SA Footy

BAYMAN is having success backing teams that bat 2nd in 20/20 games.
He has had 2 bets for 2 wins.
SA V NS
VI V WA
BAYMAN waits for the toss see who bats first and backs the opposing team.
The sides that won the toss batted in both games
Why are they batting first according to BAYMAN


Is Batting 2ND a new formula for winning on these 20/20 games ?

I dont think so
I think the teams batting 2nd should not have a distinct advantage.
In all forms of cricket I say bat first in any form of game and get the runs on the board.

I reckon if you are a good batting team ,bat first and show your strength.

BAYMAN has said to me before the last 2 games that sides batting 2nd have
won about 15 of the last 17 games.

I think its coincidental and sides that bat first will eventually win again
I had 3 20/20 bets in the last 3 years, all teams batted first and won.

But is BAYMAN on a cachinggggy formula ?

IT IS ACTUALLY THE LAST 3 GAMES & I AM SORRY FOR TRYING TO HELP PEOPLE TRY & MAKE MONEY WITH THIS STAT

Im merely pointing out that you are winning but its illogical to think
that you have masterminded a formula to win.
You have bet on 2 or 3 games and won
The formula needs to stand the test of time on say 20 games before I will be convinced.

Word of warning Dont bet against VI if they bat first in future
Vi if they bat first will beat you more often than not

I think games involving VI/TA/WA the formula will not work as you expect

When SA/NS bat first it seems logical to back the opposition batting 2nd

QL ???? need to see who is available

All Im saying is tread warily
Sides batting first will win a lot more games than you think

Ive 100% record on teams batting first at this format[3 bets]

3 from 3 is 100% as well & as i said i'm sorry for passing on something i heard to try & help so i'll say nothing in the future as obvious my thoughts & opinions aren't worthy enough

BAYMAN. We all know that the LATE MAL is the only true formula for making money and MAL doesnt want any competition from you no matter how successful your theorey may turn out to be.

i think that givens BAYMANs illogical successful system on 20/20 is working people play that system until the tide starts to turn the other way............

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i think that givens BAYMANs illogical successful system on 20/20 is working people play that system until the tide starts to turn the other way............

And Mals 100% record of sides batting first winning ???????????????????????????????????
why dont you follow both systems MT79 and back both teams !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mal wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i think that givens BAYMANs illogical successful system on 20/20 is working people play that system until the tide starts to turn the other way............

And Mals 100% record of sides batting first winning ???????????????????????????????????
why dont you follow both systems MT79 and back both teams !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

small difference MAL

BAYMANS record is including every game

not the selected games you have invested on

personally i dont invest in it but if a selection became A lATE MAL then i may have to reconsider

SA GAMES LAST SEASON
sides batting first listed first

VI 203 SA 169
WA 193 SA 138
SA 150 NS 142 [this is the game I backed SA on principal because Andrew Johns played]
SA 147 QL 128

4 games
all won by the teams batting first

THIS SEASON

SA 134 NS 135

1 game and the side batting 2nd won on this occasion

thats 4-1 sides batting first last 5 games involving SA

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

mal wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:i think that givens BAYMANs illogical successful system on 20/20 is working people play that system until the tide starts to turn the other way............

And Mals 100% record of sides batting first winning ???????????????????????????????????
why dont you follow both systems MT79 and back both teams !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

small difference MAL

BAYMANS record is including every game

not the selected games you have invested on

personally i dont invest in it but if a selection became A lATE MAL then i may have to reconsider

MT in the long run it will even out
Over a 5 year period dont be surprised if the sides batting first win more games

In the 2 finals played the sides batting first won as well
VI BEAT TA last year
VI BEAT NS the year before[i backed VI in that game]

MAL with your resources you can go out and find individual results on all sates and put up the results of batting first and winning etc...

we have SA 4-1 over the last season plus this season

Strong batting teams that bat first should win more games then they lose.
Thats my logic and Im sticking to it.
Sides that score 170 -200 runs should win these games most times
At times opposition sides can win chasing 170+ but cant remember to many