Page 1 of 1

champion pacer breaksdown

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:46 pm
by bayman
champion pacer 'it is i' has broken down yesterday during a trial & will miss the miracle mile & will be off the scene for at least 12 months

if this horse had four good legs instead of two it would be the best horse we've seen since preux chevalier in my opinion

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:49 pm
by another grub
I did have ability bayman and it is terribly sad we never got to see the best of this one.... he had plenty of improvment in him

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:06 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
it had a bit of ability

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:06 pm
by Maddogmike
now THAT is Racing!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:08 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
no it thats TRIALLING

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:12 pm
by MAY-Z
would this be the end of the horse, ive lost count of how many injury lay offs its had.

perhaps here is a case for those to argue that horses should have mandatory spacing between runs, about 1 run every 18 months should be about right for this one unfortunately

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:22 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
MAY-Z wrote:would this be the end of the horse, ive lost count of how many injury lay offs its had.

perhaps here is a case for those to argue that horses should have mandatory spacing between runs, about 1 run every 18 months should be about right for this one unfortunately


horses can breakdown at any given time and this horse wouldnt have been over-raced

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:53 pm
by MAY-Z
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:would this be the end of the horse, ive lost count of how many injury lay offs its had.

perhaps here is a case for those to argue that horses should have mandatory spacing between runs, about 1 run every 18 months should be about right for this one unfortunately


horses can breakdown at any given time and this horse wouldnt have been over-raced


i know it wouldnt have been overraced as it has hardly ever raced, epecially for a horse with the ability of this one, but with a few people on here seemingly so concerned for animal welfare should this horse be allowed to race again given its horrific injury record?

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:59 pm
by mal
MAY-Z wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
MAY-Z wrote:would this be the end of the horse, ive lost count of how many injury lay offs its had.

perhaps here is a case for those to argue that horses should have mandatory spacing between runs, about 1 run every 18 months should be about right for this one unfortunately


horses can breakdown at any given time and this horse wouldnt have been over-raced


i know it wouldnt have been overraced as it has hardly ever raced, epecially for a horse with the ability of this one, but with a few people on here seemingly so concerned for aniMAL welfare should this horse be allowed to race again given its horrific injury record?


If the horse is raced in conventional circumstances, no interference from aniMAL welfare
groups, this particular horse is an isolated case of being injury prone+ difficult to assess.
The onus is on the owners/trainers and possibly the stewards as a decision process.
Failing that and the horse has a history of breaking down then aniMAL welfare should make a report and take action.
If the aniMAL is raced 3 times a week, then aniMAL welfare intervention is warranted.