by Booney » Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:17 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:35 pm
Booney wrote:AFLW $10 for adults U18 free.
by Booney » Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:51 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:AFLW $10 for adults U18 free.
This’ll be interesting to see what effect it has on crowds.
What’s their rationale with charging now?
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 10, 2020 3:16 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:AFLW $10 for adults U18 free.
This’ll be interesting to see what effect it has on crowds.
What’s their rationale with charging now?
They've got no money from the losses of 2020 I assume.
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:20 pm
DOC wrote:NOW???
Just woken up Rip Van Amber?
by Brodlach » Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:20 pm
amber_fluid wrote:DOC wrote:NOW???
Just woken up Rip Van Amber?
I thought the AFL were going to promote, support and grow the women’s Comp.
Obviously not now
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by amber_fluid » Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:22 pm
Brodlach wrote:amber_fluid wrote:DOC wrote:NOW???
Just woken up Rip Van Amber?
I thought the AFL were going to promote, support and grow the women’s Comp.
Obviously not now
For how long, it’s been about 4 years already.
by reppoh_eht » Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:07 am
The definition of ‘High’ contact expanded to cover if there is a careless or intentional dangerous tackle which has the potential for injury to be caused through dangerous high contact with the ground but where high contact does not actually occur;
The guideline in relation to upgrading impact based on the potential to cause injury expanded to capture all intentional strikes (not limited to head-high strikes only); and
The ‘contesting the ball’ exception in relation to high bumps and forceful front-on contact tightened by changing the requirement that "the Player was contesting the ball and did not have a realistic alternative way to contest the ball" to "the Player was contesting the ball and it was reasonable for the Player to contest the ball in that way".
by Booney » Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:42 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:56 am
by Dutchy » Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:59 am
Booney wrote:AFLW $10 for adults U18 free.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:14 am
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:AFLW $10 for adults U18 free.
So if they get 500 paying adults its a $5k return, less admin for having to ticket the game, Im not sure if this will be the cash inflow they hope
by Spargo » Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:23 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
by Brodlach » Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:26 am
Spargo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
I’ve got Sydney & Essendon as bottom 4 locks.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Spargo » Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:38 am
Brodlach wrote:Spargo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
I’ve got Sydney & Essendon as bottom 4 locks.
Other 2?
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:41 am
Most definitely us.Spargo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
I’ve got Sydney & Essendon as bottom 4 locks.
by woodublieve12 » Fri Dec 11, 2020 1:21 pm
Spargo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
I’ve got Sydney & Essendon as bottom 4 locks.
by Spargo » Fri Dec 11, 2020 1:29 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Sydney one rung above where I'd have them.
Freo is hard to gauge.
*They were great and terrible last year.
*Longmuir's 2nd year at the helm.
*They have the best player in the comp IMO.
*A bunch of no names giving it a red hot crack.
I like watching the improvement of Taberner and Walters each season.
I’ve got Sydney & Essendon as bottom 4 locks.
Swans will make the 8.....
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |