SA Footy

Bum Crack wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Bum Crack enters the chat

No need for me to say anything. I saw how well North were against Geelong the other week.

Harsh judging them against this years premiers.

Booney wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Bum Crack enters the chat

No need for me to say anything. I saw how well North were against Geelong the other week.

Harsh judging them against this years premiers.

July premiers.

Team to beat right now. Melbourne have got massive problems, Brisbane have missed the boat, Fremantle the real threat to Geelong and on the MCG I can't see that happening.

whufc wrote:
Larkey- In the top 10 big forwards in the game at the moment...only 24 will only get better. Is/will be an A grade forward.

Is he better than anyone listed below?
Daniher
Cameron
Hawkins
Reiwoldt
Franklin
Naughton
Curnow
McKay
2x Kings

Even Marshall and Tex are in front of him

whufc wrote:
Larkey- In the top 10 big forwards in the game at the moment...only 24 will only get better. Is/will be an A grade forward.

Is he better than anyone listed below?
Daniher
Cameron
Hawkins
Reiwoldt
Franklin
Naughton
Curnow
McKay
2x Kings

Even Marshall and Tex are in front of him

whufc wrote:Larkey- In the top 10 big forwards in the game at the moment..

I don't see it.

Mr Beefy wrote:

whufc wrote:
Larkey- In the top 10 big forwards in the game at the moment...only 24 will only get better. Is/will be an A grade forward.

Is he better than anyone listed below?
Daniher
Cameron
Hawkins
Reiwoldt
Franklin
Naughton
Curnow
McKay
2x Kings

Even Marshall and Tex are in front of him

Fogarty?

Armchair expert wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:

whufc wrote:
Larkey- In the top 10 big forwards in the game at the moment...only 24 will only get better. Is/will be an A grade forward.

Is he better than anyone listed below?
Daniher
Cameron
Hawkins
Reiwoldt
Franklin
Naughton
Curnow
McKay
2x Kings

Even Marshall and Tex are in front of him

Fogarty?

He said top 10 not top 50

He'd be close.
Fair enough collingwood defence was depleted without Moore but his second efforts and hard running were pretty impressive.

tigerpie wrote:He'd be close.
Fair enough collingwood defence was depleted without Moore but his second efforts and hard running were pretty impressive.

Top 10 forwards dont have to worry too much about those things...

Mr Beefy wrote:

tigerpie wrote:He'd be close.
Fair enough collingwood defence was depleted without Moore but his second efforts and hard running were pretty impressive.

Top 10 forwards dont have to worry too much about those things...

Fair point, you don't need second efforts if you are getting titted by elite kicks.