SA Footy

whufc wrote:Tin foil hat time.

Collingwood were found to have broken the salary cap. Due to the pies not actually winning anything and the AFL not wanting to deal with a salary cap scandal tell Collingwood to have a total cleanout immediately. AFL then sweep it under the rug and its a win/win for both the AFL/Collingwood.

No other possible explanation makes sense for Collingwoods trade week.

I’d love to know the real story around Treloar.
Gotta be more to it than what’s been mentioned in the media.

amber_fluid wrote:

whufc wrote:Tin foil hat time.

Collingwood were found to have broken the salary cap. Due to the pies not actually winning anything and the AFL not wanting to deal with a salary cap scandal tell Collingwood to have a total cleanout immediately. AFL then sweep it under the rug and its a win/win for both the AFL/Collingwood.

No other possible explanation makes sense for Collingwoods trade week.

I’d love to know the real story around Treloar.
Gotta be more to it than what’s been mentioned in the media.

Collingwood list manager thrown the wife under the bus completely. They only considered the possibility of a trade once she had decided to play netball in Queensland.

whufc wrote:Tin foil hat time.

I think you're looking for the US politics thread mate.

RB wrote:

whufc wrote:Tin foil hat time.

I think you're looking for the US politics thread mate.

R n B Friday!

Dutchy wrote:

Booney wrote:GWS now have picks 10, 13, 15, 20, 29 and 30

Back to the good old days

You'll end up with a couple of them as they hunt pick 2 from you.

Give them 2 for 10 and 13 and you'd have 10,11,13,30. Looks better than 2,11,30.

whufc wrote:Tin foil hat time.

Collingwood were found to have broken the salary cap. Due to the pies not actually winning anything and the AFL not wanting to deal with a salary cap scandal tell Collingwood to have a total cleanout immediately. AFL then sweep it under the rug and its a win/win for both the AFL/Collingwood.

No other possible explanation makes sense for Collingwoods trade week.

The AFL integrity unit sign off on all trades.

They got wind of Adelaide/St Kilda playing around with Luke Dunstan and his salary with Crouch and the compensation pick deal and told the Crows/Sts no way it will happen. How then do Collingwood effectively trade Treloar for a future 2nd rounder and Phillips for 65?

Nathan Buckley on Twitter.

My toughest day in footy....bar none.

Managing contracted players who love the environment out of the club is a lose/lose situation in the short term.

The decisions aren’t popular but they were necessary.

I wish Adam, Jaidyn, Tom and Atu all the best at their new clubs.

Bum Crack wrote:

Dutchy wrote:@bum crack Booney says its his buy Round 1 next year, you just need to learn the words to NTUA

We better not be playing Geelong lol

We both hate them so we can share that at least.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

cracka wrote:Pretty accurate but I think a bit harsh on Essendon losing 3 players that didn't want to be there. What more could they have done. They've picked up 3 players & still got picks 6,7 & 8

https://www.afl.com.au/news/524214/that ... st-to-best

I thought Adelaide's 5/10 was a tad inflated given the players they lost and gained no one, North's (7), Brisbane's (7.5) and Geelong's (8) also seemed inflated.

I thought the Saints performed better than the Dogs but the poll shows otherwise.

Carlton and Port can sit at the bar for a bit longer on draft day as neither feature for some time.

Yeah, I would have had Essendon above Adelaide

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Booney wrote:GWS now have picks 10, 13, 15, 20, 29 and 30

Back to the good old days

You'll end up with a couple of them as they hunt pick 2 from you.

Give them 2 for 10 and 13 and you'd have 10,11,13,30. Looks better than 2,11,30.

We are definitely looking at trading up to pick 1 or 2. I’d imagine a combination of 6,7,8 in some way might get the Crows or North slightly interested

Booney wrote:Nathan Buckley on Twitter.

My toughest day in footy....bar none.

Managing contracted players who love the environment out of the club is a lose/lose situation in the short term.

The decisions aren’t popular but they were necessary.

I wish Adam, Jaidyn, Tom and Atu all the best at their new clubs.

