Greyhounds This Week

[mighty_tiger_79]

race 8

8 is my top pick dangers are 4,5,6

race 9

1,4,6

race 10

1,3,4

race 11

last leg of quaddie 4 and then take field

[mighty_tiger_79]

3 races over the 388m at angle park today, im sure MAL will be watching!!!!


11 - 6 hannah mclaren - best dog in this by a mile, will be around $1.40 but should be winning

[mighty_tiger_79]

angle park

11 - 6

another shorty but go more the place here

[mighty_tiger_79]

on a roll on the dishlickers

now i said that KING ASHY angle park 8-1 wont win, but it should

[mighty_tiger_79]

king ashy wins at nice short odds $1.20

GAWLER

race 1 - 3 allen goyo - its a maiden race, stake this on a 2x8 system

2 - 6 stomping bear - class act in this race, the draw is the only query

6 -1 wheres cisco - should lead and from the red should land 6 lengths in front and win running away

8 - 1 wheres pancho - drawn to lead and win. the 2 dog looks a good anchor to run in the placings but a bit of a non winner

ill be looking at going all up these selections as doubles/trebles/quaddie

[mighty_tiger_79]

good start at gawler - 2 down for 2 winners

[mighty_tiger_79]

beautiful results at gawler

4 from 4

short odds but good when going the all up

[mighty_tiger_79]

listening to hot dogs, the bookie peter dammerell is giving up at gawler. Really no surprise when v. Gray sets the markets at 150% +

everytime you compare bookie v tote the tote wins 99.999% of the time.

As ray fewings mentioned v.g should be more competitive given his knowledge or he should focus more on customers rather then betting via betfair.

[mal]

listening to hot dogs, the bookie peter dammerell is giving up at gawler. Really no surprise when v. Gray sets the markets at 150% +

everytime you compare bookie v tote the tote wins 99.999% of the time.

As ray fewings mentioned v.g should be more competitive given his knowledge or he should focus more on customers rather then betting via betfair.

i would delete that BF reference at the end of your post
i would stop at KNOWLEDGE and delete the rest

[Groover]

Big night @ Angle park tonight so I shal run through a couple tips just incase im lucky

R1 - 1 and 3
R2 - 1, 2 and 5
R3 - 2 and 5
R4 - 2, 4 and 6
R5 - 5 and 6
R6 - 6 and 7
R7 - 6 and 8
R8 - 1 and 5 have the class edge
R9 - f4 3,8/3,8/1,4,6/1,4,6
R10 - 7
R11 - 8 wins

[Johno6]

TONIGHT CANNINGTON RACE 3 #3 FRANTIC FUSION

[mighty_tiger_79]

time for another collect

traralgon race 2

only 5 and 8 can win this

i also give the 7 a rough place chance

[mighty_tiger_79]

time for another collect

traralgon race 2

only 5 and 8 can win this

i also give the 7 a rough place chance

5 wins at $3.60

the 8 was no where to be seen and the 7 never got into the race

[mighty_tiger_79]

cannington

4 - 6
5 - 1
7 - 5
9-7
10-8

[mighty_tiger_79]

cannington

4 - 6
5 - 1
7 - 5
9-7
10-8

all winners at prohibitive odds

[mighty_tiger_79]

from the telegraph jan 25

A PUNTER yesterday revived memories of Eddie Hayson and Steven Fletcher's notorious Lucy's Light greyhound sting when he pulled off an audacious betting plunge on a dog race at Horsham.
In almost identical circumstances to the 2005 sting at the Gold Coast, the Maitland local manipulated the place pool with the NSW TAB and UNITAB before launching a significant plunge with corporate bookmakers around the country.

More than $20,000 was wagered on two dogs, Stack 'Em Flat and Echelon, to run a place in the five-dog opening race at the country Victorian track in the hope of winning $150,000.

The place pools in NSW and UNITAB were manipulated by having carefully calculated place bets on the three remaining dogs, dramatically reducing their prices and inflating the two he wished to back with separate bookies.

Echelon was the $1.60 favourite to win and $7.10 to place, while Stack 'Em Flat was $2.40 and $9.10 for the place.

With the tote pools manipulated, Stack 'Em Flat and Echelon smashed their rivals to finish first and second - the perfect result as both bets won.

Four corporate bookmakers - Sportingbet, Betchoice, Centrebet and Betstar - were hit by the punter, who opened new accounts with the bookies just hours before the race.

None of the four bookmakers paid the full amount to the punter, claiming they have terms and conditions which prevent the payments that are the result of manipulated pools.

The punter, who wished not to be named, told The Daily Telegraph he was a friend of Fletcher's and he had played a part in the Lucy's Light sting, which ripped more than $1 million from bookmakers across the country.

South Australian bookmaker Curly Seal initially refused to pay Eddie Hayson $700,000 but the pair later settled out of court.

[mighty_tiger_79]

Punter pulls off great greyhound sting but is denied cash

Brent Zerafa
The Daily Telegraph
January 25, 2012

THIS sting hadn't been planned for months, it was a spur of the moment stab at winning $150,000.
After gazing at the form for the twilight meeting at Horsham early yesterday, it immediately appeared the perfect race to pull off the plunge.

Despite the race being a handicap with dogs starting from staggered boxes, Stack 'Em Flat and Echelon looked head and shoulders above their rivals in the opening race. They would start from the two inside boxes, there was three scratchings and in the opinion of the punter, the three remaining rivals were hopeless.

Having been a part of the Lucy's Light sting from 2005, the punter - a high-profile greyhound owner who also works for a bookmaker - had the perfect blueprint to once again get plenty of bang for his buck. The plan would be to manipulate the place pools of the NSW tote and UNITAB by having calculated amounts on the three dogs which he gave no chance.

This would dramatically reduce their place price and as a result, inflate the price of the two dogs he thought would fight out the finish.

From there he would back both dogs with four corporate bookmakers who offer "middle tote", paying the middle dividend of the three totaliser pools in Australia. With the accounts loaded, the bets on Stack 'Em Flat and Echelon were placed at 4.02pm, exactly two minutes before jump-time so that the bookies would not be alerted to the sting.

Just before the bunny rolled in to action, the button was pressed to place the bets on the three other dogs and the stage was set.

The result couldn't have been any better, Stack 'Em Flat won by just over a metre from Echelon, with their rivals 13 metres away in third.

In Victoria, Stack 'Em Flat's official winning dividend was $2.00 while Echelon started $1.80 favourite.

But the perfect ending wasn't to be with the bookies smelling a sting.

With the Lucy's Light sting still fresh in the minds, safe guards were established in the terms and conditions of bookmakers to prevent liability of paying out bets that are results of tote manipulation.

"I am just very disappointed in the corporates (bookmakers), they want to take your money and if the dog gets beat or breaks down they would be happily taking my money," the punter said.

"We invested $20,000 hoping to win about $120,000, clear that figure at least.

"We've won, but not too much about, $20,000 or something."

Sportingbet bet originally paid the full amount of $66,000 but reduced the pay-out to $30,000, Centrebet returned $16,000, Betchoice $8,000 and Betstar suspended the bets. Tabcorp have previously raised integrity concerns with corporate bookies offering tote products as they believe it carries the risk of tote manipulation.

[mighty_tiger_79]

the bets placed were

centrebet

$3000 each paid $16k

sportingbet

$5k = $30k

betchoice

$2k = $8k

betstar

$500ew = suspended

nsw tote had $4k place on 3 dogs while unitab had $2700 on those for the place

[A Mum]

I think this might be the most appropriate place to say...

Happy Birthday Groover

Hope you've had an awesome day

[Groover]

the bets placed were

centrebet

$3000 each paid $16k

sportingbet

$5k = $30k

betchoice

$2k = $8k

betstar

$500ew = suspended

nsw tote had $4k place on 3 dogs while unitab had $2700 on those for the place

Bet they would have happily taken his money had both his dogs lost!

I say fair game because there is still a risk involved, if the bookies want to offer middle div then they should be liable to payout no matter what!
The bookie can't always be the winner...