by Punk Rooster » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:15 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Punk Rooster » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:37 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:20 am
by our_longreach » Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:29 am
by Punk Rooster » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:20 am
our_longreach wrote:not real sure about the integrity of the racing industry and Betfairs "laying" of bets.
hypothetically, if you were the owner of an odds on shot, you could lay it for a big amount on betfair and take steps to ensure it does not win (as any owner would know there are more ways to lose than to ensure it will win).
how the hell can this be regulated by stewards??
what are everyone's thoughts??
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:21 am
our_longreach wrote:not real sure about the integrity of the racing industry and Betfairs "laying" of bets.
hypothetically, if you were the owner of an odds on shot, you could lay it for a big amount on betfair and take steps to ensure it does not win (as any owner would know there are more ways to lose than to ensure it will win).
how the hell can this be regulated by stewards??
what are everyone's thoughts??
by our_longreach » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:43 am
Punk Rooster wrote:no different to holding a racing animal back for a few runs, to get a better price, & then plunging it.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:56 am
our_longreach wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:no different to holding a racing animal back for a few runs, to get a better price, & then plunging it.
the big difference is that it is much harder to win than it is to lose
by mal » Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:32 am
our_longreach wrote:not real sure about the integrity of the racing industry and Betfairs "laying" of bets.
hypothetically, if you were the owner of an odds on shot, you could lay it for a big amount on betfair and take steps to ensure it does not win (as any owner would know there are more ways to lose than to ensure it will win).
how the hell can this be regulated by stewards??
what are everyone's thoughts??
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:48 am
by our_longreach » Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:57 am
by mal » Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:32 pm
our_longreach wrote:they are all good points mal, but with a revolutionised betting systems, such as laying a horse or dog, we will also need a revolutionised governenance system (eg stewards, etc.) otherwise we will find ourselves in the middle of major bet fixing rings and the like.
for example, going back to the laying of a horse, do stewards have the ability (or agenda) to trace bets against a odds on pop through betfair. if the answer is no, then there is a serious flaw in the system and an avenue for cheating.
by another grub » Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:40 pm
by our_longreach » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:45 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:45 pm
our_longreach wrote:not real sure about the integrity of the racing industry and Betfairs "laying" of bets.
hypothetically, if you were the owner of an odds on shot, you could lay it for a big amount on betfair and take steps to ensure it does not win (as any owner would know there are more ways to lose than to ensure it will win).
how the hell can this be regulated by stewards??
what are everyone's thoughts??
by scoob » Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:44 am
by rooburger » Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:04 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |