AFL Round 13 - The longest yard

[stan]

Gets Ports doctor in the RAH ED, would end ramping with how fast he can assess players.

Bull shit, Nothing wrong with the assessing in the ED that's done within four hours

Horseshit, Ports doc can assess in 4 minutes

Complete horseshit.

When was she last time you went to the ED and saw a doctor within 8 hrs let alone 4 hrs.

[Booney]

The AFL has reviewed the Jonas and Butters collision and is satisfied @PAFC “complied with AFL’s concussion guidelines in the management of the players.”

So STFU.

[MW]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

[amber_fluid]

Why don’t independent doctors make the assessment and final call so the club doctor doesn’t have too?

[Booney]

Why don’t independent doctors make the assessment and final call so the club doctor doesn’t have too?

Suggesting in 2022 that doctors, whether affiliated with a club or otherwise, would over see an intentional disregard for concussion is absurd and if done in writing bordering on defamatory.

[Booney]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

So the 2016 mud you found on Facebook is worth repeating but this is an obvious outcome? F*ck mate, this the look you want?

[MW]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

So the 2016 mud you found on Facebook is worth repeating but this is an obvious outcome? F*ck mate, this the look you want?

The comment about 2016 is valid...Ken is defending a club dr who has cleared a player incorrectly before with a concussion.
But the rest is trolling 100% cause I hate Port.

[Dutchy]

Everything you have said is 100% correct, however now there is a head clash this weekend in local footy, there will be doubt cause at the highest level 2 players were still OK to play. Its the optics it delivers that it may still be OK to play a player in the lower leagues after a head clash.

The message the game is trying to (rightfully) spread is not helped with last nights decisions. The AFL need to come out and support and explain the decision ASAP if it was the correct call.

Its simple really mate, head knock in community footy you're off.

Head knock at State league or AFL level, get assessed by the credentialed medical professional at the ground and make an informed clinical assessment as to if the player can continue or needs to stay off.

No confusion at all.

If it was that simple there would be no confusion, head knocks are still assessed by trainers at grass roots level who are making the same calls as the AFL doc's.

[Booney]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

So the 2016 mud you found on Facebook is worth repeating but this is an obvious outcome? F*ck mate, this the look you want?

The comment about 2016 is valid...Ken is defending a club dr who has cleared a player incorrectly before with a concussion.
But the rest is trolling 100% cause I hate Port.

Little brother fighting back, good for you.

[Brodlach]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

We’ll never have to hear about the camp again #muckraking

[Booney]

Was it ever going to be any different?
Even if found guilty, what's the point in fining a club that has no money and you're bailing out constantly...like giving yourself a fine.

We’ll never have to hear about the camp again #muckraking

2 little brothers....

[MW]

[Booney]

“The Chief Medical Officer has reviewed the HawkEye vision of the collision last night between Port Adelaide players Jonas and Butters. He has also reviewed the management of the players at the time including the sideline assessment and HawkEye evaluation by the club doctors,” the statement read.

“Ultimately, there was no clinical indication of concussion that warranted further investigation and testing, thus the club doctors allowing both players to return to the field.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-20 ... QvuRrB7v5c


But, that was always going to be the case. You know, given the AFL aren't particularly interested in concussion at the moment and, you know, would jump at an opportunity to remind clubs of their duty of care. Nah, always going to be this.

[MW]

“The Chief Medical Officer has reviewed the HawkEye vision of the collision last night between Port Adelaide players Jonas and Butters. He has also reviewed the management of the players at the time including the sideline assessment and HawkEye evaluation by the club doctors,” the statement read.

“Ultimately, there was no clinical indication of concussion that warranted further investigation and testing, thus the club doctors allowing both players to return to the field.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-20 ... QvuRrB7v5c


But, that was always going to be the case. You know, given the AFL aren't particularly interested in concussion at the moment and, you know, would jump at an opportunity to remind clubs of their duty of care. Nah, always going to be this.

This is all just a distraction on the main topic that Port lost

[Brodlach]

“The Chief Medical Officer has reviewed the HawkEye vision of the collision last night between Port Adelaide players Jonas and Butters. He has also reviewed the management of the players at the time including the sideline assessment and HawkEye evaluation by the club doctors,” the statement read.

“Ultimately, there was no clinical indication of concussion that warranted further investigation and testing, thus the club doctors allowing both players to return to the field.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-20 ... QvuRrB7v5c


But, that was always going to be the case. You know, given the AFL aren't particularly interested in concussion at the moment and, you know, would jump at an opportunity to remind clubs of their duty of care. Nah, always going to be this.

This is all just a distraction on the main topic that Port lost

Only one win in front of us, amazing!

[Booney]

At least cracka had the guts to keep arguing when he was wrong, you folded far too easily.

[Booney]

“The Chief Medical Officer has reviewed the HawkEye vision of the collision last night between Port Adelaide players Jonas and Butters. He has also reviewed the management of the players at the time including the sideline assessment and HawkEye evaluation by the club doctors,” the statement read.

“Ultimately, there was no clinical indication of concussion that warranted further investigation and testing, thus the club doctors allowing both players to return to the field.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-20 ... QvuRrB7v5c


But, that was always going to be the case. You know, given the AFL aren't particularly interested in concussion at the moment and, you know, would jump at an opportunity to remind clubs of their duty of care. Nah, always going to be this.

This is all just a distraction on the main topic that Port lost

Only one win in front of us, amazing!

Highlighting someone in 12th is above you, only Adelaide.

[MW]

At least cracka had the guts to keep arguing when he was wrong, you folded far too easily.

Me? folded what?
i stand by what I said, there is no way AFL were going to rule any different when it is practically Port's word vs someone watching a ch7 replay.
But what would a little brother know

[Brodlach]

I didn’t expect us to win a game and I thought you’d be top 4.

If that makes you happy then I’m glad I’ve enlightened your day

[Brodlach]

Some little brothers are smarter than big brothers. I resemble that