiership window for the burning zoo that is the Adelaide FC?"

Burning. Zoo.

Booney wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

MW wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:Nicks has been told he's got the job apparently

Has known for a few days. I read somewhere Adelaide held off announcing it to give Port clear air for their copied, sorry new logo for 150 years.

Your club is an absolute shambles and you're still just trying to cast stones

One well know Twitter draft guru was asked if Grundy would be interested in joining Adelaide, the response was "Would he leave a powerhouse club in the premiership window for the burning zoo that is the Adelaide FC?"

Burning. Zoo.

Twitter draft guru being the trade whisperer?

It was, regardless of the author it's fargen funny.

Yze this morning saying he hasn't been told he was unsuccessful, quality operator Fages

Dutchy wrote:Yze this morning saying he hasn't been told he was unsuccessful, quality operator Fages

If true, that is shit by Fagan and the club.

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Yze this morning saying he hasn't been told he was unsuccessful, quality operator Fages

If true, that is shit by Fagan and the club.

just another example of how poorly this club is run

Keep your skirts down boys.

Dutchy wrote:Yze this morning saying he hasn't been told he was unsuccessful, quality operator Fages

They still have decided yet........according to Roo.

MW wrote:Keep your skirts down boys.

c'mon mate, if true it's incredibly unprofessional...

If it's true yes.
Likely scenario is they've offered it to Nicks, going through the paperwork etc and will notify the others after it's official.

You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Not at our club mate.

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Not in any business I have dealt with.
You wait until you have your preferred applicant signed before you tell others they are not accepted. What if the preferred candidate falls over? Oh sorry, actually we do want you now...

Who said Nicks was coaching Crows??


Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

MW wrote:

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Not in any business I have dealt with.
You wait until you have your preferred applicant signed before you tell others they are not accepted. What if the preferred candidate falls over? Oh sorry, actually we do want you now...

So Yze would knock them back if the Nicks deal fell thru?

Its not hard to communicate, let Yze know where he stands FFS!

MW wrote:

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Not in any business I have dealt with.
You wait until you have your preferred applicant signed before you tell others they are not accepted. What if the preferred candidate falls over? Oh sorry, actually we do want you now...

I never thought I'd say this, but MW is correct

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Really??

Most businesses i have worked in are the opposite. You need the successful applicant to accept the job, before you start letting others know they haven't got it.

Just because the successful applicant is successful doesn't meant they always take the job. The $$$ might not be right, the finer contract T&C's may not work, another offer in between may have come.

I did have it happen once where the business told me i was unsuccesful only for their number 1 to fall through on company car details.

They rang me a week later and were really honest i was number 2 but now they wanted me.

Dont worry i stretched it out......and then positioned myself to take every cent available because i knew their 2 other applicants were miles below my level so they couldnt really afford not to take me now.

whufc wrote:

Dutchy wrote:You always advise the unsuccessful applicants 1st, then deal with the successful applicant, this is basic business.

Really??

All businesses i have worked in are the opposite. You need the successful applicant to accept the job, before you start letting others know they haven't got it.

Just because the successful applicant is successful doesn't meant they always take the job. The $$$ might not be right, the finer contract T&C's may not work, another offer in between may have come.

Dutchy wouldn’t know the correct way because North didn’t interview anyone and just gave the job to the first person they laid eyes on