Bag & Sledge wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the $1.10 shots that have either won or lost theres a chance that MAL has put them up on betfair
Seriously, you might dominate with the 1.20 pops but one loss and you are back to square 1!!!!
The most logical post on this thread by B/SLEDGE
Inevitably $1-20 will get beat and all the hard work is down the gurgler
To put things in perspective
I tip a LATE MAL when I think its unbeatable
I usually tip what I have at $1-10 in my assessments
Truthfully unless Im sure of getting $1-30 + I wont back em
When I get set odds of $1-40 + on Betfair I launch
I had TIGER OREILLY $1-10 earlier this year and feasted on the $1-60
The $1-20 CLARENDON ELECTRA was almost a bet but I declined
I did however lay most of the field on Betfair
FWIW
If I declare a LATE MAL it can also mean
Dont bet against it
Or if you do bet against it lessen your investment
ANOTHER EXAMPLE
I have rated ST $1-10 to beat the PANTHERs this week
If the bookies go up a $1-30 + I will back em
This is a scale of ratio betting I suggest
$1-20... NO BET
$1-30... $100
$1-40....$200
$1-50 ....$300
$1-60....$400
$1-70.....$500
The bigger the value the bigger the bet
I use a similar principal in backing them at SA trots as well [but far less amounts]
With Clarendon Electra I did suggest I was looking for $1-33 or better to back it
i'm sure it helps some to put a late mal one out in a treble,quaddie etc which could end up with a few notes rather than coins 
