SA Footy

Posted: **Sun Jun 25, 2023 4:55 pm**

Spargo wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Look above.

Everyone saw it. Crows had plenty of chances but Collingwood got a leg up all day from the umpiring.

Yep agree, as I said above too many missed opportunities

I’m as salty as ####

Posted: **Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:06 pm**

Absolutely the Crows were robbed.
Right in front of me.
Right in front of me!

Posted: **Sun Jun 25, 2023 5:37 pm**

Brodlach wrote:
Spargo wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Look above.

Everyone saw it. Crows had plenty of chances but Collingwood got a leg up all day from the umpiring.

Yep agree, as I said above too many missed opportunities

I’m as salty as ####

Stevic has form at the g

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 7:28 am**

I guess the umps were getting some payback for their display earlier in the year at AO between the two sides.

Collingwood were able to overcome poor umpiring earlier in the year. The Crows weren't yesterday.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:26 am**

Still salty

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:29 am**

Still?

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:30 am**

Brodlach wrote:Still salty

You'll get over it eventually

Lots to like about your game style and you'll at least be around the mark in September.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:05 am**

Booney wrote:Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:08 am**

Brodlach wrote:
Booney wrote:Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:04 pm**

daysofourlives wrote:Stocker's tackle last night escapes any sanction from the MRO, absolutely disgusting that he gets nothing while Sicily gets 3.
I want to hear from the AFL over this one. So basically their crackdown comes down to luck, not the act, whether its deliberate or accidental doesnt matter. it only matters if they hit their head. If this is the case Rohan should be suspended as clearly its the result that matters not how it happens.

Yep, you should be ******* filthy.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:08 pm**

DOC wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:Stand rule sucks

Yep. Another legacy from that shit stain Steven Hocking.

Think it also has to be considered in the debacle that is play-on. Sometimes only need to blink sideways and it gets called play on.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:24 pm**

Brodlach wrote:Well done Collingwood

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:37 pm**

woodublieve12 wrote:

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:50 pm**

woodublieve12 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Well done Collingwood

2016: +12 Western Bulldogs 20 — Sydney Swans 8

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:03 pm**

Booney wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
Booney wrote:Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

I’m in the 24 hour zone, Wubbzy is in the 24 years zone

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:13 pm**

Brodlach wrote:
Booney wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
Booney wrote:Still?

Suggesting I’m always salty?

Not at all. You're in the 24 hour window so it's ok.

John Cahill had that as a rule for his players, you get 24 hours to have the sads after a loss then you get back on with it. Good philosophy but hardly surprising that Cahill put something in place that works.

I’m in the 24 hour zone, Wubbzy is in the 24 years zone

if it cost you a flag there is no expiry date

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 1:21 pm**

FlyingHigh wrote:
DOC wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:Stand rule sucks

Yep. Another legacy from that shit stain Steven Hocking.

Think it also has to be considered in the debacle that is play-on. Sometimes only need to blink sideways and it gets called play on.

Unless you are having a shot at goal then your "natural arc" can have you standing right next to the guy on mark, its a farce.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 3:20 pm**

Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 3:42 pm**

carey wrote:Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

Yep, they're out there and walking among us.
They can have a certain bias against certain players however.

Posted: **Mon Jun 26, 2023 3:44 pm**

carey wrote:Do people actually think that Umpire's go out and purposely try to cheat to favour a side?

nope. but just like players. umpires have stinkers too

SA Footy

AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15

Re: AFL Round 15