Buckley, not had the best time of it since his tweet on Nov 2nd....[emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Lightning McQueen wrote:

cracka wrote:Pretty accurate but I think a bit harsh on Essendon losing 3 players that didn't want to be there. What more could they have done. They've picked up 3 players & still got picks 6,7 & 8

https://www.afl.com.au/news/524214/that ... st-to-best

I thought Adelaide's 5/10 was a tad inflated given the players they lost and gained no one, North's (7), Brisbane's (7.5) and Geelong's (8) also seemed inflated.

I thought the Saints performed better than the Dogs but the poll shows otherwise.

Carlton and Port can sit at the bar for a bit longer on draft day as neither feature for some time.

Adelaides was neither good or bad. Only two things they did was remove two players they didn’t want

Jim05 wrote:

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Booney wrote:GWS now have picks 10, 13, 15, 20, 29 and 30

Back to the good old days

You'll end up with a couple of them as they hunt pick 2 from you.

Give them 2 for 10 and 13 and you'd have 10,11,13,30. Looks better than 2,11,30.

We are definitely looking at trading up to pick 1 or 2. I’d imagine a combination of 6,7,8 in some way might get the Crows or North slightly interested

Adelaide will want Tilthorpe 100%. Adelaide boy, 200cm, 99kg forward / ruck. Exactly what they need to develop as back up for O'Brien and a replacement for Walker and, lol, Frampton.

Booney wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:[quote="Booney"]GWS now have picks 10, 13, 15, 20, 29 and 30

Back to the good old days

You'll end up with a couple of them as they hunt pick 2 from you.

Give them 2 for 10 and 13 and you'd have 10,11,13,30. Looks better than 2,11,30.

We are definitely looking at trading up to pick 1 or 2. I’d imagine a combination of 6,7,8 in some way might get the Crows or North slightly interested

Adelaide will want Tilthorpe 100%. Adelaide boy, 200cm, 99kg forward / ruck. Exactly what they need to develop as back up for O'Brien and a replacement for Walker and, lol, Frampton.[/quote]McDonald is better but has the WA go home factor. I think Tilthorpe being a SA boy will make the Crows reach for him as I think he is around the pick 5/6 mark.

I wonder if they go McDonald hoping Tilthorpe is still there at 9

Draft picks :

Adelaide 1, 9, 22, 23, 40, 56, 66, 80
Brisbane 25, 53, 58, 63, 68, 69, 94
Carlton 38, 48, 78
Collingwood 14, 16, 65, 70, 75, 92
Essendon 6, 7, 8, 44, 77, 85, 87
Fremantle 12, 32, 55
Geelong 51, 96
Gold Coast 5, 27, 37, 76, 84
GWS 10, 13, 15, 20, 29, 52, 74, 88
Hawthorn 4, 24, 45, 46, 49, 72
Melbourne 18, 19, 28, 50, 89
North Melbourne 2, 11, 30, 39, 71, 81
Port Adelaide 35, 47, 57, 59, 73, 95
Richmond 17, 36, 61, 79, 97
St Kilda 21, 64, 67, 74, 93
Sydney 3, 31, 34, 43, 60, 82
West Coast 62, 86, 91
Western Bulldogs 26, 33, 41, 42, 54, 90

Brodlach wrote:I wonder if they go McDonald hoping Tilthorpe is still there at 9

Wells will get him at pick 51

Brodlach wrote:I wonder if they go McDonald hoping Tilthorpe is still there at 9

We want one of McDonald or Tilthorpe. No chance he gets past us.
I don’t see McDonald getting past 2 IMO

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Booney wrote:GWS now have picks 10, 13, 15, 20, 29 and 30

Back to the good old days

You'll end up with a couple of them as they hunt pick 2 from you.

Give them 2 for 10 and 13 and you'd have 10,11,13,30. Looks better than 2,11,30.

No chance the Roos give up Pick 2, never ever had a pick this low, a risk not worth taking.

Bum Crack wrote:

Brodlach wrote:I wonder if they go McDonald hoping Tilthorpe is still there at 9

Wells will get him at pick 51

What do you care, Port supporter