SA Footy

port $1.80
eag $1.80

west $1.60
sturt $2.20

glen $2.40
sth $1.50

at those prices i'd back sturt i'll go my winnings from last week all up at that price

Eagles ($1.80) into Sturt ($2.20)= Christmas Day ($3.96)

THE $1-47 WC V SS on Sportsbet appeals.

If Cheatbet are betting $1-47 the others will no
doubt be betting $1-50.

Glen vs South looks a bit lop sided in the market when you consider where these two sides are on the ladder. South threw away the game against North (and others earlier this year) and the Bays have some real good results this year (eg Central win of 20 goals). Any suggestions as to why the disparity here?

Johnny's betting 2/1 the field for the Magarey (6/4 if the player has been suspended).
AFL listed players who've played 2 SANFL games or less are 4/1.

With all that value, who should we back?

Squawk wrote:Glen vs South looks a bit lop sided in the market when you consider where these two sides are on the ladder. South threw away the game against North (and others earlier this year) and the Bays have some real good results this year (eg Central win of 20 goals). Any suggestions as to why the disparity here?

Also, South are the Bays bitches...

Punk Rooster wrote:

Squawk wrote:Glen vs South looks a bit lop sided in the market when you consider where these two sides are on the ladder. South threw away the game against North (and others earlier this year) and the Bays have some real good results this year (eg Central win of 20 goals). Any suggestions as to why the disparity here?

Also, South are the Bays bitches...

****************************************************************************

NORTH ADELAIDE SAVES THE WORLD
They stopped South Adelaide last week.

bayman wrote:
west $1.60
sturt $2.20

For the second week in a row, Johnny has provided some very generous odds for the team playing against the mighty West Adelaide. Does he still think we are living in 1983 or something?

Ecky wrote:

bayman wrote:
west $1.60
sturt $2.20

For the second week in a row, Johnny has provided some very generous odds for the team playing against the mighty West Adelaide. Does he still think we are living in 1983 or something?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

3 times JOKETON has gifted Weak Adelaide to us in 2006

rd1 WA V PA...............PA $1-48
rd6 ST V WA...............ST $1-60
rd14 WA V NW............NW $2-00

The prices keep getting better this week ST @ $2-20 [FAIR BET]
Just maybe and it would not surprise me with this clown
if we get $2-50 GL in rd16
and we get $3-00 EG in rd 17.....................................................

Always remember Johhny JOKETON on your calender
APRIL 1st ODDS with DECEMBER 25th results.

When we do our prayers lets all thank god for delivering JOKETON to us.

I once put down $5 at 10/1 with Joketon at 3/4 time at the Parade vs Sturt one year. Bet was for no goals to be kicked in the final quarter. It was dumping rain at about 25mm hour and had been all game and only about 7 goals had been kicked all night. There was so much water on the ground that carp were migrating in and ducks were mating in the centre circle. Just prior to the final siren S Bassett marked in the goalsquare. Siren went and his kick was taken after the siren. I quirmed at wahat could have been but believe it or not, he missed. Just goes to show how wet it was, how heavy the socks and boots were, how logged the ball was and how crap the footing was. Ran and collected my $55 with a big smile at the 10/1 odds cleaned up and Joketon tried to tell me that Bassett had kicked the goal! Finally convinced him he was wrong and he paid up.

Never forgot that bet!

Get on Sturt that price wont last surely.... you sharks will make sure of that.

ANOTHER GRUB

Brisbane greyhounds there is a dog going around and
I am wondering if its related to you?
The dog is Miss Grub.

no relation mal, I think Tony Zammit has it from memory.... doesnt have much ability.

i'm sure mal will remember this, it happened at footy park in one of the eagles/centrals gf the wind was blowing a gale into the pocket & after watching the reserves you could see that it was going to be difficult to score so some smart punters (not me) back no goals 1st 1/4 @ $101 & thats exactly what happened no goals johnny DID NOT PAY i dont know if he was made to pay by the board after but he refused to pay on the day so everyone that lost threw their ticket away & the winners did not get paid
thats a great way to make money lay bets & dont pay the winners

bayman wrote:i'm sure mal will remember this, it happened at footy park in one of the eagles/centrals gf the wind was blowing a gale into the pocket & after watching the reserves you could see that it was going to be difficult to score so some smart punters (not me) back no goals 1st 1/4 @ $101 & thats exactly what happened no goals johnny DID NOT PAY i dont know if he was made to pay by the board after but he refused to pay on the day so everyone that lost threw their ticket away & the winners did not get paid
thats a great way to make money lay bets & dont pay the winners

How could he justify not paying?

bayman wrote:i'm sure mal will remember this, it happened at footy park in one of the eagles/centrals gf the wind was blowing a gale into the pocket & after watching the reserves you could see that it was going to be difficult to score so some smart punters (not me) back no goals 1st 1/4 @ $101 & thats exactly what happened no goals johnny DID NOT PAY i dont know if he was made to pay by the board after but he refused to pay on the day so everyone that lost threw their ticket away & the winners did not get paid
thats a great way to make money lay bets & dont pay the winners

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The game was the grand final EG V CD at aami staduim.

JOHN THIEFTON was betting on the first goal first quarter and at quarter time
there was a goaless quarter.
Sports bookies put up the field of players and odds and then have two more signs stipulating:

A: QUOTE OTHERS [quotes for players not listed on bookies display units]
b: NO GOALSCORER [ you can back no goalscorer in the quarter]

THIEFTON did not display the NO GOALSCORER sign and therefore should have been liable
to refund the punters money.
There were many irate punters who I personally calmed down and told them of thier rights.

This was just another level of incompetence showen by JOHN THIEFTON.

THIEFTON in the bookmaking fraternity is, allegedly, a despised and disliked individual.

I just dont know what to call him, maybe a poll to adjudicate.

A...JOKETON
B...GERMTON
C...THIEFTON
d...THORNTON

"Thorn-ton in Mal's side, that's all Johhny will ever be"
Sung to the tune of "Thorn In My Side- Eurythmics"

And we all know why Carlton is struggling
They have a THORNTON playing for them !!!!

Another one I remember - before Hewitt had won a grand slam I asked Joketon to quote me on Hewitt winning one in the next 12 months. He refused to. Hewitt then won his first in that 12 months.

It pisses me off when they offer to quote you on whatever and then don't.

Squawk wrote:Another one I remember - before Hewitt had won a grand slam I asked Joketon to quote me on Hewitt winning one in the next 12 months. He refused to. Hewitt then won his first in that 12 months.

It pisses me off when they offer to quote you on whatever and then don't.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

GERMTON dosent quote he cheats of other bookies odds.
The SANFL is the only domain where he puts up odds
and if you are a little patient you can pick him off.

As far as asking for a quote on HEWITT he probably
thought you were talking about Evan Hewitt the former
NM and NW footballer.